Abstract

While technological innovation is an implicit element of any plausible strategy for responding to climate change, the complexity of innovation processes has not been adequately accounted for in such strategies. Using many examples from different areas of technological innovation, we show that the inevitable unintended and unforeseeable consequences of innovation likely make it impossible to strategically steer the global energy system in desired directions. Given this conclusion, we then look at technological complexity in terms of a simple three-level schema of sociotechnical change. This perspective points towards innovation policies that focus on long-term, incremental advance at the level of individual technologies, and on public policies that use a public goods-public works rationale to justify government investments in the needed innovations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-221
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Innovation
technical innovation
innovation
energy
innovation policy
public policy
climate change
Public works
Climate change

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Energy systems
  • Innovation
  • Public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fuel Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Rethinking innovation for decarbonizing energy systems. / Alic, John A.; Sarewitz, Daniel.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 21, 01.11.2016, p. 212-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{fea29488e88b40f8ac8722947ec91c0b,
title = "Rethinking innovation for decarbonizing energy systems",
abstract = "While technological innovation is an implicit element of any plausible strategy for responding to climate change, the complexity of innovation processes has not been adequately accounted for in such strategies. Using many examples from different areas of technological innovation, we show that the inevitable unintended and unforeseeable consequences of innovation likely make it impossible to strategically steer the global energy system in desired directions. Given this conclusion, we then look at technological complexity in terms of a simple three-level schema of sociotechnical change. This perspective points towards innovation policies that focus on long-term, incremental advance at the level of individual technologies, and on public policies that use a public goods-public works rationale to justify government investments in the needed innovations.",
keywords = "Climate change, Energy systems, Innovation, Public policy",
author = "Alic, {John A.} and Daniel Sarewitz",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "212--221",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking innovation for decarbonizing energy systems

AU - Alic, John A.

AU - Sarewitz, Daniel

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - While technological innovation is an implicit element of any plausible strategy for responding to climate change, the complexity of innovation processes has not been adequately accounted for in such strategies. Using many examples from different areas of technological innovation, we show that the inevitable unintended and unforeseeable consequences of innovation likely make it impossible to strategically steer the global energy system in desired directions. Given this conclusion, we then look at technological complexity in terms of a simple three-level schema of sociotechnical change. This perspective points towards innovation policies that focus on long-term, incremental advance at the level of individual technologies, and on public policies that use a public goods-public works rationale to justify government investments in the needed innovations.

AB - While technological innovation is an implicit element of any plausible strategy for responding to climate change, the complexity of innovation processes has not been adequately accounted for in such strategies. Using many examples from different areas of technological innovation, we show that the inevitable unintended and unforeseeable consequences of innovation likely make it impossible to strategically steer the global energy system in desired directions. Given this conclusion, we then look at technological complexity in terms of a simple three-level schema of sociotechnical change. This perspective points towards innovation policies that focus on long-term, incremental advance at the level of individual technologies, and on public policies that use a public goods-public works rationale to justify government investments in the needed innovations.

KW - Climate change

KW - Energy systems

KW - Innovation

KW - Public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983504284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983504284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.005

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 212

EP - 221

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -