Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends

Elizabeth Corley, Meghna Sabharwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have confirmed the interdisciplinary nature of the field of public administration (Mosher 1956; Ventriss 1991; Forrester 1996; Rodgers and Rodgers 2000; Schroeder et al. 2004) and encouraged the exploration of one important indicator of interdisciplinarity: research collaboration. One way that collaboration patterns are explored is through the study of co-authorship among faculty members (Smart and Bayer 1986; Forrester 1996; Katz and Martin 1997). In the field of public administration, studies on co-authorship and productivity of scholars are sparse. In this article, we use bibliometric data to explore collaboration patterns as they relate to productivity levels and quality of publications within the field of public administration. Our study finds that more productive scholars, as well as those with the highest impact, are less likely to collaborate than their colleagues. Our results also indicate that there are gender differences in collaboration patterns and productivity within the field of public administration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-648
Number of pages22
JournalPublic Administration
Volume88
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

public administration
productivity
trend
interdisciplinarity
gender-specific factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration : Analysing recent trends. / Corley, Elizabeth; Sabharwal, Meghna.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 88, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 627-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01c7631db96141dea85aee1afcfc1eea,
title = "Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends",
abstract = "Previous studies have confirmed the interdisciplinary nature of the field of public administration (Mosher 1956; Ventriss 1991; Forrester 1996; Rodgers and Rodgers 2000; Schroeder et al. 2004) and encouraged the exploration of one important indicator of interdisciplinarity: research collaboration. One way that collaboration patterns are explored is through the study of co-authorship among faculty members (Smart and Bayer 1986; Forrester 1996; Katz and Martin 1997). In the field of public administration, studies on co-authorship and productivity of scholars are sparse. In this article, we use bibliometric data to explore collaboration patterns as they relate to productivity levels and quality of publications within the field of public administration. Our study finds that more productive scholars, as well as those with the highest impact, are less likely to collaborate than their colleagues. Our results also indicate that there are gender differences in collaboration patterns and productivity within the field of public administration.",
author = "Elizabeth Corley and Meghna Sabharwal",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "627--648",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration

T2 - Analysing recent trends

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Sabharwal, Meghna

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Previous studies have confirmed the interdisciplinary nature of the field of public administration (Mosher 1956; Ventriss 1991; Forrester 1996; Rodgers and Rodgers 2000; Schroeder et al. 2004) and encouraged the exploration of one important indicator of interdisciplinarity: research collaboration. One way that collaboration patterns are explored is through the study of co-authorship among faculty members (Smart and Bayer 1986; Forrester 1996; Katz and Martin 1997). In the field of public administration, studies on co-authorship and productivity of scholars are sparse. In this article, we use bibliometric data to explore collaboration patterns as they relate to productivity levels and quality of publications within the field of public administration. Our study finds that more productive scholars, as well as those with the highest impact, are less likely to collaborate than their colleagues. Our results also indicate that there are gender differences in collaboration patterns and productivity within the field of public administration.

AB - Previous studies have confirmed the interdisciplinary nature of the field of public administration (Mosher 1956; Ventriss 1991; Forrester 1996; Rodgers and Rodgers 2000; Schroeder et al. 2004) and encouraged the exploration of one important indicator of interdisciplinarity: research collaboration. One way that collaboration patterns are explored is through the study of co-authorship among faculty members (Smart and Bayer 1986; Forrester 1996; Katz and Martin 1997). In the field of public administration, studies on co-authorship and productivity of scholars are sparse. In this article, we use bibliometric data to explore collaboration patterns as they relate to productivity levels and quality of publications within the field of public administration. Our study finds that more productive scholars, as well as those with the highest impact, are less likely to collaborate than their colleagues. Our results also indicate that there are gender differences in collaboration patterns and productivity within the field of public administration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956277807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956277807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956277807

VL - 88

SP - 627

EP - 648

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 3

ER -