Abstract
The 2000 Agricultural Risk Protection Act and 2002 Farm Security and Rural Investment Act reduced price and yield risks faced by many U.S. crop producers to low levels. We use a non-structural methodology extended for application to pseudo panels and national survey data to examine the risk attitudes of U.S. corn and soybean producers to test whether, and examine how, risk attitudes varied during the 1996-2001 and 2002-2008 periods by revenue category. We cannot reject the hypothesis of risk neutrality for the entire population, and for each revenue category, for the former period, but can reject risk neutrality, in favor of risk tolerance, for the entire population and for the larger revenue categories for the latter period. Estimated risk premiums for the latter period suggest that U.S. corn and soybean farmers who earn more require larger payments to remain indifferent between receiving their expected income with certainty and receiving an uncertain income from farming and government programs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1337-1351 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Empirical Economics |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Agricultural Resource Management Survey
- Coefficient of absolute downside risk aversion
- Coefficient of absolute risk aversion
- Coefficient of relative risk aversion
- Government payments
- Risk attitudes
- Risk premiums
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Mathematics (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics