River - Watershed exchange: Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey

John Sabo, M. E. Power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

230 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resource subsidies from external habitats can enhance the performance or population density of local consumers, altering their effects on in situ prey. Indirect effects of subsidies may be either positive or negative depending on the behavior of the shared consumer. Here we document strong links between riverine insects, riparian lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis), and terrestrial invertebrates. We hypothesized that aquatic insects subsidize riparian lizard populations leading to higher growth rates of these lizards in near-river habitats, and that subsidies exert short-term positive effects on terrestrial resources as a result of diet shifts by lizards to aquatic insects. To test these hypotheses, we used 2 m high fences, or "subsidy shields," to experimentally reduce aquatic insect flux to large (91 m2) enclosures of lizards. Subsidy shields reduced aquatic insect flux by 55-65%. Growth rates of lizards were 7 x higher in subsidized (no-shield) enclosures during the early summer but were not significantly different later in the summer, when ambient fluxes of aquatic insects dropped to 20% of their early season levels. Within the watershed, lizard growth rates (in mass) were positively correlated with the numerical abundance of aquatic insects. Thus, lizard growth rates tracked both seasonal and spatial availability of riverine insect subsidies during our, experiment. Subsidies also had indirect effects on the ground-dwelling, terrestrial prey of lizards. Declines of diurnal terrestrial invertebrates were significantly higher in shield than no-shield enclosures, and the most common ground spider (Arctosa sp. [Lycosidae]) disappeared completely from shield enclosures by the end of the experiment. Declines in terrestrial invertebrate abundance did not differ between no-shield enclosures and lizard exclosures. These data suggest that riverine insects subsidize riparian Sceloporus and, in the short term, reduce their predation on terrestrial arthropods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1860-1869
Number of pages10
JournalEcology
Volume83
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2002

Fingerprint

subsidies
lizard
lizards
watershed
aquatic insects
insect
rivers
shield
river
invertebrate
invertebrates
insects
Sceloporus occidentalis
effect
subsidy
Sceloporus
consumer behavior
Lycosidae
summer
fences

Keywords

  • Arctosa sp.
  • Functional response
  • Ground spider
  • Lizard
  • Predation
  • Riparian
  • River
  • River - watershed exchange
  • Sceloporus occidentalis
  • Subsidy
  • Watershed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

River - Watershed exchange : Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey. / Sabo, John; Power, M. E.

In: Ecology, Vol. 83, No. 7, 01.07.2002, p. 1860-1869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46526e341a1e48fe9ae64e8ef76307a0,
title = "River - Watershed exchange: Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey",
abstract = "Resource subsidies from external habitats can enhance the performance or population density of local consumers, altering their effects on in situ prey. Indirect effects of subsidies may be either positive or negative depending on the behavior of the shared consumer. Here we document strong links between riverine insects, riparian lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis), and terrestrial invertebrates. We hypothesized that aquatic insects subsidize riparian lizard populations leading to higher growth rates of these lizards in near-river habitats, and that subsidies exert short-term positive effects on terrestrial resources as a result of diet shifts by lizards to aquatic insects. To test these hypotheses, we used 2 m high fences, or {"}subsidy shields,{"} to experimentally reduce aquatic insect flux to large (91 m2) enclosures of lizards. Subsidy shields reduced aquatic insect flux by 55-65{\%}. Growth rates of lizards were 7 x higher in subsidized (no-shield) enclosures during the early summer but were not significantly different later in the summer, when ambient fluxes of aquatic insects dropped to 20{\%} of their early season levels. Within the watershed, lizard growth rates (in mass) were positively correlated with the numerical abundance of aquatic insects. Thus, lizard growth rates tracked both seasonal and spatial availability of riverine insect subsidies during our, experiment. Subsidies also had indirect effects on the ground-dwelling, terrestrial prey of lizards. Declines of diurnal terrestrial invertebrates were significantly higher in shield than no-shield enclosures, and the most common ground spider (Arctosa sp. [Lycosidae]) disappeared completely from shield enclosures by the end of the experiment. Declines in terrestrial invertebrate abundance did not differ between no-shield enclosures and lizard exclosures. These data suggest that riverine insects subsidize riparian Sceloporus and, in the short term, reduce their predation on terrestrial arthropods.",
keywords = "Arctosa sp., Functional response, Ground spider, Lizard, Predation, Riparian, River, River - watershed exchange, Sceloporus occidentalis, Subsidy, Watershed",
author = "John Sabo and Power, {M. E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1860--1869",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - River - Watershed exchange

T2 - Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey

AU - Sabo, John

AU - Power, M. E.

PY - 2002/7/1

Y1 - 2002/7/1

N2 - Resource subsidies from external habitats can enhance the performance or population density of local consumers, altering their effects on in situ prey. Indirect effects of subsidies may be either positive or negative depending on the behavior of the shared consumer. Here we document strong links between riverine insects, riparian lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis), and terrestrial invertebrates. We hypothesized that aquatic insects subsidize riparian lizard populations leading to higher growth rates of these lizards in near-river habitats, and that subsidies exert short-term positive effects on terrestrial resources as a result of diet shifts by lizards to aquatic insects. To test these hypotheses, we used 2 m high fences, or "subsidy shields," to experimentally reduce aquatic insect flux to large (91 m2) enclosures of lizards. Subsidy shields reduced aquatic insect flux by 55-65%. Growth rates of lizards were 7 x higher in subsidized (no-shield) enclosures during the early summer but were not significantly different later in the summer, when ambient fluxes of aquatic insects dropped to 20% of their early season levels. Within the watershed, lizard growth rates (in mass) were positively correlated with the numerical abundance of aquatic insects. Thus, lizard growth rates tracked both seasonal and spatial availability of riverine insect subsidies during our, experiment. Subsidies also had indirect effects on the ground-dwelling, terrestrial prey of lizards. Declines of diurnal terrestrial invertebrates were significantly higher in shield than no-shield enclosures, and the most common ground spider (Arctosa sp. [Lycosidae]) disappeared completely from shield enclosures by the end of the experiment. Declines in terrestrial invertebrate abundance did not differ between no-shield enclosures and lizard exclosures. These data suggest that riverine insects subsidize riparian Sceloporus and, in the short term, reduce their predation on terrestrial arthropods.

AB - Resource subsidies from external habitats can enhance the performance or population density of local consumers, altering their effects on in situ prey. Indirect effects of subsidies may be either positive or negative depending on the behavior of the shared consumer. Here we document strong links between riverine insects, riparian lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis), and terrestrial invertebrates. We hypothesized that aquatic insects subsidize riparian lizard populations leading to higher growth rates of these lizards in near-river habitats, and that subsidies exert short-term positive effects on terrestrial resources as a result of diet shifts by lizards to aquatic insects. To test these hypotheses, we used 2 m high fences, or "subsidy shields," to experimentally reduce aquatic insect flux to large (91 m2) enclosures of lizards. Subsidy shields reduced aquatic insect flux by 55-65%. Growth rates of lizards were 7 x higher in subsidized (no-shield) enclosures during the early summer but were not significantly different later in the summer, when ambient fluxes of aquatic insects dropped to 20% of their early season levels. Within the watershed, lizard growth rates (in mass) were positively correlated with the numerical abundance of aquatic insects. Thus, lizard growth rates tracked both seasonal and spatial availability of riverine insect subsidies during our, experiment. Subsidies also had indirect effects on the ground-dwelling, terrestrial prey of lizards. Declines of diurnal terrestrial invertebrates were significantly higher in shield than no-shield enclosures, and the most common ground spider (Arctosa sp. [Lycosidae]) disappeared completely from shield enclosures by the end of the experiment. Declines in terrestrial invertebrate abundance did not differ between no-shield enclosures and lizard exclosures. These data suggest that riverine insects subsidize riparian Sceloporus and, in the short term, reduce their predation on terrestrial arthropods.

KW - Arctosa sp.

KW - Functional response

KW - Ground spider

KW - Lizard

KW - Predation

KW - Riparian

KW - River

KW - River - watershed exchange

KW - Sceloporus occidentalis

KW - Subsidy

KW - Watershed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013156389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013156389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0013156389

VL - 83

SP - 1860

EP - 1869

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 7

ER -