Risk Sensitive Credit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Credit theorists claim to explain the incompatibility of luck and knowledge and also what makes knowledge valuable. If the theory works as well as they think, it accomplishes a lot. Unsurprisingly, however, some epistemologists remain unsure. Jennifer Lackey, for instance, proposes a dilemma that suggests credit theories are either too strong or too weak. Her criticism has been hard to overcome. This paper suggests a modified account of knowledge as credit for true belief that allows credit theorists to better counter Lackey’s criticism. I call my version of credit theory Risk Sensitive Credit. Under my account, an agent deserves credit just in case she believes truly on account of her reasonably accurate epistemic risk assessment. This assessment need not include higher order beliefs or even enter into conscious thought. Recent work in cognitive science, for instance, suggests that our visual faculties, in the absence of our direct awareness, work in accordance with a risk sensitive framework. This research will be referenced to help explain the dynamics of barn facade Gettier cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-726
Number of pages24
JournalErkenntnis
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Luck
Risk Theory
Cognitive Science
Dilemma
Risk Assessment
Higher Order
Knowledge
Credit
Beliefs
Awareness
Vision
Framework
Criticism
Theorists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Logic

Cite this

Risk Sensitive Credit. / Priest, Maura.

In: Erkenntnis, Vol. 84, No. 3, 15.06.2019, p. 703-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Priest, Maura. / Risk Sensitive Credit. In: Erkenntnis. 2019 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 703-726.
@article{fd35a33fd2ed401aa20ee854540a3551,
title = "Risk Sensitive Credit",
abstract = "Credit theorists claim to explain the incompatibility of luck and knowledge and also what makes knowledge valuable. If the theory works as well as they think, it accomplishes a lot. Unsurprisingly, however, some epistemologists remain unsure. Jennifer Lackey, for instance, proposes a dilemma that suggests credit theories are either too strong or too weak. Her criticism has been hard to overcome. This paper suggests a modified account of knowledge as credit for true belief that allows credit theorists to better counter Lackey’s criticism. I call my version of credit theory Risk Sensitive Credit. Under my account, an agent deserves credit just in case she believes truly on account of her reasonably accurate epistemic risk assessment. This assessment need not include higher order beliefs or even enter into conscious thought. Recent work in cognitive science, for instance, suggests that our visual faculties, in the absence of our direct awareness, work in accordance with a risk sensitive framework. This research will be referenced to help explain the dynamics of barn facade Gettier cases.",
author = "Maura Priest",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10670-018-9978-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "703--726",
journal = "Erkenntnis",
issn = "0165-0106",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk Sensitive Credit

AU - Priest, Maura

PY - 2019/6/15

Y1 - 2019/6/15

N2 - Credit theorists claim to explain the incompatibility of luck and knowledge and also what makes knowledge valuable. If the theory works as well as they think, it accomplishes a lot. Unsurprisingly, however, some epistemologists remain unsure. Jennifer Lackey, for instance, proposes a dilemma that suggests credit theories are either too strong or too weak. Her criticism has been hard to overcome. This paper suggests a modified account of knowledge as credit for true belief that allows credit theorists to better counter Lackey’s criticism. I call my version of credit theory Risk Sensitive Credit. Under my account, an agent deserves credit just in case she believes truly on account of her reasonably accurate epistemic risk assessment. This assessment need not include higher order beliefs or even enter into conscious thought. Recent work in cognitive science, for instance, suggests that our visual faculties, in the absence of our direct awareness, work in accordance with a risk sensitive framework. This research will be referenced to help explain the dynamics of barn facade Gettier cases.

AB - Credit theorists claim to explain the incompatibility of luck and knowledge and also what makes knowledge valuable. If the theory works as well as they think, it accomplishes a lot. Unsurprisingly, however, some epistemologists remain unsure. Jennifer Lackey, for instance, proposes a dilemma that suggests credit theories are either too strong or too weak. Her criticism has been hard to overcome. This paper suggests a modified account of knowledge as credit for true belief that allows credit theorists to better counter Lackey’s criticism. I call my version of credit theory Risk Sensitive Credit. Under my account, an agent deserves credit just in case she believes truly on account of her reasonably accurate epistemic risk assessment. This assessment need not include higher order beliefs or even enter into conscious thought. Recent work in cognitive science, for instance, suggests that our visual faculties, in the absence of our direct awareness, work in accordance with a risk sensitive framework. This research will be referenced to help explain the dynamics of barn facade Gettier cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042230674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042230674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10670-018-9978-7

DO - 10.1007/s10670-018-9978-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042230674

VL - 84

SP - 703

EP - 726

JO - Erkenntnis

JF - Erkenntnis

SN - 0165-0106

IS - 3

ER -