TY - JOUR
T1 - Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill
T2 - An Evaluation of Cascade
AU - VanLehn, Kurt
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Cognitive Science Division of Office of Naval Research under Grants NO001 4-92-J-1945 and N00014-94-1-0674. Preparation of the manuscript was completed while the author was a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, supported by Spencer Foundation Grant 199400132. 1 am grateful to Charles Murray, Stephanie Siler, Peter Pirolli, Mimi Recker, and Ashwin Ram for their comments on the manuscript.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Acquiring a complex cognitive skill often involves learning principles of the task domain in the midst of solving problems or studying examples. Cascade is a model of such learning. It includes both rule-based reasoning and several kinds of analogical, case-based reasoning. Task domain principles are represented as rules, and Cascade learns new rules at rule-learning events, which are initiated by an impasse and utilize multiple kinds of reasoning. In this article, I evaluate Cascade's model of rule-learning events by analyzing ones gleaned from protocols of physics students solving problems and studying examples. As expected, Cascade's model is overly simple, but it appears feasible to extend it to cover all the observed learning events. The data themselves were surprising in that there are few learning events relative to the number that could have occurred, and those that did occur often involved forms of reasoning that are considerably shallower than expected. The data suggest ways that instruction can be improved to increase both the quantity and depth of learning events.
AB - Acquiring a complex cognitive skill often involves learning principles of the task domain in the midst of solving problems or studying examples. Cascade is a model of such learning. It includes both rule-based reasoning and several kinds of analogical, case-based reasoning. Task domain principles are represented as rules, and Cascade learns new rules at rule-learning events, which are initiated by an impasse and utilize multiple kinds of reasoning. In this article, I evaluate Cascade's model of rule-learning events by analyzing ones gleaned from protocols of physics students solving problems and studying examples. As expected, Cascade's model is overly simple, but it appears feasible to extend it to cover all the observed learning events. The data themselves were surprising in that there are few learning events relative to the number that could have occurred, and those that did occur often involved forms of reasoning that are considerably shallower than expected. The data suggest ways that instruction can be improved to increase both the quantity and depth of learning events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041381613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041381613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15327809jls0801_3
DO - 10.1207/s15327809jls0801_3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0041381613
SN - 1050-8406
VL - 8
SP - 71
EP - 125
JO - Journal of the Learning Sciences
JF - Journal of the Learning Sciences
IS - 1
ER -