Resonance within and between linguistic beings

Stephen Goldinger, Tamiko Azuma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) deserve appreciation for their cogent argument that dialogue merits greater scientific consideration. Current models make little contact with behaviors of dialogue, motivating the interactive alignment theory. However, the theory is not truly "mechanistic." A full account requires both representations and processes bringing those representations into harmony. We suggest that Grossberg's (1980) adaptive resonance theory may naturally conform to the principles of dialogue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-200
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resonance within and between linguistic beings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this