Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders

Kenneth A. Kavale, Sarup Mathur, Steven R. Forness, Mary Magee Quinn, Robert B. Rutherford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this discussion of quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis), past criticisms of meta-analysis are reviewed along with the ways in which they have been addressed. The problems associated with synthesizing single-subject research are discussed, particularly the difficulties in obtaining a metric equivalent to the effect size calculated for group-design research. After analyzing recommended approaches, the authors endorse the percentage-of-nonoverlapping-data metric. Their earlier single-subject synthesis showing limited efficacy for social skills instruction is then reviewed. The findings are discussed in relation to the nature of single-subject research, the proper role of research integration, and the influence of subjectivity in interpreting research findings. Finally, possible reasons for disappointing findings regarding the effectiveness of social skills instruction are explored. The authors conclude that, until expressed concerns are remedied, it is neither incorrect nor illogical to question the efficacy of social skills instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-157
Number of pages16
JournalBehavioral Disorders
Volume25
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Behavioral Research
instruction
Research
Group
Meta-Analysis
quantitative research
research planning
subjectivity
criticism
Research Design
Social Skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Kavale, K. A., Mathur, S., Forness, S. R., Quinn, M. M., & Rutherford, R. B. (2000). Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25(2), 142-157.

Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. / Kavale, Kenneth A.; Mathur, Sarup; Forness, Steven R.; Quinn, Mary Magee; Rutherford, Robert B.

In: Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 25, No. 2, 02.2000, p. 142-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kavale, KA, Mathur, S, Forness, SR, Quinn, MM & Rutherford, RB 2000, 'Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders', Behavioral Disorders, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 142-157.
Kavale, Kenneth A. ; Mathur, Sarup ; Forness, Steven R. ; Quinn, Mary Magee ; Rutherford, Robert B. / Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. In: Behavioral Disorders. 2000 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 142-157.
@article{e99cb8816b244eb495c3522790867e99,
title = "Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders",
abstract = "In this discussion of quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis), past criticisms of meta-analysis are reviewed along with the ways in which they have been addressed. The problems associated with synthesizing single-subject research are discussed, particularly the difficulties in obtaining a metric equivalent to the effect size calculated for group-design research. After analyzing recommended approaches, the authors endorse the percentage-of-nonoverlapping-data metric. Their earlier single-subject synthesis showing limited efficacy for social skills instruction is then reviewed. The findings are discussed in relation to the nature of single-subject research, the proper role of research integration, and the influence of subjectivity in interpreting research findings. Finally, possible reasons for disappointing findings regarding the effectiveness of social skills instruction are explored. The authors conclude that, until expressed concerns are remedied, it is neither incorrect nor illogical to question the efficacy of social skills instruction.",
author = "Kavale, {Kenneth A.} and Sarup Mathur and Forness, {Steven R.} and Quinn, {Mary Magee} and Rutherford, {Robert B.}",
year = "2000",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "142--157",
journal = "Behavioral Disorders",
issn = "0198-7429",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders

AU - Kavale, Kenneth A.

AU - Mathur, Sarup

AU - Forness, Steven R.

AU - Quinn, Mary Magee

AU - Rutherford, Robert B.

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - In this discussion of quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis), past criticisms of meta-analysis are reviewed along with the ways in which they have been addressed. The problems associated with synthesizing single-subject research are discussed, particularly the difficulties in obtaining a metric equivalent to the effect size calculated for group-design research. After analyzing recommended approaches, the authors endorse the percentage-of-nonoverlapping-data metric. Their earlier single-subject synthesis showing limited efficacy for social skills instruction is then reviewed. The findings are discussed in relation to the nature of single-subject research, the proper role of research integration, and the influence of subjectivity in interpreting research findings. Finally, possible reasons for disappointing findings regarding the effectiveness of social skills instruction are explored. The authors conclude that, until expressed concerns are remedied, it is neither incorrect nor illogical to question the efficacy of social skills instruction.

AB - In this discussion of quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis), past criticisms of meta-analysis are reviewed along with the ways in which they have been addressed. The problems associated with synthesizing single-subject research are discussed, particularly the difficulties in obtaining a metric equivalent to the effect size calculated for group-design research. After analyzing recommended approaches, the authors endorse the percentage-of-nonoverlapping-data metric. Their earlier single-subject synthesis showing limited efficacy for social skills instruction is then reviewed. The findings are discussed in relation to the nature of single-subject research, the proper role of research integration, and the influence of subjectivity in interpreting research findings. Finally, possible reasons for disappointing findings regarding the effectiveness of social skills instruction are explored. The authors conclude that, until expressed concerns are remedied, it is neither incorrect nor illogical to question the efficacy of social skills instruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033074832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033074832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033074832

VL - 25

SP - 142

EP - 157

JO - Behavioral Disorders

JF - Behavioral Disorders

SN - 0198-7429

IS - 2

ER -