Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments

Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands

Miklós Lukovics, Steven M. Flipse, Beáta Udvari, Erik Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, the notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has been gaining momentum in policy and practice. The main claim of RRI is that social, ethical and environmental aspects should be taken into consideration in scientific research and innovation activities. Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) is one of the first tools emerging from RRI research that is designed to help research, development and innovation actors practically implement key aspects of RRI in their daily work. Since its inception in 2006, results from multiple international studies have demonstrated the possibility and utility of STIR, albeit in developed countries. In 2015, a STIR pilot study was conducted in the developing region of Szeged, Hungary. Its results are similar, but far from those achieved in developed countries. In this paper we explore what, if any, role the innovation environment plays in the outcomes of the implementation of RRI practices such as STIR. We analyze STIR results and effectiveness in the wider context of the national innovation environments of Hungary and the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that the innovation environment can affect the success and effectiveness of approaches such as STIR. As a policy recommendation, we therefore recommend that RRI approaches such as STIR be adapted to the innovation environment of the country concerned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-182
Number of pages11
JournalTechnology in Society
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hungary
Netherlands
Innovation
innovation
The Netherlands
innovation research
research results
research and development
Momentum

Keywords

  • Hungary
  • Innovation environment
  • Responsible research and innovation
  • Socio-Technical Integration
  • The Netherlands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments : Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands. / Lukovics, Miklós; Flipse, Steven M.; Udvari, Beáta; Fisher, Erik.

In: Technology in Society, Vol. 51, 01.11.2017, p. 172-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec8503560e904937862dee0f7518a465,
title = "Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments: Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands",
abstract = "Recently, the notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has been gaining momentum in policy and practice. The main claim of RRI is that social, ethical and environmental aspects should be taken into consideration in scientific research and innovation activities. Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) is one of the first tools emerging from RRI research that is designed to help research, development and innovation actors practically implement key aspects of RRI in their daily work. Since its inception in 2006, results from multiple international studies have demonstrated the possibility and utility of STIR, albeit in developed countries. In 2015, a STIR pilot study was conducted in the developing region of Szeged, Hungary. Its results are similar, but far from those achieved in developed countries. In this paper we explore what, if any, role the innovation environment plays in the outcomes of the implementation of RRI practices such as STIR. We analyze STIR results and effectiveness in the wider context of the national innovation environments of Hungary and the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that the innovation environment can affect the success and effectiveness of approaches such as STIR. As a policy recommendation, we therefore recommend that RRI approaches such as STIR be adapted to the innovation environment of the country concerned.",
keywords = "Hungary, Innovation environment, Responsible research and innovation, Socio-Technical Integration, The Netherlands",
author = "Mikl{\'o}s Lukovics and Flipse, {Steven M.} and Be{\'a}ta Udvari and Erik Fisher",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "172--182",
journal = "Technology in Society",
issn = "0160-791X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments

T2 - Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands

AU - Lukovics, Miklós

AU - Flipse, Steven M.

AU - Udvari, Beáta

AU - Fisher, Erik

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Recently, the notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has been gaining momentum in policy and practice. The main claim of RRI is that social, ethical and environmental aspects should be taken into consideration in scientific research and innovation activities. Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) is one of the first tools emerging from RRI research that is designed to help research, development and innovation actors practically implement key aspects of RRI in their daily work. Since its inception in 2006, results from multiple international studies have demonstrated the possibility and utility of STIR, albeit in developed countries. In 2015, a STIR pilot study was conducted in the developing region of Szeged, Hungary. Its results are similar, but far from those achieved in developed countries. In this paper we explore what, if any, role the innovation environment plays in the outcomes of the implementation of RRI practices such as STIR. We analyze STIR results and effectiveness in the wider context of the national innovation environments of Hungary and the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that the innovation environment can affect the success and effectiveness of approaches such as STIR. As a policy recommendation, we therefore recommend that RRI approaches such as STIR be adapted to the innovation environment of the country concerned.

AB - Recently, the notion of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has been gaining momentum in policy and practice. The main claim of RRI is that social, ethical and environmental aspects should be taken into consideration in scientific research and innovation activities. Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) is one of the first tools emerging from RRI research that is designed to help research, development and innovation actors practically implement key aspects of RRI in their daily work. Since its inception in 2006, results from multiple international studies have demonstrated the possibility and utility of STIR, albeit in developed countries. In 2015, a STIR pilot study was conducted in the developing region of Szeged, Hungary. Its results are similar, but far from those achieved in developed countries. In this paper we explore what, if any, role the innovation environment plays in the outcomes of the implementation of RRI practices such as STIR. We analyze STIR results and effectiveness in the wider context of the national innovation environments of Hungary and the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that the innovation environment can affect the success and effectiveness of approaches such as STIR. As a policy recommendation, we therefore recommend that RRI approaches such as STIR be adapted to the innovation environment of the country concerned.

KW - Hungary

KW - Innovation environment

KW - Responsible research and innovation

KW - Socio-Technical Integration

KW - The Netherlands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032708062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032708062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 172

EP - 182

JO - Technology in Society

JF - Technology in Society

SN - 0160-791X

ER -