16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the intersections between two futures-oriented domains of practice and research: scenario planning and design. Both are practice-led, with uneasy but productive relationships with theorizing. Exploring their relations offers ways to address challenges faced by interdisciplinary management research, which struggles to connect research and practice. The authors describe how they brought the two fields together. We outline how we convened, designed and facilitated the fourth Oxford Futures Forum held in May 2014. This event brought together leading practitioners and researchers in a collective inquiry based on self-organizing, generative and reflexive making and dialogue. How participants engaged, from responding to the invitation to take part, as well as their practical and discursive encounters with one another during the event, threw up similarities and differences between the two fields. We present nine themes that capture the links and spaces between design and scenarios, yet suggest that they are not a straightforward overlap or a simple relationship, but rather a range of interactions between the fields, including feeding in, bridging, tension and repulsion. The paper's contribution is to suggest how scenario planning can engage with design, resulting in new opportunities for research and projects. These modes of engagement provide a framing to explore dialogues between other management disciplines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-17
Number of pages14
JournalFutures
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

dialogue
scenario
planning
event
management
Scenarios
interaction
Scenario planning
Theorizing
Self-organizing
Interaction
Management research

Keywords

  • Design thinking
  • Engaged scholarship
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Scenario planning
  • Strategic design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Scenarios and design : Scoping the dialogue space. / Selin, Cynthia; Kimbell, Lucy; Ramirez, Rafael; Bhatti, Yasser.

In: Futures, Vol. 74, 01.11.2015, p. 4-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Selin, Cynthia ; Kimbell, Lucy ; Ramirez, Rafael ; Bhatti, Yasser. / Scenarios and design : Scoping the dialogue space. In: Futures. 2015 ; Vol. 74. pp. 4-17.
@article{f90c766dd5b34f34817e840a1b5a7e91,
title = "Scenarios and design: Scoping the dialogue space",
abstract = "This paper examines the intersections between two futures-oriented domains of practice and research: scenario planning and design. Both are practice-led, with uneasy but productive relationships with theorizing. Exploring their relations offers ways to address challenges faced by interdisciplinary management research, which struggles to connect research and practice. The authors describe how they brought the two fields together. We outline how we convened, designed and facilitated the fourth Oxford Futures Forum held in May 2014. This event brought together leading practitioners and researchers in a collective inquiry based on self-organizing, generative and reflexive making and dialogue. How participants engaged, from responding to the invitation to take part, as well as their practical and discursive encounters with one another during the event, threw up similarities and differences between the two fields. We present nine themes that capture the links and spaces between design and scenarios, yet suggest that they are not a straightforward overlap or a simple relationship, but rather a range of interactions between the fields, including feeding in, bridging, tension and repulsion. The paper's contribution is to suggest how scenario planning can engage with design, resulting in new opportunities for research and projects. These modes of engagement provide a framing to explore dialogues between other management disciplines.",
keywords = "Design thinking, Engaged scholarship, Interdisciplinarity, Scenario planning, Strategic design",
author = "Cynthia Selin and Lucy Kimbell and Rafael Ramirez and Yasser Bhatti",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "4--17",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scenarios and design

T2 - Scoping the dialogue space

AU - Selin, Cynthia

AU - Kimbell, Lucy

AU - Ramirez, Rafael

AU - Bhatti, Yasser

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - This paper examines the intersections between two futures-oriented domains of practice and research: scenario planning and design. Both are practice-led, with uneasy but productive relationships with theorizing. Exploring their relations offers ways to address challenges faced by interdisciplinary management research, which struggles to connect research and practice. The authors describe how they brought the two fields together. We outline how we convened, designed and facilitated the fourth Oxford Futures Forum held in May 2014. This event brought together leading practitioners and researchers in a collective inquiry based on self-organizing, generative and reflexive making and dialogue. How participants engaged, from responding to the invitation to take part, as well as their practical and discursive encounters with one another during the event, threw up similarities and differences between the two fields. We present nine themes that capture the links and spaces between design and scenarios, yet suggest that they are not a straightforward overlap or a simple relationship, but rather a range of interactions between the fields, including feeding in, bridging, tension and repulsion. The paper's contribution is to suggest how scenario planning can engage with design, resulting in new opportunities for research and projects. These modes of engagement provide a framing to explore dialogues between other management disciplines.

AB - This paper examines the intersections between two futures-oriented domains of practice and research: scenario planning and design. Both are practice-led, with uneasy but productive relationships with theorizing. Exploring their relations offers ways to address challenges faced by interdisciplinary management research, which struggles to connect research and practice. The authors describe how they brought the two fields together. We outline how we convened, designed and facilitated the fourth Oxford Futures Forum held in May 2014. This event brought together leading practitioners and researchers in a collective inquiry based on self-organizing, generative and reflexive making and dialogue. How participants engaged, from responding to the invitation to take part, as well as their practical and discursive encounters with one another during the event, threw up similarities and differences between the two fields. We present nine themes that capture the links and spaces between design and scenarios, yet suggest that they are not a straightforward overlap or a simple relationship, but rather a range of interactions between the fields, including feeding in, bridging, tension and repulsion. The paper's contribution is to suggest how scenario planning can engage with design, resulting in new opportunities for research and projects. These modes of engagement provide a framing to explore dialogues between other management disciplines.

KW - Design thinking

KW - Engaged scholarship

KW - Interdisciplinarity

KW - Scenario planning

KW - Strategic design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949625921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949625921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949625921

VL - 74

SP - 4

EP - 17

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 0016-3287

ER -