Science policies for reducing societal inequities

Edward Woodhouse, Daniel Sarewitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an effort to move social justice issues higher on R&D policy-making agendas, we ask whether new technoscientific capacities introduced into a non-egalitarian society tend disproportionately to benefit the affluent and powerful. To demonstrate plausibility of the hypothesis, we first review examples of grossly non-egalitarian outcomes from military, medical, and other R&D arenas. We then attempt to debunk the science-inequity link by looking for substantial categories where R&D is conducive to reducing unjustified inequalities. For example, R&D sometimes enables less affluent persons to purchase more or better goods and services. Although the case for price-based equity proves weaker than normally believed, R&D targeted towards public goods turns out to offer a reasonable chance of equity enhancement, as do several other potentially viable approaches to science policy. However, major changes in science-policy institutions and participants probably would be required for R&D to serve humanity equitably.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-150
Number of pages12
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

science policy
equity
social justice
purchase
Military
policy making
human being
science
policy
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Science policies for reducing societal inequities. / Woodhouse, Edward; Sarewitz, Daniel.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 139-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodhouse, Edward ; Sarewitz, Daniel. / Science policies for reducing societal inequities. In: Science and Public Policy. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 139-150.
@article{fb24ac69a376478f89939f362f41a957,
title = "Science policies for reducing societal inequities",
abstract = "In an effort to move social justice issues higher on R&D policy-making agendas, we ask whether new technoscientific capacities introduced into a non-egalitarian society tend disproportionately to benefit the affluent and powerful. To demonstrate plausibility of the hypothesis, we first review examples of grossly non-egalitarian outcomes from military, medical, and other R&D arenas. We then attempt to debunk the science-inequity link by looking for substantial categories where R&D is conducive to reducing unjustified inequalities. For example, R&D sometimes enables less affluent persons to purchase more or better goods and services. Although the case for price-based equity proves weaker than normally believed, R&D targeted towards public goods turns out to offer a reasonable chance of equity enhancement, as do several other potentially viable approaches to science policy. However, major changes in science-policy institutions and participants probably would be required for R&D to serve humanity equitably.",
author = "Edward Woodhouse and Daniel Sarewitz",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3152/030234207X195158",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "139--150",
journal = "Science and Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science policies for reducing societal inequities

AU - Woodhouse, Edward

AU - Sarewitz, Daniel

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - In an effort to move social justice issues higher on R&D policy-making agendas, we ask whether new technoscientific capacities introduced into a non-egalitarian society tend disproportionately to benefit the affluent and powerful. To demonstrate plausibility of the hypothesis, we first review examples of grossly non-egalitarian outcomes from military, medical, and other R&D arenas. We then attempt to debunk the science-inequity link by looking for substantial categories where R&D is conducive to reducing unjustified inequalities. For example, R&D sometimes enables less affluent persons to purchase more or better goods and services. Although the case for price-based equity proves weaker than normally believed, R&D targeted towards public goods turns out to offer a reasonable chance of equity enhancement, as do several other potentially viable approaches to science policy. However, major changes in science-policy institutions and participants probably would be required for R&D to serve humanity equitably.

AB - In an effort to move social justice issues higher on R&D policy-making agendas, we ask whether new technoscientific capacities introduced into a non-egalitarian society tend disproportionately to benefit the affluent and powerful. To demonstrate plausibility of the hypothesis, we first review examples of grossly non-egalitarian outcomes from military, medical, and other R&D arenas. We then attempt to debunk the science-inequity link by looking for substantial categories where R&D is conducive to reducing unjustified inequalities. For example, R&D sometimes enables less affluent persons to purchase more or better goods and services. Although the case for price-based equity proves weaker than normally believed, R&D targeted towards public goods turns out to offer a reasonable chance of equity enhancement, as do several other potentially viable approaches to science policy. However, major changes in science-policy institutions and participants probably would be required for R&D to serve humanity equitably.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249696059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249696059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3152/030234207X195158

DO - 10.3152/030234207X195158

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249696059

VL - 34

SP - 139

EP - 150

JO - Science and Public Policy

JF - Science and Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 2

ER -