Revised aerodynamics curriculum and instruction for improved student outcomes

Valana Wells, Jenefer Husman, Praveen Shankar, Wen Ting Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of a first course in aerodynamics, revised in both content and methodology, as part of a revamping of the junior-year aeronautics curriculum at Arizona State University, a very large, public institution. The curriculum revision is supported by NASA's E.2 Innovation in Aeronautics Instruction. Curriculum modifications include incorporating computational and visualization software into both lecture and homework assignments. In addition, a discovery approach is taken to presentation of key concepts in which students independently investigate aerodynamic behavior of airfoils and wings using the developed software tools. The intended effect of the revisions is to improve students' motivation and ability to persist in the course and in the program. In order to assess their motivation to learn the material and confidence in their ability to do so, students taking the traditional version of the course (Fall 2008) and revised version (Fall 2009 and Fall 2010) were surveyed regarding their perceived ability to achieve course outcomes and to succeed in the course. Analysis of survey data, along with course grades, shows mixed results. The course intervention appears to have improved students' confidence in their ability to master the course outcomes, but it has done little or nothing to improve their perceptions regarding their ability to succeed in achieving a satisfactory grade in the course. The most significant finding indicates that students' selfperception of their ability to master course material and to succeed in the class was virtually uncorrelated with their actual success in the class for students taking the traditional version of the course. In contrast, by the fall of 2010, there is a strong correlation between students' selfperception of their abilities and their performance in the class.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Curricula
Aerodynamics
Students
Aviation
Airfoils
NASA
Visualization
Innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Revised aerodynamics curriculum and instruction for improved student outcomes. / Wells, Valana; Husman, Jenefer; Shankar, Praveen; Chung, Wen Ting.

In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f13d764b12e24bfaa68ff1b53e63e68e,
title = "Revised aerodynamics curriculum and instruction for improved student outcomes",
abstract = "This paper describes the implementation of a first course in aerodynamics, revised in both content and methodology, as part of a revamping of the junior-year aeronautics curriculum at Arizona State University, a very large, public institution. The curriculum revision is supported by NASA's E.2 Innovation in Aeronautics Instruction. Curriculum modifications include incorporating computational and visualization software into both lecture and homework assignments. In addition, a discovery approach is taken to presentation of key concepts in which students independently investigate aerodynamic behavior of airfoils and wings using the developed software tools. The intended effect of the revisions is to improve students' motivation and ability to persist in the course and in the program. In order to assess their motivation to learn the material and confidence in their ability to do so, students taking the traditional version of the course (Fall 2008) and revised version (Fall 2009 and Fall 2010) were surveyed regarding their perceived ability to achieve course outcomes and to succeed in the course. Analysis of survey data, along with course grades, shows mixed results. The course intervention appears to have improved students' confidence in their ability to master the course outcomes, but it has done little or nothing to improve their perceptions regarding their ability to succeed in achieving a satisfactory grade in the course. The most significant finding indicates that students' selfperception of their ability to master course material and to succeed in the class was virtually uncorrelated with their actual success in the class for students taking the traditional version of the course. In contrast, by the fall of 2010, there is a strong correlation between students' selfperception of their abilities and their performance in the class.",
author = "Valana Wells and Jenefer Husman and Praveen Shankar and Chung, {Wen Ting}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",
issn = "2153-5965",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revised aerodynamics curriculum and instruction for improved student outcomes

AU - Wells, Valana

AU - Husman, Jenefer

AU - Shankar, Praveen

AU - Chung, Wen Ting

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper describes the implementation of a first course in aerodynamics, revised in both content and methodology, as part of a revamping of the junior-year aeronautics curriculum at Arizona State University, a very large, public institution. The curriculum revision is supported by NASA's E.2 Innovation in Aeronautics Instruction. Curriculum modifications include incorporating computational and visualization software into both lecture and homework assignments. In addition, a discovery approach is taken to presentation of key concepts in which students independently investigate aerodynamic behavior of airfoils and wings using the developed software tools. The intended effect of the revisions is to improve students' motivation and ability to persist in the course and in the program. In order to assess their motivation to learn the material and confidence in their ability to do so, students taking the traditional version of the course (Fall 2008) and revised version (Fall 2009 and Fall 2010) were surveyed regarding their perceived ability to achieve course outcomes and to succeed in the course. Analysis of survey data, along with course grades, shows mixed results. The course intervention appears to have improved students' confidence in their ability to master the course outcomes, but it has done little or nothing to improve their perceptions regarding their ability to succeed in achieving a satisfactory grade in the course. The most significant finding indicates that students' selfperception of their ability to master course material and to succeed in the class was virtually uncorrelated with their actual success in the class for students taking the traditional version of the course. In contrast, by the fall of 2010, there is a strong correlation between students' selfperception of their abilities and their performance in the class.

AB - This paper describes the implementation of a first course in aerodynamics, revised in both content and methodology, as part of a revamping of the junior-year aeronautics curriculum at Arizona State University, a very large, public institution. The curriculum revision is supported by NASA's E.2 Innovation in Aeronautics Instruction. Curriculum modifications include incorporating computational and visualization software into both lecture and homework assignments. In addition, a discovery approach is taken to presentation of key concepts in which students independently investigate aerodynamic behavior of airfoils and wings using the developed software tools. The intended effect of the revisions is to improve students' motivation and ability to persist in the course and in the program. In order to assess their motivation to learn the material and confidence in their ability to do so, students taking the traditional version of the course (Fall 2008) and revised version (Fall 2009 and Fall 2010) were surveyed regarding their perceived ability to achieve course outcomes and to succeed in the course. Analysis of survey data, along with course grades, shows mixed results. The course intervention appears to have improved students' confidence in their ability to master the course outcomes, but it has done little or nothing to improve their perceptions regarding their ability to succeed in achieving a satisfactory grade in the course. The most significant finding indicates that students' selfperception of their ability to master course material and to succeed in the class was virtually uncorrelated with their actual success in the class for students taking the traditional version of the course. In contrast, by the fall of 2010, there is a strong correlation between students' selfperception of their abilities and their performance in the class.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029093745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029093745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029093745

JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

SN - 2153-5965

ER -