Abstract
Tested whether having tokens (Ts) adopt the role of judge reduces cognitive deficits; examined several hypotheses to explain these deficits. In 3 experiments, Ss were asked to remember as many as possible of opinions exchanged in a group interaction with 3 actors. Experiment 1 demonstrated that judging majority members helped gender Ts improve their memory and ruled out self-denigration as a mediator of token deficits. Experiment 2 indicated that judging others was effective regardless of whether the others were said to know about it or not, ruling out insulation from evaluative scrutiny as a viable mediator for the judge role. Experiment 3 suggested the judge role restores completely the Ts, cognitive capacities and ruled out heightened responsibility as an explanation for the improved memory of judges. This work suggests that Ts may perform better if they can restructure cognitively their social environments.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 698-708 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1989 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science