Rurality and pandemic influenza

Geographic heterogeneity in the risks of infection and death in Kanagawa, Japan (1918-1919)

Hiroshi Nishiura, Gerardo Chowell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To characterise the impact of rurality on the spread of pandemic influenza by exploring both the numbers of cases and deaths in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, from October 1918 to April 1919 inclusive. Method: In addition to the numbers of influenza cases and deaths, population sizes were extracted from census data, permitting estimations of morbidity, mortality, and case fatality by 199 different regions (population 1.4 million). These outcomes were compared between four groups; cities (n=6), larger towns (38), smaller towns (101), and villages (54). Results: Whereas crude mortality in villages was lower than those of other population groups, the morbidity appeared to be the highest in villages, revealing significant difference compared to all cities and towns [risk ratio=0.601 (95% confidence interval: 0.600-0.602)]. Villages also yielded the lowest case fatality, the difference of which was statistically significant among four population groups (p=0.02). Conclusion: Rurality did not show a predictive value of protection against pandemic influenza in Kanagawa. Lower morbidity in the towns and cities is likely explained by effective preventive measures in urban areas. High morbidity in rural areas highlights the potential importance of social distancing measures in order to minimise infections in the event of the next influenza pandemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNew Zealand Medical Journal
Volume121
Issue number1284
StatePublished - Oct 17 2008

Fingerprint

Pandemics
Human Influenza
Japan
Morbidity
Infection
Population Groups
Mortality
Censuses
Population Density
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Rurality and pandemic influenza : Geographic heterogeneity in the risks of infection and death in Kanagawa, Japan (1918-1919). / Nishiura, Hiroshi; Chowell, Gerardo.

In: New Zealand Medical Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1284, 17.10.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{193c24ab56d3410b9f70a99d150014c2,
title = "Rurality and pandemic influenza: Geographic heterogeneity in the risks of infection and death in Kanagawa, Japan (1918-1919)",
abstract = "Aim: To characterise the impact of rurality on the spread of pandemic influenza by exploring both the numbers of cases and deaths in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, from October 1918 to April 1919 inclusive. Method: In addition to the numbers of influenza cases and deaths, population sizes were extracted from census data, permitting estimations of morbidity, mortality, and case fatality by 199 different regions (population 1.4 million). These outcomes were compared between four groups; cities (n=6), larger towns (38), smaller towns (101), and villages (54). Results: Whereas crude mortality in villages was lower than those of other population groups, the morbidity appeared to be the highest in villages, revealing significant difference compared to all cities and towns [risk ratio=0.601 (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.600-0.602)]. Villages also yielded the lowest case fatality, the difference of which was statistically significant among four population groups (p=0.02). Conclusion: Rurality did not show a predictive value of protection against pandemic influenza in Kanagawa. Lower morbidity in the towns and cities is likely explained by effective preventive measures in urban areas. High morbidity in rural areas highlights the potential importance of social distancing measures in order to minimise infections in the event of the next influenza pandemic.",
author = "Hiroshi Nishiura and Gerardo Chowell",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
journal = "New Zealand Medical Journal",
issn = "0028-8446",
publisher = "New Zealand Medical Association",
number = "1284",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rurality and pandemic influenza

T2 - Geographic heterogeneity in the risks of infection and death in Kanagawa, Japan (1918-1919)

AU - Nishiura, Hiroshi

AU - Chowell, Gerardo

PY - 2008/10/17

Y1 - 2008/10/17

N2 - Aim: To characterise the impact of rurality on the spread of pandemic influenza by exploring both the numbers of cases and deaths in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, from October 1918 to April 1919 inclusive. Method: In addition to the numbers of influenza cases and deaths, population sizes were extracted from census data, permitting estimations of morbidity, mortality, and case fatality by 199 different regions (population 1.4 million). These outcomes were compared between four groups; cities (n=6), larger towns (38), smaller towns (101), and villages (54). Results: Whereas crude mortality in villages was lower than those of other population groups, the morbidity appeared to be the highest in villages, revealing significant difference compared to all cities and towns [risk ratio=0.601 (95% confidence interval: 0.600-0.602)]. Villages also yielded the lowest case fatality, the difference of which was statistically significant among four population groups (p=0.02). Conclusion: Rurality did not show a predictive value of protection against pandemic influenza in Kanagawa. Lower morbidity in the towns and cities is likely explained by effective preventive measures in urban areas. High morbidity in rural areas highlights the potential importance of social distancing measures in order to minimise infections in the event of the next influenza pandemic.

AB - Aim: To characterise the impact of rurality on the spread of pandemic influenza by exploring both the numbers of cases and deaths in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, from October 1918 to April 1919 inclusive. Method: In addition to the numbers of influenza cases and deaths, population sizes were extracted from census data, permitting estimations of morbidity, mortality, and case fatality by 199 different regions (population 1.4 million). These outcomes were compared between four groups; cities (n=6), larger towns (38), smaller towns (101), and villages (54). Results: Whereas crude mortality in villages was lower than those of other population groups, the morbidity appeared to be the highest in villages, revealing significant difference compared to all cities and towns [risk ratio=0.601 (95% confidence interval: 0.600-0.602)]. Villages also yielded the lowest case fatality, the difference of which was statistically significant among four population groups (p=0.02). Conclusion: Rurality did not show a predictive value of protection against pandemic influenza in Kanagawa. Lower morbidity in the towns and cities is likely explained by effective preventive measures in urban areas. High morbidity in rural areas highlights the potential importance of social distancing measures in order to minimise infections in the event of the next influenza pandemic.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56149123330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56149123330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 121

JO - New Zealand Medical Journal

JF - New Zealand Medical Journal

SN - 0028-8446

IS - 1284

ER -