Scale indicators of social exchange relationships

A comparison of relative content validity

Jason A. Colquitt, Michael Baer, David M. Long, Marie D K Halvorsen-Ganepola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although social exchange theory has become one of the most oft-evoked theories in industrial and organizational psychology, there remains no consensus about how to measure its key mechanism: social exchange relationships (Blau, 1964). Drawing on Cropanzano and Byrne's (2000) review of contemporary social exchange theorizing, we examined the content validity of perceived support, exchange quality, affective commitment, trust, and psychological contract fulfillment as indicators of social exchange relationships. We used Hinkin and Tracey's (1999) quantitative approach to content validation, which asks participants to rate the correspondence between scale items and definitions of intended (and unintended) constructs. Our results revealed that some of the most frequently utilized indicators of social exchange relationships-perceived support and exchange quality-were significantly less content valid than rarely used options like affect-based trust. Our results also revealed that 2 direct measures- Bernerth, Armenakis, Feild, Giles, and Walker's (2007) scale and a scale created for this study-were content valid. We discuss the implications of these results for future applications of social exchange theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-618
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume99
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Industrial Psychology
Contracts
Consensus
Psychology
Social Theory

Keywords

  • Citizenship
  • Social exchange
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Scale indicators of social exchange relationships : A comparison of relative content validity. / Colquitt, Jason A.; Baer, Michael; Long, David M.; Halvorsen-Ganepola, Marie D K.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 4, 2014, p. 599-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colquitt, Jason A. ; Baer, Michael ; Long, David M. ; Halvorsen-Ganepola, Marie D K. / Scale indicators of social exchange relationships : A comparison of relative content validity. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 99, No. 4. pp. 599-618.
@article{d8036cfb6b2a438996814c1c058f24b0,
title = "Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity",
abstract = "Although social exchange theory has become one of the most oft-evoked theories in industrial and organizational psychology, there remains no consensus about how to measure its key mechanism: social exchange relationships (Blau, 1964). Drawing on Cropanzano and Byrne's (2000) review of contemporary social exchange theorizing, we examined the content validity of perceived support, exchange quality, affective commitment, trust, and psychological contract fulfillment as indicators of social exchange relationships. We used Hinkin and Tracey's (1999) quantitative approach to content validation, which asks participants to rate the correspondence between scale items and definitions of intended (and unintended) constructs. Our results revealed that some of the most frequently utilized indicators of social exchange relationships-perceived support and exchange quality-were significantly less content valid than rarely used options like affect-based trust. Our results also revealed that 2 direct measures- Bernerth, Armenakis, Feild, Giles, and Walker's (2007) scale and a scale created for this study-were content valid. We discuss the implications of these results for future applications of social exchange theory.",
keywords = "Citizenship, Social exchange, Trust",
author = "Colquitt, {Jason A.} and Michael Baer and Long, {David M.} and Halvorsen-Ganepola, {Marie D K}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/a0036374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "599--618",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scale indicators of social exchange relationships

T2 - A comparison of relative content validity

AU - Colquitt, Jason A.

AU - Baer, Michael

AU - Long, David M.

AU - Halvorsen-Ganepola, Marie D K

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although social exchange theory has become one of the most oft-evoked theories in industrial and organizational psychology, there remains no consensus about how to measure its key mechanism: social exchange relationships (Blau, 1964). Drawing on Cropanzano and Byrne's (2000) review of contemporary social exchange theorizing, we examined the content validity of perceived support, exchange quality, affective commitment, trust, and psychological contract fulfillment as indicators of social exchange relationships. We used Hinkin and Tracey's (1999) quantitative approach to content validation, which asks participants to rate the correspondence between scale items and definitions of intended (and unintended) constructs. Our results revealed that some of the most frequently utilized indicators of social exchange relationships-perceived support and exchange quality-were significantly less content valid than rarely used options like affect-based trust. Our results also revealed that 2 direct measures- Bernerth, Armenakis, Feild, Giles, and Walker's (2007) scale and a scale created for this study-were content valid. We discuss the implications of these results for future applications of social exchange theory.

AB - Although social exchange theory has become one of the most oft-evoked theories in industrial and organizational psychology, there remains no consensus about how to measure its key mechanism: social exchange relationships (Blau, 1964). Drawing on Cropanzano and Byrne's (2000) review of contemporary social exchange theorizing, we examined the content validity of perceived support, exchange quality, affective commitment, trust, and psychological contract fulfillment as indicators of social exchange relationships. We used Hinkin and Tracey's (1999) quantitative approach to content validation, which asks participants to rate the correspondence between scale items and definitions of intended (and unintended) constructs. Our results revealed that some of the most frequently utilized indicators of social exchange relationships-perceived support and exchange quality-were significantly less content valid than rarely used options like affect-based trust. Our results also revealed that 2 direct measures- Bernerth, Armenakis, Feild, Giles, and Walker's (2007) scale and a scale created for this study-were content valid. We discuss the implications of these results for future applications of social exchange theory.

KW - Citizenship

KW - Social exchange

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904036960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904036960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0036374

DO - 10.1037/a0036374

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 599

EP - 618

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 4

ER -