Sampling in developmental science

Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards

Marc H. Bornstein, Justin Jager, Diane L. Putnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sampling is a key feature of every study in developmental science. Although sampling has far-reaching implications, too little attention is paid to sampling. Here, we describe, discuss, and evaluate four prominent sampling strategies in developmental science: population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling, quota sampling, and homogeneous sampling. We then judge these sampling strategies by five criteria: whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of a study's target population, whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of subsamples within a study's target population, the recruitment efforts and costs they entail, whether they yield sufficient power to detect subsample differences, and whether they introduce "noise" related to variation in subsamples and whether that "noise" can be accounted for statistically. We use sample composition of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status to illustrate and assess the four sampling strategies. Finally, we tally the use of the four sampling strategies in five prominent developmental science journals and make recommendations about best practices for sample selection and reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-370
Number of pages14
JournalDevelopmental Review
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Services Needs and Demand
Noise
science
Practice Guidelines
Social Class
best practice
Costs and Cost Analysis
social status
ethnicity
Population
gender
costs

Keywords

  • Developmental science
  • Methodology
  • Sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Sampling in developmental science : Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. / Bornstein, Marc H.; Jager, Justin; Putnick, Diane L.

In: Developmental Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 357-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bornstein, Marc H. ; Jager, Justin ; Putnick, Diane L. / Sampling in developmental science : Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. In: Developmental Review. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 357-370.
@article{ce3645d903fa4b069169e2d6afc85d7f,
title = "Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards",
abstract = "Sampling is a key feature of every study in developmental science. Although sampling has far-reaching implications, too little attention is paid to sampling. Here, we describe, discuss, and evaluate four prominent sampling strategies in developmental science: population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling, quota sampling, and homogeneous sampling. We then judge these sampling strategies by five criteria: whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of a study's target population, whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of subsamples within a study's target population, the recruitment efforts and costs they entail, whether they yield sufficient power to detect subsample differences, and whether they introduce {"}noise{"} related to variation in subsamples and whether that {"}noise{"} can be accounted for statistically. We use sample composition of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status to illustrate and assess the four sampling strategies. Finally, we tally the use of the four sampling strategies in five prominent developmental science journals and make recommendations about best practices for sample selection and reporting.",
keywords = "Developmental science, Methodology, Sampling",
author = "Bornstein, {Marc H.} and Justin Jager and Putnick, {Diane L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "357--370",
journal = "Developmental Review",
issn = "0273-2297",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sampling in developmental science

T2 - Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards

AU - Bornstein, Marc H.

AU - Jager, Justin

AU - Putnick, Diane L.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Sampling is a key feature of every study in developmental science. Although sampling has far-reaching implications, too little attention is paid to sampling. Here, we describe, discuss, and evaluate four prominent sampling strategies in developmental science: population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling, quota sampling, and homogeneous sampling. We then judge these sampling strategies by five criteria: whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of a study's target population, whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of subsamples within a study's target population, the recruitment efforts and costs they entail, whether they yield sufficient power to detect subsample differences, and whether they introduce "noise" related to variation in subsamples and whether that "noise" can be accounted for statistically. We use sample composition of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status to illustrate and assess the four sampling strategies. Finally, we tally the use of the four sampling strategies in five prominent developmental science journals and make recommendations about best practices for sample selection and reporting.

AB - Sampling is a key feature of every study in developmental science. Although sampling has far-reaching implications, too little attention is paid to sampling. Here, we describe, discuss, and evaluate four prominent sampling strategies in developmental science: population-based probability sampling, convenience sampling, quota sampling, and homogeneous sampling. We then judge these sampling strategies by five criteria: whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of a study's target population, whether they yield representative and generalizable estimates of subsamples within a study's target population, the recruitment efforts and costs they entail, whether they yield sufficient power to detect subsample differences, and whether they introduce "noise" related to variation in subsamples and whether that "noise" can be accounted for statistically. We use sample composition of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status to illustrate and assess the four sampling strategies. Finally, we tally the use of the four sampling strategies in five prominent developmental science journals and make recommendations about best practices for sample selection and reporting.

KW - Developmental science

KW - Methodology

KW - Sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887607297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887607297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 357

EP - 370

JO - Developmental Review

JF - Developmental Review

SN - 0273-2297

IS - 4

ER -