Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation

Roger E. Kasperson, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Billie Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In its 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and Development called for a global risk-assessment program to buttress and extend the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. This article reports on an international project centered at Clark University in the United States that has explored the causes and consequences of growing environmental risk over a 50-70 year period in nine regions distributed throughout the world. The nine regions are: Amazonia, the Eastern Sundaland region of southeast Asia, the Ukambani region of southeastern Kenya, the Nepal Middle Mountains, the Ordos Plateau of China, the Aral Sea, the southern High Plains of the United States, the Mexico City region, and the North Sea. The authors begin by considering the notion of criticality and developing definitions and a classification of environmentally threatened regions. Research teams were assembled for all nine regions and studies conducted. In this article, the authors review the development of concepts and methods used in these studies and the major cross-cutting findings that emerged. They argue that a growing disjuncture exists in the studied regions between the rapid rates of environmental degradation and the slow pace of societal response, threatening environmental impoverishment and loss of options for future generations and escalating costs of substitution in resource use and risk mitigation efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-568
Number of pages7
JournalAmbio
Volume28
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Weathering
environmental damage
environmental degradation
trajectory
Trajectories
Risk assessment
Substitution reactions
Costs
environmental response
United Nations Environment Program
North Sea
Nepal
resource use
Southeast Asia
environmental risk
substitution
Kenya
risk assessment
UNO
mitigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., & Turner, B. (1999). Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation. Ambio, 28(6), 562-568.

Risk and criticality : Trajectories of regional environmental degradation. / Kasperson, Roger E.; Kasperson, Jeanne X.; Turner, Billie.

In: Ambio, Vol. 28, No. 6, 09.1999, p. 562-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kasperson, RE, Kasperson, JX & Turner, B 1999, 'Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation', Ambio, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 562-568.
Kasperson, Roger E. ; Kasperson, Jeanne X. ; Turner, Billie. / Risk and criticality : Trajectories of regional environmental degradation. In: Ambio. 1999 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 562-568.
@article{4a44e5765abb44bebcd4f743560b4ea5,
title = "Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation",
abstract = "In its 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and Development called for a global risk-assessment program to buttress and extend the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. This article reports on an international project centered at Clark University in the United States that has explored the causes and consequences of growing environmental risk over a 50-70 year period in nine regions distributed throughout the world. The nine regions are: Amazonia, the Eastern Sundaland region of southeast Asia, the Ukambani region of southeastern Kenya, the Nepal Middle Mountains, the Ordos Plateau of China, the Aral Sea, the southern High Plains of the United States, the Mexico City region, and the North Sea. The authors begin by considering the notion of criticality and developing definitions and a classification of environmentally threatened regions. Research teams were assembled for all nine regions and studies conducted. In this article, the authors review the development of concepts and methods used in these studies and the major cross-cutting findings that emerged. They argue that a growing disjuncture exists in the studied regions between the rapid rates of environmental degradation and the slow pace of societal response, threatening environmental impoverishment and loss of options for future generations and escalating costs of substitution in resource use and risk mitigation efforts.",
author = "Kasperson, {Roger E.} and Kasperson, {Jeanne X.} and Billie Turner",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "562--568",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk and criticality

T2 - Trajectories of regional environmental degradation

AU - Kasperson, Roger E.

AU - Kasperson, Jeanne X.

AU - Turner, Billie

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - In its 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and Development called for a global risk-assessment program to buttress and extend the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. This article reports on an international project centered at Clark University in the United States that has explored the causes and consequences of growing environmental risk over a 50-70 year period in nine regions distributed throughout the world. The nine regions are: Amazonia, the Eastern Sundaland region of southeast Asia, the Ukambani region of southeastern Kenya, the Nepal Middle Mountains, the Ordos Plateau of China, the Aral Sea, the southern High Plains of the United States, the Mexico City region, and the North Sea. The authors begin by considering the notion of criticality and developing definitions and a classification of environmentally threatened regions. Research teams were assembled for all nine regions and studies conducted. In this article, the authors review the development of concepts and methods used in these studies and the major cross-cutting findings that emerged. They argue that a growing disjuncture exists in the studied regions between the rapid rates of environmental degradation and the slow pace of societal response, threatening environmental impoverishment and loss of options for future generations and escalating costs of substitution in resource use and risk mitigation efforts.

AB - In its 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and Development called for a global risk-assessment program to buttress and extend the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. This article reports on an international project centered at Clark University in the United States that has explored the causes and consequences of growing environmental risk over a 50-70 year period in nine regions distributed throughout the world. The nine regions are: Amazonia, the Eastern Sundaland region of southeast Asia, the Ukambani region of southeastern Kenya, the Nepal Middle Mountains, the Ordos Plateau of China, the Aral Sea, the southern High Plains of the United States, the Mexico City region, and the North Sea. The authors begin by considering the notion of criticality and developing definitions and a classification of environmentally threatened regions. Research teams were assembled for all nine regions and studies conducted. In this article, the authors review the development of concepts and methods used in these studies and the major cross-cutting findings that emerged. They argue that a growing disjuncture exists in the studied regions between the rapid rates of environmental degradation and the slow pace of societal response, threatening environmental impoverishment and loss of options for future generations and escalating costs of substitution in resource use and risk mitigation efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032721421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032721421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032721421

VL - 28

SP - 562

EP - 568

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 6

ER -