47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What explains the success and failure of radical right parties over time and across countries? This article presents a new theory of the radical right that emphasizes its reactive nature and views it as backlash against the political successes of minorities and concessions extracted on their behalf. Unlike approaches that focus on competition between the extreme and mainstream parties, the theory stresses the dynamics between radical right and non-proximate parties that promote minority rights. Most notably, it derives the salience of identity issues in party politics from the polarization of the party system. The theory is tested with a new party-election-level dataset covering all post-communist democracies over the past 20 years. The results provide strong support for the theory and show that the rise and fall of radical right parties is shaped by the politics of minority accommodation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1738-1765
Number of pages28
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume47
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 2014

Fingerprint

retaliation
minority
minority rights
party politics
party system
concession
polarization
accommodation
election
democracy
politics

Keywords

  • coalitions
  • ethnic minorities
  • polarization
  • radical right parties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Revenge of the Radical Right. / Bustikova-Siroky, Lenka.

In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 47, No. 12, 11.10.2014, p. 1738-1765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ae27443374c4f73b2d22e2930648430,
title = "Revenge of the Radical Right",
abstract = "What explains the success and failure of radical right parties over time and across countries? This article presents a new theory of the radical right that emphasizes its reactive nature and views it as backlash against the political successes of minorities and concessions extracted on their behalf. Unlike approaches that focus on competition between the extreme and mainstream parties, the theory stresses the dynamics between radical right and non-proximate parties that promote minority rights. Most notably, it derives the salience of identity issues in party politics from the polarization of the party system. The theory is tested with a new party-election-level dataset covering all post-communist democracies over the past 20 years. The results provide strong support for the theory and show that the rise and fall of radical right parties is shaped by the politics of minority accommodation.",
keywords = "coalitions, ethnic minorities, polarization, radical right parties",
author = "Lenka Bustikova-Siroky",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0010414013516069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1738--1765",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revenge of the Radical Right

AU - Bustikova-Siroky, Lenka

PY - 2014/10/11

Y1 - 2014/10/11

N2 - What explains the success and failure of radical right parties over time and across countries? This article presents a new theory of the radical right that emphasizes its reactive nature and views it as backlash against the political successes of minorities and concessions extracted on their behalf. Unlike approaches that focus on competition between the extreme and mainstream parties, the theory stresses the dynamics between radical right and non-proximate parties that promote minority rights. Most notably, it derives the salience of identity issues in party politics from the polarization of the party system. The theory is tested with a new party-election-level dataset covering all post-communist democracies over the past 20 years. The results provide strong support for the theory and show that the rise and fall of radical right parties is shaped by the politics of minority accommodation.

AB - What explains the success and failure of radical right parties over time and across countries? This article presents a new theory of the radical right that emphasizes its reactive nature and views it as backlash against the political successes of minorities and concessions extracted on their behalf. Unlike approaches that focus on competition between the extreme and mainstream parties, the theory stresses the dynamics between radical right and non-proximate parties that promote minority rights. Most notably, it derives the salience of identity issues in party politics from the polarization of the party system. The theory is tested with a new party-election-level dataset covering all post-communist democracies over the past 20 years. The results provide strong support for the theory and show that the rise and fall of radical right parties is shaped by the politics of minority accommodation.

KW - coalitions

KW - ethnic minorities

KW - polarization

KW - radical right parties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900017457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900017457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414013516069

DO - 10.1177/0010414013516069

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84900017457

VL - 47

SP - 1738

EP - 1765

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 12

ER -