Roughness models for particle adhesion

Sean Eichenlaub, Anne Gelb, Steve Beaudoin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of different surface roughness models on a previously developed van der Waals adhesion model were examined. The van der Waals adhesion model represented surface roughness with a distribution of hemispherical asperities. It was found that the constraints used to define the asperity distribution on the surface, which were determined from AFM scans, varied with scan size and thus were not constant for all surfaces examined. The greatest variation in these parameters occurred with materials that had large asperities or with materials where a large fraction of the surface was covered by asperities. These rough surfaces were modeled with fractals and also with a fast Fourier transform algorithm. When the model surfaces generated using the Fourier transforms are used in the adhesion model, the model accurately predicts the experimentally observed adhesion forces measured with the AFM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-298
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Colloid and Interface Science
Volume280
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2004

Fingerprint

adhesion
roughness
Adhesion
Surface roughness
surface roughness
atomic force microscopy
Fractals
Fast Fourier transforms
fractals
Fourier transforms

Keywords

  • Fourier transform
  • Particle adhesion
  • Post-CMP cleaning
  • Surface roughness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Surfaces and Interfaces

Cite this

Roughness models for particle adhesion. / Eichenlaub, Sean; Gelb, Anne; Beaudoin, Steve.

In: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 280, No. 2, 15.12.2004, p. 289-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eichenlaub, Sean ; Gelb, Anne ; Beaudoin, Steve. / Roughness models for particle adhesion. In: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2004 ; Vol. 280, No. 2. pp. 289-298.
@article{22d9541a9e554353b2c6ce1ffe7e9ae6,
title = "Roughness models for particle adhesion",
abstract = "The effects of different surface roughness models on a previously developed van der Waals adhesion model were examined. The van der Waals adhesion model represented surface roughness with a distribution of hemispherical asperities. It was found that the constraints used to define the asperity distribution on the surface, which were determined from AFM scans, varied with scan size and thus were not constant for all surfaces examined. The greatest variation in these parameters occurred with materials that had large asperities or with materials where a large fraction of the surface was covered by asperities. These rough surfaces were modeled with fractals and also with a fast Fourier transform algorithm. When the model surfaces generated using the Fourier transforms are used in the adhesion model, the model accurately predicts the experimentally observed adhesion forces measured with the AFM.",
keywords = "Fourier transform, Particle adhesion, Post-CMP cleaning, Surface roughness",
author = "Sean Eichenlaub and Anne Gelb and Steve Beaudoin",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "280",
pages = "289--298",
journal = "Journal of Colloid and Interface Science",
issn = "0021-9797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roughness models for particle adhesion

AU - Eichenlaub, Sean

AU - Gelb, Anne

AU - Beaudoin, Steve

PY - 2004/12/15

Y1 - 2004/12/15

N2 - The effects of different surface roughness models on a previously developed van der Waals adhesion model were examined. The van der Waals adhesion model represented surface roughness with a distribution of hemispherical asperities. It was found that the constraints used to define the asperity distribution on the surface, which were determined from AFM scans, varied with scan size and thus were not constant for all surfaces examined. The greatest variation in these parameters occurred with materials that had large asperities or with materials where a large fraction of the surface was covered by asperities. These rough surfaces were modeled with fractals and also with a fast Fourier transform algorithm. When the model surfaces generated using the Fourier transforms are used in the adhesion model, the model accurately predicts the experimentally observed adhesion forces measured with the AFM.

AB - The effects of different surface roughness models on a previously developed van der Waals adhesion model were examined. The van der Waals adhesion model represented surface roughness with a distribution of hemispherical asperities. It was found that the constraints used to define the asperity distribution on the surface, which were determined from AFM scans, varied with scan size and thus were not constant for all surfaces examined. The greatest variation in these parameters occurred with materials that had large asperities or with materials where a large fraction of the surface was covered by asperities. These rough surfaces were modeled with fractals and also with a fast Fourier transform algorithm. When the model surfaces generated using the Fourier transforms are used in the adhesion model, the model accurately predicts the experimentally observed adhesion forces measured with the AFM.

KW - Fourier transform

KW - Particle adhesion

KW - Post-CMP cleaning

KW - Surface roughness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7944236277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7944236277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 15533399

AN - SCOPUS:7944236277

VL - 280

SP - 289

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

JF - Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

SN - 0021-9797

IS - 2

ER -