Retaining faculty in academic medicine: The impact of career development programs for women

Shine Chang, Page S. Morahan, Diane Magrane, Deborah Helitzer, Hwa Young Lee, Sharon Newbill, Ho Lan Peng, Michele Guindani, Gina Cardinali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: For more than two decades, national career development programs (CDPs) have addressed underrepresentation of women faculty in academic medicine through career and leadership curricula. We evaluated CDP participation impact on retention. Methods: We used Association of American Medical Colleges data to compare 3268 women attending CDPs from 1988 to 2008 with 17,834 women and 40,319 men nonparticipant faculty similar to CDP participants in degree, academic rank, first year of appointment in rank, and home institution. Measuring from first year in rank to departure from last position held or December 2009 (study end date), we used Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox survival analysis adjusted for age, degree, tenure, and department; and 10-year rates to compare retention. Results: CDP participants were significantly less likely to leave academic medicine than their peers for up to 8 years after appointment as Assistant and Associate Professors. Full Professor participants were significantly less likely to leave than non-CDP women. Men left less often than non-CDP women at every rank. Participants attending more than one CDP left less often than those attending one, but results varied by rank. Patterns of switching institutions after 10 years varied by rank; CDP participants switched significantly less often than men at Assistant and Associate Professor levels and significantly less often than non-CDP women among Assistant Professors. Full Professors switched at equal rates. Conclusion: National CDPs appear to offer retention advantage to women faculty, with implications for faculty performance and capacity building within academic medicine. Intervals of retention advantage for CDP participants suggest vulnerable periods for intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-696
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicine
Appointments and Schedules
Capacity Building
American Medical Association
Survival Analysis
Curriculum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Retaining faculty in academic medicine : The impact of career development programs for women. / Chang, Shine; Morahan, Page S.; Magrane, Diane; Helitzer, Deborah; Lee, Hwa Young; Newbill, Sharon; Peng, Ho Lan; Guindani, Michele; Cardinali, Gina.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 687-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, S, Morahan, PS, Magrane, D, Helitzer, D, Lee, HY, Newbill, S, Peng, HL, Guindani, M & Cardinali, G 2016, 'Retaining faculty in academic medicine: The impact of career development programs for women', Journal of Women's Health, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5608
Chang, Shine ; Morahan, Page S. ; Magrane, Diane ; Helitzer, Deborah ; Lee, Hwa Young ; Newbill, Sharon ; Peng, Ho Lan ; Guindani, Michele ; Cardinali, Gina. / Retaining faculty in academic medicine : The impact of career development programs for women. In: Journal of Women's Health. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 687-696.
@article{ab0abbb5a5a648b3bb0f44bf3b47214e,
title = "Retaining faculty in academic medicine: The impact of career development programs for women",
abstract = "Background: For more than two decades, national career development programs (CDPs) have addressed underrepresentation of women faculty in academic medicine through career and leadership curricula. We evaluated CDP participation impact on retention. Methods: We used Association of American Medical Colleges data to compare 3268 women attending CDPs from 1988 to 2008 with 17,834 women and 40,319 men nonparticipant faculty similar to CDP participants in degree, academic rank, first year of appointment in rank, and home institution. Measuring from first year in rank to departure from last position held or December 2009 (study end date), we used Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox survival analysis adjusted for age, degree, tenure, and department; and 10-year rates to compare retention. Results: CDP participants were significantly less likely to leave academic medicine than their peers for up to 8 years after appointment as Assistant and Associate Professors. Full Professor participants were significantly less likely to leave than non-CDP women. Men left less often than non-CDP women at every rank. Participants attending more than one CDP left less often than those attending one, but results varied by rank. Patterns of switching institutions after 10 years varied by rank; CDP participants switched significantly less often than men at Assistant and Associate Professor levels and significantly less often than non-CDP women among Assistant Professors. Full Professors switched at equal rates. Conclusion: National CDPs appear to offer retention advantage to women faculty, with implications for faculty performance and capacity building within academic medicine. Intervals of retention advantage for CDP participants suggest vulnerable periods for intervention.",
author = "Shine Chang and Morahan, {Page S.} and Diane Magrane and Deborah Helitzer and Lee, {Hwa Young} and Sharon Newbill and Peng, {Ho Lan} and Michele Guindani and Gina Cardinali",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2015.5608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "687--696",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retaining faculty in academic medicine

T2 - The impact of career development programs for women

AU - Chang, Shine

AU - Morahan, Page S.

AU - Magrane, Diane

AU - Helitzer, Deborah

AU - Lee, Hwa Young

AU - Newbill, Sharon

AU - Peng, Ho Lan

AU - Guindani, Michele

AU - Cardinali, Gina

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Background: For more than two decades, national career development programs (CDPs) have addressed underrepresentation of women faculty in academic medicine through career and leadership curricula. We evaluated CDP participation impact on retention. Methods: We used Association of American Medical Colleges data to compare 3268 women attending CDPs from 1988 to 2008 with 17,834 women and 40,319 men nonparticipant faculty similar to CDP participants in degree, academic rank, first year of appointment in rank, and home institution. Measuring from first year in rank to departure from last position held or December 2009 (study end date), we used Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox survival analysis adjusted for age, degree, tenure, and department; and 10-year rates to compare retention. Results: CDP participants were significantly less likely to leave academic medicine than their peers for up to 8 years after appointment as Assistant and Associate Professors. Full Professor participants were significantly less likely to leave than non-CDP women. Men left less often than non-CDP women at every rank. Participants attending more than one CDP left less often than those attending one, but results varied by rank. Patterns of switching institutions after 10 years varied by rank; CDP participants switched significantly less often than men at Assistant and Associate Professor levels and significantly less often than non-CDP women among Assistant Professors. Full Professors switched at equal rates. Conclusion: National CDPs appear to offer retention advantage to women faculty, with implications for faculty performance and capacity building within academic medicine. Intervals of retention advantage for CDP participants suggest vulnerable periods for intervention.

AB - Background: For more than two decades, national career development programs (CDPs) have addressed underrepresentation of women faculty in academic medicine through career and leadership curricula. We evaluated CDP participation impact on retention. Methods: We used Association of American Medical Colleges data to compare 3268 women attending CDPs from 1988 to 2008 with 17,834 women and 40,319 men nonparticipant faculty similar to CDP participants in degree, academic rank, first year of appointment in rank, and home institution. Measuring from first year in rank to departure from last position held or December 2009 (study end date), we used Kaplan-Meier curves; Cox survival analysis adjusted for age, degree, tenure, and department; and 10-year rates to compare retention. Results: CDP participants were significantly less likely to leave academic medicine than their peers for up to 8 years after appointment as Assistant and Associate Professors. Full Professor participants were significantly less likely to leave than non-CDP women. Men left less often than non-CDP women at every rank. Participants attending more than one CDP left less often than those attending one, but results varied by rank. Patterns of switching institutions after 10 years varied by rank; CDP participants switched significantly less often than men at Assistant and Associate Professor levels and significantly less often than non-CDP women among Assistant Professors. Full Professors switched at equal rates. Conclusion: National CDPs appear to offer retention advantage to women faculty, with implications for faculty performance and capacity building within academic medicine. Intervals of retention advantage for CDP participants suggest vulnerable periods for intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978435075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978435075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2015.5608

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2015.5608

M3 - Article

C2 - 27058451

AN - SCOPUS:84978435075

VL - 25

SP - 687

EP - 696

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 7

ER -