Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action

Robert Gray, D. Regan, Brooke Castaneda, Randy Sieffert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We quantified the accuracy of the perception of the absolute direction of motion-in-depth (MID) of a simulated approaching object using a perceptual task and compared those data with the accuracy of estimating the passing distance measured by means of a simulated catching task. For the simulated catching task, movements of the index finger and thumb of the observer's hand were tracked as participants tried to "catch" the simulated approaching object. A sensation of MID was created by providing monocular and/or binocular retinal image information. Visual stimuli were identical for perceptual and simulated catching tasks. We confirm previous reports that in the perceptual task, observers judged the object to pass wider of the head than indicated by the visual information provided. Although accuracy improved when auditory feedback was added to the perceptual (button pressing) task, consistent overestimates were still recorded. For the no-feedback simulated catching task, observers consistently overreached, i.e., the hand was further away from the midline than the simulated object at the time of hand closure. When auditory feedback was added to the simulated catching task successful catching was achieved. The relative accuracy in binocular and monocular conditions for individual observers could be partially explained by individual differences in sensitivity to unidirectional changes in angular size and changes in relative disparity. We conclude that catching an approaching ball requires that errors in the perceived direction of MID are corrected by feedback-driven learning in the motor system, and that this learning is more easily achieved for the catching action than for button pressing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1676-1694
Number of pages19
JournalVision Research
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Hand
Thumb
Individuality
Fingers
Head
Learning
Direction compound
Formative Feedback

Keywords

  • Action
  • Binocular vision
  • Interception
  • Motion-in-depth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action. / Gray, Robert; Regan, D.; Castaneda, Brooke; Sieffert, Randy.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 10, 05.2006, p. 1676-1694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gray, Robert ; Regan, D. ; Castaneda, Brooke ; Sieffert, Randy. / Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action. In: Vision Research. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 10. pp. 1676-1694.
@article{fb1199901d5143a082e4cbfab3d94a4a,
title = "Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action",
abstract = "We quantified the accuracy of the perception of the absolute direction of motion-in-depth (MID) of a simulated approaching object using a perceptual task and compared those data with the accuracy of estimating the passing distance measured by means of a simulated catching task. For the simulated catching task, movements of the index finger and thumb of the observer's hand were tracked as participants tried to {"}catch{"} the simulated approaching object. A sensation of MID was created by providing monocular and/or binocular retinal image information. Visual stimuli were identical for perceptual and simulated catching tasks. We confirm previous reports that in the perceptual task, observers judged the object to pass wider of the head than indicated by the visual information provided. Although accuracy improved when auditory feedback was added to the perceptual (button pressing) task, consistent overestimates were still recorded. For the no-feedback simulated catching task, observers consistently overreached, i.e., the hand was further away from the midline than the simulated object at the time of hand closure. When auditory feedback was added to the simulated catching task successful catching was achieved. The relative accuracy in binocular and monocular conditions for individual observers could be partially explained by individual differences in sensitivity to unidirectional changes in angular size and changes in relative disparity. We conclude that catching an approaching ball requires that errors in the perceived direction of MID are corrected by feedback-driven learning in the motor system, and that this learning is more easily achieved for the catching action than for button pressing.",
keywords = "Action, Binocular vision, Interception, Motion-in-depth",
author = "Robert Gray and D. Regan and Brooke Castaneda and Randy Sieffert",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1676--1694",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action

AU - Gray, Robert

AU - Regan, D.

AU - Castaneda, Brooke

AU - Sieffert, Randy

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - We quantified the accuracy of the perception of the absolute direction of motion-in-depth (MID) of a simulated approaching object using a perceptual task and compared those data with the accuracy of estimating the passing distance measured by means of a simulated catching task. For the simulated catching task, movements of the index finger and thumb of the observer's hand were tracked as participants tried to "catch" the simulated approaching object. A sensation of MID was created by providing monocular and/or binocular retinal image information. Visual stimuli were identical for perceptual and simulated catching tasks. We confirm previous reports that in the perceptual task, observers judged the object to pass wider of the head than indicated by the visual information provided. Although accuracy improved when auditory feedback was added to the perceptual (button pressing) task, consistent overestimates were still recorded. For the no-feedback simulated catching task, observers consistently overreached, i.e., the hand was further away from the midline than the simulated object at the time of hand closure. When auditory feedback was added to the simulated catching task successful catching was achieved. The relative accuracy in binocular and monocular conditions for individual observers could be partially explained by individual differences in sensitivity to unidirectional changes in angular size and changes in relative disparity. We conclude that catching an approaching ball requires that errors in the perceived direction of MID are corrected by feedback-driven learning in the motor system, and that this learning is more easily achieved for the catching action than for button pressing.

AB - We quantified the accuracy of the perception of the absolute direction of motion-in-depth (MID) of a simulated approaching object using a perceptual task and compared those data with the accuracy of estimating the passing distance measured by means of a simulated catching task. For the simulated catching task, movements of the index finger and thumb of the observer's hand were tracked as participants tried to "catch" the simulated approaching object. A sensation of MID was created by providing monocular and/or binocular retinal image information. Visual stimuli were identical for perceptual and simulated catching tasks. We confirm previous reports that in the perceptual task, observers judged the object to pass wider of the head than indicated by the visual information provided. Although accuracy improved when auditory feedback was added to the perceptual (button pressing) task, consistent overestimates were still recorded. For the no-feedback simulated catching task, observers consistently overreached, i.e., the hand was further away from the midline than the simulated object at the time of hand closure. When auditory feedback was added to the simulated catching task successful catching was achieved. The relative accuracy in binocular and monocular conditions for individual observers could be partially explained by individual differences in sensitivity to unidirectional changes in angular size and changes in relative disparity. We conclude that catching an approaching ball requires that errors in the perceived direction of MID are corrected by feedback-driven learning in the motor system, and that this learning is more easily achieved for the catching action than for button pressing.

KW - Action

KW - Binocular vision

KW - Interception

KW - Motion-in-depth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31344468147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31344468147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.036

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 16169039

AN - SCOPUS:31344468147

VL - 46

SP - 1676

EP - 1694

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 10

ER -