TY - JOUR
T1 - Savannah woody structure modelling and mapping using multi-frequency (X-, C- and L-band) Synthetic Aperture Radar data
AU - Naidoo, Laven
AU - Mathieu, Renaud
AU - Main, Russell
AU - Kleynhans, Waldo
AU - Wessels, Konrad
AU - Asner, Gregory
AU - Leblon, Brigitte
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – South Africa, the Department of Science and Technology, South Africa (Grant Agreement DST/CON 0119/2010 , Earth Observation Application Development in Support of SAEOS) and the European Union ’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013, Grant Agreement No. 282621 , AGRICAB) for funding this study. The X-band StripMap TerraSAR-X scenes were acquired under a proposal submitted to the TerraSAR-X Science Service of the German Aerospace Center (DLR). The C-band Quad-Pol RADARSAT-2 scenes were provided by MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. – Geospatial Services Inc. (MDA GSI), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), and the Natural Resources Canada’s Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) through the Science and Operational Applications Research (SOAR) programme. The L-band ALOS PALSAR FBD scenes were acquired under a K&C Phase 3 agreement with the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). The Carnegie Airborne Observatory is supported by the Avatar Alliance Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, W.M. Keck Foundation, the Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, Mary Anne Nyburg Baker and G. Leonard Baker Jr., and William R. Hearst III. The application of the CAO data in South Africa is made possible by the Andrew Mellon Foundation, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, and the endowment of the Carnegie Institution for Science. The LiDAR data was processed by T. Kennedy-Bowdoin, D. Knapp, J. Jacobson and R. Emerson at the Carnegie Institution for Science. The authors would also like to acknowledge SANParks (Dr. Izak Smit), Sabi Sands Game Reserve (Michael Grover), WITS Rural facility (Rhian Twine and Simon Khosa), SAEON (Patrick Ndlovu and Mightyman Mashele), CSIR EO colleagues and Bushbuckridge local authorities and personnel for arranging land access, field work expertise and providing logistical support. Personal thanks also go to Mr Mikhail Urbazaev for providing support in GAMMA scripting and processing of the SAR imagery.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS).
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Structural parameters of the woody component in African savannahs provide estimates of carbon stocks that are vital to the understanding of fuelwood reserves, which is the primary source of energy for 90% of households in South Africa (80% in Sub-Saharan Africa) and are at risk of over utilisation. The woody component can be characterised by various quantifiable woody structural parameters, such as tree cover, tree height, above ground biomass (AGB) or canopy volume, each been useful for different purposes. In contrast to the limited spatial coverage of ground-based approaches, remote sensing has the ability to sense the high spatio-temporal variability of e.g. woody canopy height, cover and biomass, as well as species diversity and phenological status - a defining but challenging set of characteristics typical of African savannahs. Active remote sensing systems (e.g. Light Detection and Ranging - LiDAR; Synthetic Aperture Radar - SAR), on the other hand, may be more effective in quantifying the savannah woody component because of their ability to sense within-canopy properties of the vegetation and its insensitivity to atmosphere and clouds and shadows. Additionally, the various components of a particular target's structure can be sensed differently with SAR depending on the frequency or wavelength of the sensor being utilised. This study sought to test and compare the accuracy of modelling, in a Random Forest machine learning environment, woody above ground biomass (AGB), canopy cover (CC) and total canopy volume (TCV) in South African savannahs using a combination of X-band (TerraSAR-X), C-band (RADARSAT-2) and L-band (ALOS PALSAR) radar datasets. Training and validation data were derived from airborne LiDAR data to evaluate the SAR modelling accuracies. It was concluded that the L-band SAR frequency was more effective in the modelling of the CC (coefficient of determination or R2 of 0.77), TCV (R2 of 0.79) and AGB (R2 of 0.78) metrics in Southern African savannahs than the shorter wavelengths (X- and C-band) both as individual and combined (X+C-band) datasets. The addition of the shortest wavelengths also did not assist in the overall reduction of prediction error across different vegetation conditions (e.g. dense forested conditions, the dense shrubby layer and sparsely vegetated conditions). Although the integration of all three frequencies (X+C+L-band) yielded the best overall results for all three metrics (R2=0.83 for CC and AGB and R2=0.85 for TCV), the improvements were noticeable but marginal in comparison to the L-band alone. The results, thus, do not warrant the acquisition of all three SAR frequency datasets for tree structure monitoring in this environment.
AB - Structural parameters of the woody component in African savannahs provide estimates of carbon stocks that are vital to the understanding of fuelwood reserves, which is the primary source of energy for 90% of households in South Africa (80% in Sub-Saharan Africa) and are at risk of over utilisation. The woody component can be characterised by various quantifiable woody structural parameters, such as tree cover, tree height, above ground biomass (AGB) or canopy volume, each been useful for different purposes. In contrast to the limited spatial coverage of ground-based approaches, remote sensing has the ability to sense the high spatio-temporal variability of e.g. woody canopy height, cover and biomass, as well as species diversity and phenological status - a defining but challenging set of characteristics typical of African savannahs. Active remote sensing systems (e.g. Light Detection and Ranging - LiDAR; Synthetic Aperture Radar - SAR), on the other hand, may be more effective in quantifying the savannah woody component because of their ability to sense within-canopy properties of the vegetation and its insensitivity to atmosphere and clouds and shadows. Additionally, the various components of a particular target's structure can be sensed differently with SAR depending on the frequency or wavelength of the sensor being utilised. This study sought to test and compare the accuracy of modelling, in a Random Forest machine learning environment, woody above ground biomass (AGB), canopy cover (CC) and total canopy volume (TCV) in South African savannahs using a combination of X-band (TerraSAR-X), C-band (RADARSAT-2) and L-band (ALOS PALSAR) radar datasets. Training and validation data were derived from airborne LiDAR data to evaluate the SAR modelling accuracies. It was concluded that the L-band SAR frequency was more effective in the modelling of the CC (coefficient of determination or R2 of 0.77), TCV (R2 of 0.79) and AGB (R2 of 0.78) metrics in Southern African savannahs than the shorter wavelengths (X- and C-band) both as individual and combined (X+C-band) datasets. The addition of the shortest wavelengths also did not assist in the overall reduction of prediction error across different vegetation conditions (e.g. dense forested conditions, the dense shrubby layer and sparsely vegetated conditions). Although the integration of all three frequencies (X+C+L-band) yielded the best overall results for all three metrics (R2=0.83 for CC and AGB and R2=0.85 for TCV), the improvements were noticeable but marginal in comparison to the L-band alone. The results, thus, do not warrant the acquisition of all three SAR frequency datasets for tree structure monitoring in this environment.
KW - LiDAR
KW - Multi-frequency
KW - Random forest
KW - SAR
KW - Savannahs
KW - Woody structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928709049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928709049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.04.007
DO - 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.04.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928709049
SN - 0924-2716
VL - 105
SP - 234
EP - 250
JO - ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
JF - ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ER -