Responsibility and weil-being

Resource integration under responsibilization in expert services

Laurel Anderson, Jelena Spanjol, Josephine Go Jefferies, Amy Ostrom, Courtney Nations Baker, Sterling A. Bone, Hilary Downey, Martin Mende, Justine M. Rapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Responsibilization, or the shift of functions and risks from providers and producers to consumers, has become an increasingly common policy in service systems and marketplaces (e.g., financial, health, governmental). Because responsibilization is often considered synonymous with consumer agency and well-being, the authors take a transformative service research perspective and draw on resource integration literature to investigate whether responsibilization is truly associated with well-being. The authors focus on expert services, for which responsibilization concerns are particularly salient, and question whether this expanding policy is in the public interest. In the process, they develop a conceptualization of resource integration under responsibilization that includes three levels of actors (consumer, provider, and service system), the identification of structural tensions surrounding resource integration, and three categories of resource-integration practices (access, appropriation, and management) necessary to negotiate responsibilization. The findings have important implications for providers, public and institutional policy makers, and service systems, all of which must pay more active attention to the challenges consumers face in negotiating responsibilization and the resulting well-being outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-279
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Public Policy and Marketing
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Responsibility
Resources
Well-being
Service system
Appropriation
Politicians
Conceptualization
Financial health
Negotiating
Public interest

Keywords

  • Expert services system
  • Resource integration
  • Responsibilization
  • Transformative service research
  • Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

Responsibility and weil-being : Resource integration under responsibilization in expert services. / Anderson, Laurel; Spanjol, Jelena; Jefferies, Josephine Go; Ostrom, Amy; Baker, Courtney Nations; Bone, Sterling A.; Downey, Hilary; Mende, Martin; Rapp, Justine M.

In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.09.2016, p. 262-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, Laurel ; Spanjol, Jelena ; Jefferies, Josephine Go ; Ostrom, Amy ; Baker, Courtney Nations ; Bone, Sterling A. ; Downey, Hilary ; Mende, Martin ; Rapp, Justine M. / Responsibility and weil-being : Resource integration under responsibilization in expert services. In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 2016 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 262-279.
@article{3fe2f3f0e96745c4bd9b3a66fc8e1fb7,
title = "Responsibility and weil-being: Resource integration under responsibilization in expert services",
abstract = "Responsibilization, or the shift of functions and risks from providers and producers to consumers, has become an increasingly common policy in service systems and marketplaces (e.g., financial, health, governmental). Because responsibilization is often considered synonymous with consumer agency and well-being, the authors take a transformative service research perspective and draw on resource integration literature to investigate whether responsibilization is truly associated with well-being. The authors focus on expert services, for which responsibilization concerns are particularly salient, and question whether this expanding policy is in the public interest. In the process, they develop a conceptualization of resource integration under responsibilization that includes three levels of actors (consumer, provider, and service system), the identification of structural tensions surrounding resource integration, and three categories of resource-integration practices (access, appropriation, and management) necessary to negotiate responsibilization. The findings have important implications for providers, public and institutional policy makers, and service systems, all of which must pay more active attention to the challenges consumers face in negotiating responsibilization and the resulting well-being outcomes.",
keywords = "Expert services system, Resource integration, Responsibilization, Transformative service research, Well-being",
author = "Laurel Anderson and Jelena Spanjol and Jefferies, {Josephine Go} and Amy Ostrom and Baker, {Courtney Nations} and Bone, {Sterling A.} and Hilary Downey and Martin Mende and Rapp, {Justine M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1509/jppm.15.140",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "262--279",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy and Marketing",
issn = "0743-9156",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsibility and weil-being

T2 - Resource integration under responsibilization in expert services

AU - Anderson, Laurel

AU - Spanjol, Jelena

AU - Jefferies, Josephine Go

AU - Ostrom, Amy

AU - Baker, Courtney Nations

AU - Bone, Sterling A.

AU - Downey, Hilary

AU - Mende, Martin

AU - Rapp, Justine M.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Responsibilization, or the shift of functions and risks from providers and producers to consumers, has become an increasingly common policy in service systems and marketplaces (e.g., financial, health, governmental). Because responsibilization is often considered synonymous with consumer agency and well-being, the authors take a transformative service research perspective and draw on resource integration literature to investigate whether responsibilization is truly associated with well-being. The authors focus on expert services, for which responsibilization concerns are particularly salient, and question whether this expanding policy is in the public interest. In the process, they develop a conceptualization of resource integration under responsibilization that includes three levels of actors (consumer, provider, and service system), the identification of structural tensions surrounding resource integration, and three categories of resource-integration practices (access, appropriation, and management) necessary to negotiate responsibilization. The findings have important implications for providers, public and institutional policy makers, and service systems, all of which must pay more active attention to the challenges consumers face in negotiating responsibilization and the resulting well-being outcomes.

AB - Responsibilization, or the shift of functions and risks from providers and producers to consumers, has become an increasingly common policy in service systems and marketplaces (e.g., financial, health, governmental). Because responsibilization is often considered synonymous with consumer agency and well-being, the authors take a transformative service research perspective and draw on resource integration literature to investigate whether responsibilization is truly associated with well-being. The authors focus on expert services, for which responsibilization concerns are particularly salient, and question whether this expanding policy is in the public interest. In the process, they develop a conceptualization of resource integration under responsibilization that includes three levels of actors (consumer, provider, and service system), the identification of structural tensions surrounding resource integration, and three categories of resource-integration practices (access, appropriation, and management) necessary to negotiate responsibilization. The findings have important implications for providers, public and institutional policy makers, and service systems, all of which must pay more active attention to the challenges consumers face in negotiating responsibilization and the resulting well-being outcomes.

KW - Expert services system

KW - Resource integration

KW - Responsibilization

KW - Transformative service research

KW - Well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009198558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009198558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1509/jppm.15.140

DO - 10.1509/jppm.15.140

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 262

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

JF - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

SN - 0743-9156

IS - 2

ER -