Romantic attraction: Misattribution versus reinforcement explanations

Douglas Kenrick, Robert B. Cialdini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reinforcement principles have been widely accepted as predictive of "liking" between individuals. The present paper takes the position that other diverse forms of attraction, including human "love" and infrahuman bonding, are likewise best explained in reinforcement terms. Although research that demonstrates increased romantic attraction under aversive circumstances has been interpreted as contradictory to reinforcement principles and, instead, consistent with a Schachterian misattribution view of romantic attraction, difficulties with the misattribution explanation are seen to exist. The studies reviewed did not attempt to disguise the actual sources of arousal and failed to take into account the possibility that the presence of the rated person may have reduced fear or anxiety. Several aspects of the data support a fear-reduction model over the misattribution model. An alternative formulation, consistent with reinforcement principles, is proposed as more parsimonious in explaining all available data. Literature on emotional bonding in subhumans is also reviewed to support the position taken in the present paper, and the potential adaptive significance of increased bonding under aversive circumstances is discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-391
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reinforcement
anxiety
Fear
Love
Arousal
love
Anxiety
human being
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Research
Object Attachment

Keywords

  • infrahuman bonding, literature review
  • misattribution vs reinforcement explanations, interpersonal attraction &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Romantic attraction : Misattribution versus reinforcement explanations. / Kenrick, Douglas; Cialdini, Robert B.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.1977, p. 381-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4f37e58955842f2a0e295a8e4007389,
title = "Romantic attraction: Misattribution versus reinforcement explanations",
abstract = "Reinforcement principles have been widely accepted as predictive of {"}liking{"} between individuals. The present paper takes the position that other diverse forms of attraction, including human {"}love{"} and infrahuman bonding, are likewise best explained in reinforcement terms. Although research that demonstrates increased romantic attraction under aversive circumstances has been interpreted as contradictory to reinforcement principles and, instead, consistent with a Schachterian misattribution view of romantic attraction, difficulties with the misattribution explanation are seen to exist. The studies reviewed did not attempt to disguise the actual sources of arousal and failed to take into account the possibility that the presence of the rated person may have reduced fear or anxiety. Several aspects of the data support a fear-reduction model over the misattribution model. An alternative formulation, consistent with reinforcement principles, is proposed as more parsimonious in explaining all available data. Literature on emotional bonding in subhumans is also reviewed to support the position taken in the present paper, and the potential adaptive significance of increased bonding under aversive circumstances is discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "infrahuman bonding, literature review, misattribution vs reinforcement explanations, interpersonal attraction &",
author = "Douglas Kenrick and Cialdini, {Robert B.}",
year = "1977",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.35.6.381",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "381--391",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Romantic attraction

T2 - Misattribution versus reinforcement explanations

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

AU - Cialdini, Robert B.

PY - 1977/6

Y1 - 1977/6

N2 - Reinforcement principles have been widely accepted as predictive of "liking" between individuals. The present paper takes the position that other diverse forms of attraction, including human "love" and infrahuman bonding, are likewise best explained in reinforcement terms. Although research that demonstrates increased romantic attraction under aversive circumstances has been interpreted as contradictory to reinforcement principles and, instead, consistent with a Schachterian misattribution view of romantic attraction, difficulties with the misattribution explanation are seen to exist. The studies reviewed did not attempt to disguise the actual sources of arousal and failed to take into account the possibility that the presence of the rated person may have reduced fear or anxiety. Several aspects of the data support a fear-reduction model over the misattribution model. An alternative formulation, consistent with reinforcement principles, is proposed as more parsimonious in explaining all available data. Literature on emotional bonding in subhumans is also reviewed to support the position taken in the present paper, and the potential adaptive significance of increased bonding under aversive circumstances is discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Reinforcement principles have been widely accepted as predictive of "liking" between individuals. The present paper takes the position that other diverse forms of attraction, including human "love" and infrahuman bonding, are likewise best explained in reinforcement terms. Although research that demonstrates increased romantic attraction under aversive circumstances has been interpreted as contradictory to reinforcement principles and, instead, consistent with a Schachterian misattribution view of romantic attraction, difficulties with the misattribution explanation are seen to exist. The studies reviewed did not attempt to disguise the actual sources of arousal and failed to take into account the possibility that the presence of the rated person may have reduced fear or anxiety. Several aspects of the data support a fear-reduction model over the misattribution model. An alternative formulation, consistent with reinforcement principles, is proposed as more parsimonious in explaining all available data. Literature on emotional bonding in subhumans is also reviewed to support the position taken in the present paper, and the potential adaptive significance of increased bonding under aversive circumstances is discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - infrahuman bonding, literature review

KW - misattribution vs reinforcement explanations, interpersonal attraction &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542454364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542454364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.35.6.381

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.35.6.381

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1542454364

VL - 35

SP - 381

EP - 391

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -