Riverbank filtration: Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory

Vishal Gupta, W. P. Johnson, P. Shafieian, H. Ryu, Absar Alum, Morteza Abbaszadegan, S. A. Hubbs, T. Rauch-Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pilot-scale column experiments were conducted in this study using natural soil and river water from Ohio river to assess the removal of microbes of size ranging over 2 orders of magnitude, i.e., viruses (0.025-0.065 μm), bacteria (1-2μm), and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (4-7 μm) under conditions representing normal operation and flood scour events. Among these different organisms, the bacterial indicators were transported over the longest distances and highest concentrations; whereas much greater retention was observed for smaller (i.e., viral indicators) and larger (i.e., Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts) microbes. These results are in qualitative agreement with colloid filtration theory (CFT) which predicts the least removal for micrometer size colloids, suggesting that the respective sizes of the organisms was a dominant control on their transport despite expected differences in their surface characteristics. Increased fluid velocity coupled with decreased ionic strength (representative of major flood events) decreased colloid retention, also in qualitative agreement with CFT. The retention of organisms occurred disproportionately near the source relative to the log-linear expectations of CFT, and this was true both in the presence and absence of a colmation zone, suggesting that microbial removal by the RBF system is not necessarily vulnerable to flood scour of the colmation zone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-676
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Colloids
colloid
Scour
scour
Rivers
Ionic strength
Viruses
river water
Bacteria
virus
soil water
comparison
Soils
bacterium
Fluids
fluid
Water
river
organism
removal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Riverbank filtration : Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory. / Gupta, Vishal; Johnson, W. P.; Shafieian, P.; Ryu, H.; Alum, Absar; Abbaszadegan, Morteza; Hubbs, S. A.; Rauch-Williams, T.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.02.2009, p. 669-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gupta, V, Johnson, WP, Shafieian, P, Ryu, H, Alum, A, Abbaszadegan, M, Hubbs, SA & Rauch-Williams, T 2009, 'Riverbank filtration: Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory', Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8016396
Gupta, Vishal ; Johnson, W. P. ; Shafieian, P. ; Ryu, H. ; Alum, Absar ; Abbaszadegan, Morteza ; Hubbs, S. A. ; Rauch-Williams, T. / Riverbank filtration : Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2009 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 669-676.
@article{4ec2944ce4114efda62ed56c5c86a8f5,
title = "Riverbank filtration: Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory",
abstract = "Pilot-scale column experiments were conducted in this study using natural soil and river water from Ohio river to assess the removal of microbes of size ranging over 2 orders of magnitude, i.e., viruses (0.025-0.065 μm), bacteria (1-2μm), and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (4-7 μm) under conditions representing normal operation and flood scour events. Among these different organisms, the bacterial indicators were transported over the longest distances and highest concentrations; whereas much greater retention was observed for smaller (i.e., viral indicators) and larger (i.e., Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts) microbes. These results are in qualitative agreement with colloid filtration theory (CFT) which predicts the least removal for micrometer size colloids, suggesting that the respective sizes of the organisms was a dominant control on their transport despite expected differences in their surface characteristics. Increased fluid velocity coupled with decreased ionic strength (representative of major flood events) decreased colloid retention, also in qualitative agreement with CFT. The retention of organisms occurred disproportionately near the source relative to the log-linear expectations of CFT, and this was true both in the presence and absence of a colmation zone, suggesting that microbial removal by the RBF system is not necessarily vulnerable to flood scour of the colmation zone.",
author = "Vishal Gupta and Johnson, {W. P.} and P. Shafieian and H. Ryu and Absar Alum and Morteza Abbaszadegan and Hubbs, {S. A.} and T. Rauch-Williams",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/es8016396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "669--676",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Riverbank filtration

T2 - Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory

AU - Gupta, Vishal

AU - Johnson, W. P.

AU - Shafieian, P.

AU - Ryu, H.

AU - Alum, Absar

AU - Abbaszadegan, Morteza

AU - Hubbs, S. A.

AU - Rauch-Williams, T.

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Pilot-scale column experiments were conducted in this study using natural soil and river water from Ohio river to assess the removal of microbes of size ranging over 2 orders of magnitude, i.e., viruses (0.025-0.065 μm), bacteria (1-2μm), and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (4-7 μm) under conditions representing normal operation and flood scour events. Among these different organisms, the bacterial indicators were transported over the longest distances and highest concentrations; whereas much greater retention was observed for smaller (i.e., viral indicators) and larger (i.e., Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts) microbes. These results are in qualitative agreement with colloid filtration theory (CFT) which predicts the least removal for micrometer size colloids, suggesting that the respective sizes of the organisms was a dominant control on their transport despite expected differences in their surface characteristics. Increased fluid velocity coupled with decreased ionic strength (representative of major flood events) decreased colloid retention, also in qualitative agreement with CFT. The retention of organisms occurred disproportionately near the source relative to the log-linear expectations of CFT, and this was true both in the presence and absence of a colmation zone, suggesting that microbial removal by the RBF system is not necessarily vulnerable to flood scour of the colmation zone.

AB - Pilot-scale column experiments were conducted in this study using natural soil and river water from Ohio river to assess the removal of microbes of size ranging over 2 orders of magnitude, i.e., viruses (0.025-0.065 μm), bacteria (1-2μm), and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (4-7 μm) under conditions representing normal operation and flood scour events. Among these different organisms, the bacterial indicators were transported over the longest distances and highest concentrations; whereas much greater retention was observed for smaller (i.e., viral indicators) and larger (i.e., Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts) microbes. These results are in qualitative agreement with colloid filtration theory (CFT) which predicts the least removal for micrometer size colloids, suggesting that the respective sizes of the organisms was a dominant control on their transport despite expected differences in their surface characteristics. Increased fluid velocity coupled with decreased ionic strength (representative of major flood events) decreased colloid retention, also in qualitative agreement with CFT. The retention of organisms occurred disproportionately near the source relative to the log-linear expectations of CFT, and this was true both in the presence and absence of a colmation zone, suggesting that microbial removal by the RBF system is not necessarily vulnerable to flood scour of the colmation zone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63149106088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63149106088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es8016396

DO - 10.1021/es8016396

M3 - Article

C2 - 19245000

AN - SCOPUS:63149106088

VL - 43

SP - 669

EP - 676

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 3

ER -