Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: Implications for use of unique device identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results

Natalia A. Wilson, Megan Jehn, Sally York, Charles M. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

FDA's Unique Device Identification (UDI) Rule will mandate manufacturers to assign unique identifiers to their marketed devices. UDI use is expected to improve implant documentation and identification. A 2012 American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons membership survey explored revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification processes. 87% of surgeons reported regularly using at least 3 methods to identify failed implants pre-operatively. Median surgeon identification time was 20. min; median staff time was 30. min. 10% of implants could not be identified pre-operatively. 2% could not be identified intra-operatively. UDI in TJA registry and UDI in EMR were indicated practices to best support implant identification and save time. FDA's UDI rule sets the foundation for UDI use in patient care settings as standard practice for implant documentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-255
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Implant identification
  • Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty
  • Unique device identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: Implications for use of unique device identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this