Reversing NIMBY

An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities

O. O. Ibitayo, David Pijawka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past research indicates a dismal success rate in the siting of hazardous-waste management facilities. The observation that some facilities have been sited, however, suggests that the siting of these locally unwanted environmental facilities may not be an intractable problem. In this paper, based on a national survey of state siting attempts over the past decade, the strategies adopted by states and the factors and combination of factors associated with the few successful outcomes are examined. The data indicate that public trust (especially in the facility developer), early and continuous public involvement in the facility siting process, and an adaptive strategy that involves incorporating citizens' concerns into siting and operation decisions are associated with a higher likelihood of siting success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-389
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume17
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

not in my back yard response
waste facility
hazardous waste
waste management
public
citizen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Reversing NIMBY : An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities. / Ibitayo, O. O.; Pijawka, David.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1999, p. 379-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bfe8f0c70914587a263e1f9f03d0a59,
title = "Reversing NIMBY: An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities",
abstract = "Past research indicates a dismal success rate in the siting of hazardous-waste management facilities. The observation that some facilities have been sited, however, suggests that the siting of these locally unwanted environmental facilities may not be an intractable problem. In this paper, based on a national survey of state siting attempts over the past decade, the strategies adopted by states and the factors and combination of factors associated with the few successful outcomes are examined. The data indicate that public trust (especially in the facility developer), early and continuous public involvement in the facility siting process, and an adaptive strategy that involves incorporating citizens' concerns into siting and operation decisions are associated with a higher likelihood of siting success.",
author = "Ibitayo, {O. O.} and David Pijawka",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "379--389",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reversing NIMBY

T2 - An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities

AU - Ibitayo, O. O.

AU - Pijawka, David

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Past research indicates a dismal success rate in the siting of hazardous-waste management facilities. The observation that some facilities have been sited, however, suggests that the siting of these locally unwanted environmental facilities may not be an intractable problem. In this paper, based on a national survey of state siting attempts over the past decade, the strategies adopted by states and the factors and combination of factors associated with the few successful outcomes are examined. The data indicate that public trust (especially in the facility developer), early and continuous public involvement in the facility siting process, and an adaptive strategy that involves incorporating citizens' concerns into siting and operation decisions are associated with a higher likelihood of siting success.

AB - Past research indicates a dismal success rate in the siting of hazardous-waste management facilities. The observation that some facilities have been sited, however, suggests that the siting of these locally unwanted environmental facilities may not be an intractable problem. In this paper, based on a national survey of state siting attempts over the past decade, the strategies adopted by states and the factors and combination of factors associated with the few successful outcomes are examined. The data indicate that public trust (especially in the facility developer), early and continuous public involvement in the facility siting process, and an adaptive strategy that involves incorporating citizens' concerns into siting and operation decisions are associated with a higher likelihood of siting success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032846974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032846974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 379

EP - 389

JO - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

JF - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 4

ER -