Rethinking the progress bar

Chris Harrison, Brian Amento, Anastasia Kuznetsov, Robert Bell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Progress bars are prevalent in modern user interfaces. Typically, a linear function is employed such that the progress of the bar is directly proportional to how much work has been completed. However, numerous factors cause progress bars to proceed at non-linear rates. Additionally, humans perceive time in a non-linear way. This paper explores the impact of various progress bar behaviors on user perception of process duration. The results are used to suggest several design considerations that can make progress bars appear faster and ultimately improve users' computing experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationUIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology
Pages115-118
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2007 - Newport, RI, United States
Duration: Oct 7 2007Oct 10 2007

Other

Other20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2007
CountryUnited States
CityNewport, RI
Period10/7/0710/10/07

Fingerprint

User interfaces

Keywords

  • Duration neglect
  • Human-centric
  • Peak-and-end
  • Progress bar
  • Time perception
  • User interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Harrison, C., Amento, B., Kuznetsov, A., & Bell, R. (2007). Rethinking the progress bar. In UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology (pp. 115-118) https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294231

Rethinking the progress bar. / Harrison, Chris; Amento, Brian; Kuznetsov, Anastasia; Bell, Robert.

UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology. 2007. p. 115-118.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harrison, C, Amento, B, Kuznetsov, A & Bell, R 2007, Rethinking the progress bar. in UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology. pp. 115-118, 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2007, Newport, RI, United States, 10/7/07. https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294231
Harrison C, Amento B, Kuznetsov A, Bell R. Rethinking the progress bar. In UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology. 2007. p. 115-118 https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294231
Harrison, Chris ; Amento, Brian ; Kuznetsov, Anastasia ; Bell, Robert. / Rethinking the progress bar. UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology. 2007. pp. 115-118
@inproceedings{40485c0bf5bd4c3a967d54d14be09298,
title = "Rethinking the progress bar",
abstract = "Progress bars are prevalent in modern user interfaces. Typically, a linear function is employed such that the progress of the bar is directly proportional to how much work has been completed. However, numerous factors cause progress bars to proceed at non-linear rates. Additionally, humans perceive time in a non-linear way. This paper explores the impact of various progress bar behaviors on user perception of process duration. The results are used to suggest several design considerations that can make progress bars appear faster and ultimately improve users' computing experience.",
keywords = "Duration neglect, Human-centric, Peak-and-end, Progress bar, Time perception, User interface",
author = "Chris Harrison and Brian Amento and Anastasia Kuznetsov and Robert Bell",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1145/1294211.1294231",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "115--118",
booktitle = "UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Rethinking the progress bar

AU - Harrison, Chris

AU - Amento, Brian

AU - Kuznetsov, Anastasia

AU - Bell, Robert

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Progress bars are prevalent in modern user interfaces. Typically, a linear function is employed such that the progress of the bar is directly proportional to how much work has been completed. However, numerous factors cause progress bars to proceed at non-linear rates. Additionally, humans perceive time in a non-linear way. This paper explores the impact of various progress bar behaviors on user perception of process duration. The results are used to suggest several design considerations that can make progress bars appear faster and ultimately improve users' computing experience.

AB - Progress bars are prevalent in modern user interfaces. Typically, a linear function is employed such that the progress of the bar is directly proportional to how much work has been completed. However, numerous factors cause progress bars to proceed at non-linear rates. Additionally, humans perceive time in a non-linear way. This paper explores the impact of various progress bar behaviors on user perception of process duration. The results are used to suggest several design considerations that can make progress bars appear faster and ultimately improve users' computing experience.

KW - Duration neglect

KW - Human-centric

KW - Peak-and-end

KW - Progress bar

KW - Time perception

KW - User interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149095423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149095423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1294211.1294231

DO - 10.1145/1294211.1294231

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 115

EP - 118

BT - UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology

ER -