Respect in Organizations: Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me”

Kristie M. Rogers, Blake Ashforth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research suggests that organizational members highly prize respect but rarely report adequately receiving it. However, there is a lack of theory in organizational behavior regarding what respect actually is and why members prize it. We argue that there are two distinct types of respect: generalized respect is the sense that “we” are all valued in this organization, and particularized respect is the sense that the organization values “me” for particular attributes, behaviors, and achievements. We build a theoretical model of respect, positing antecedents of generalized respect from the sender’s perspective (prestige of social category, climate for generalized respect) and proposed criteria for the evaluation of particularized respect (role, organizational member, and character prototypicality), which is then enacted by the sender and perceived by the receiver. We also articulate how these two types of respect fulfill the receiver’s needs for belonging and status, which facilitates the self-related outcomes of organization-based self-esteem, organizational and role identification, and psychological safety. Finally, we consider generalized and personalized respect jointly and present four combinations of the two types of respect. We argue that the discrepancy between organizational members’ desired and received respect is partially attributable to the challenge of simultaneously enacting or receiving respect for both the “we” and the “me.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1578-1608
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Management
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Climate
Organizational behaviour
Discrepancy
Psychological safety
Prestige
Evaluation
Organization-based self-esteem

Keywords

  • belonging
  • identification
  • identity
  • organization-based self-esteem
  • psychological safety
  • respect
  • status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Respect in Organizations : Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me”. / Rogers, Kristie M.; Ashforth, Blake.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 1578-1608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63b247e5ba524edbb3271f265c6b43c8,
title = "Respect in Organizations: Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me”",
abstract = "Research suggests that organizational members highly prize respect but rarely report adequately receiving it. However, there is a lack of theory in organizational behavior regarding what respect actually is and why members prize it. We argue that there are two distinct types of respect: generalized respect is the sense that “we” are all valued in this organization, and particularized respect is the sense that the organization values “me” for particular attributes, behaviors, and achievements. We build a theoretical model of respect, positing antecedents of generalized respect from the sender’s perspective (prestige of social category, climate for generalized respect) and proposed criteria for the evaluation of particularized respect (role, organizational member, and character prototypicality), which is then enacted by the sender and perceived by the receiver. We also articulate how these two types of respect fulfill the receiver’s needs for belonging and status, which facilitates the self-related outcomes of organization-based self-esteem, organizational and role identification, and psychological safety. Finally, we consider generalized and personalized respect jointly and present four combinations of the two types of respect. We argue that the discrepancy between organizational members’ desired and received respect is partially attributable to the challenge of simultaneously enacting or receiving respect for both the “we” and the “me.”",
keywords = "belonging, identification, identity, organization-based self-esteem, psychological safety, respect, status",
author = "Rogers, {Kristie M.} and Blake Ashforth",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206314557159",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1578--1608",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Respect in Organizations

T2 - Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me”

AU - Rogers, Kristie M.

AU - Ashforth, Blake

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Research suggests that organizational members highly prize respect but rarely report adequately receiving it. However, there is a lack of theory in organizational behavior regarding what respect actually is and why members prize it. We argue that there are two distinct types of respect: generalized respect is the sense that “we” are all valued in this organization, and particularized respect is the sense that the organization values “me” for particular attributes, behaviors, and achievements. We build a theoretical model of respect, positing antecedents of generalized respect from the sender’s perspective (prestige of social category, climate for generalized respect) and proposed criteria for the evaluation of particularized respect (role, organizational member, and character prototypicality), which is then enacted by the sender and perceived by the receiver. We also articulate how these two types of respect fulfill the receiver’s needs for belonging and status, which facilitates the self-related outcomes of organization-based self-esteem, organizational and role identification, and psychological safety. Finally, we consider generalized and personalized respect jointly and present four combinations of the two types of respect. We argue that the discrepancy between organizational members’ desired and received respect is partially attributable to the challenge of simultaneously enacting or receiving respect for both the “we” and the “me.”

AB - Research suggests that organizational members highly prize respect but rarely report adequately receiving it. However, there is a lack of theory in organizational behavior regarding what respect actually is and why members prize it. We argue that there are two distinct types of respect: generalized respect is the sense that “we” are all valued in this organization, and particularized respect is the sense that the organization values “me” for particular attributes, behaviors, and achievements. We build a theoretical model of respect, positing antecedents of generalized respect from the sender’s perspective (prestige of social category, climate for generalized respect) and proposed criteria for the evaluation of particularized respect (role, organizational member, and character prototypicality), which is then enacted by the sender and perceived by the receiver. We also articulate how these two types of respect fulfill the receiver’s needs for belonging and status, which facilitates the self-related outcomes of organization-based self-esteem, organizational and role identification, and psychological safety. Finally, we consider generalized and personalized respect jointly and present four combinations of the two types of respect. We argue that the discrepancy between organizational members’ desired and received respect is partially attributable to the challenge of simultaneously enacting or receiving respect for both the “we” and the “me.”

KW - belonging

KW - identification

KW - identity

KW - organization-based self-esteem

KW - psychological safety

KW - respect

KW - status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016957474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016957474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206314557159

DO - 10.1177/0149206314557159

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016957474

VL - 43

SP - 1578

EP - 1608

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 5

ER -