Resolving Empirical Inconsistencies Concerning Priming, Frequency, and Nonword Foils in Lexical Decision

Gregory O. Stone, Guy C. Van Orden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two inconsistencies in the priming literature were investigated. Schuberth and Eimas (1977) reported that semantic priming and frequency have additive effects on RTs in lexical decision tasks, whereas Becker (1979) reported that the same two factors interact. Furthermore, Shulman and Davison (1977) reported greater priming given legal vs. illegal nonword foils, whereas Stone and Van Orden (1989) found no difference in the same situation. The present study investigated these inconsistencies by manipulating nonword foil lexicality (i.e., the similarity of nonword foils to words), semantic priming, and word frequency in two lexical decision experiments. In a facilitation dominant, controlled priming experiment (i.e., long prime-target onset asynchronies and a high proportion of related primes), the priming benefit (related vs. neutral primes) and the significant interaction of priming benefit and word frequency were unaffected by nonword foil lexicality. Given pronounceable nonword foils, there were no priming costs (unrelated vs. neutral primes). However, given illegal nonword foils, words preceded by unrelated primes were recognized more rapidly than words preceded by neutral primes (a “reversed� cost). In an automatic priming experiment (i.e., brief prime-target onset asynchronies and a lower proportion of related primes), there was no significant interaction of priming benefit and frequency. Implications for resolving the two empirical inconsistencies are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-324
Number of pages30
JournalLanguage and speech
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1992

Fingerprint

Semantics
Costs and Cost Analysis
experiment
semantics
costs
interaction
Inconsistency
Lexical Decision
Priming
Nonwords
Experiment

Keywords

  • lexical decision
  • semantic priming
  • visual word recognition
  • word frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Resolving Empirical Inconsistencies Concerning Priming, Frequency, and Nonword Foils in Lexical Decision. / Stone, Gregory O.; Van Orden, Guy C.

In: Language and speech, Vol. 35, No. 3, 07.1992, p. 295-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f227cd8f61d9454eb3368c7373d17581,
title = "Resolving Empirical Inconsistencies Concerning Priming, Frequency, and Nonword Foils in Lexical Decision",
abstract = "Two inconsistencies in the priming literature were investigated. Schuberth and Eimas (1977) reported that semantic priming and frequency have additive effects on RTs in lexical decision tasks, whereas Becker (1979) reported that the same two factors interact. Furthermore, Shulman and Davison (1977) reported greater priming given legal vs. illegal nonword foils, whereas Stone and Van Orden (1989) found no difference in the same situation. The present study investigated these inconsistencies by manipulating nonword foil lexicality (i.e., the similarity of nonword foils to words), semantic priming, and word frequency in two lexical decision experiments. In a facilitation dominant, controlled priming experiment (i.e., long prime-target onset asynchronies and a high proportion of related primes), the priming benefit (related vs. neutral primes) and the significant interaction of priming benefit and word frequency were unaffected by nonword foil lexicality. Given pronounceable nonword foils, there were no priming costs (unrelated vs. neutral primes). However, given illegal nonword foils, words preceded by unrelated primes were recognized more rapidly than words preceded by neutral primes (a {\^a}€œreversed{\^a}€� cost). In an automatic priming experiment (i.e., brief prime-target onset asynchronies and a lower proportion of related primes), there was no significant interaction of priming benefit and frequency. Implications for resolving the two empirical inconsistencies are discussed.",
keywords = "lexical decision, semantic priming, visual word recognition, word frequency",
author = "Stone, {Gregory O.} and {Van Orden}, {Guy C.}",
year = "1992",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/002383099203500302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "295--324",
journal = "Language and Speech",
issn = "0023-8309",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolving Empirical Inconsistencies Concerning Priming, Frequency, and Nonword Foils in Lexical Decision

AU - Stone, Gregory O.

AU - Van Orden, Guy C.

PY - 1992/7

Y1 - 1992/7

N2 - Two inconsistencies in the priming literature were investigated. Schuberth and Eimas (1977) reported that semantic priming and frequency have additive effects on RTs in lexical decision tasks, whereas Becker (1979) reported that the same two factors interact. Furthermore, Shulman and Davison (1977) reported greater priming given legal vs. illegal nonword foils, whereas Stone and Van Orden (1989) found no difference in the same situation. The present study investigated these inconsistencies by manipulating nonword foil lexicality (i.e., the similarity of nonword foils to words), semantic priming, and word frequency in two lexical decision experiments. In a facilitation dominant, controlled priming experiment (i.e., long prime-target onset asynchronies and a high proportion of related primes), the priming benefit (related vs. neutral primes) and the significant interaction of priming benefit and word frequency were unaffected by nonword foil lexicality. Given pronounceable nonword foils, there were no priming costs (unrelated vs. neutral primes). However, given illegal nonword foils, words preceded by unrelated primes were recognized more rapidly than words preceded by neutral primes (a “reversed� cost). In an automatic priming experiment (i.e., brief prime-target onset asynchronies and a lower proportion of related primes), there was no significant interaction of priming benefit and frequency. Implications for resolving the two empirical inconsistencies are discussed.

AB - Two inconsistencies in the priming literature were investigated. Schuberth and Eimas (1977) reported that semantic priming and frequency have additive effects on RTs in lexical decision tasks, whereas Becker (1979) reported that the same two factors interact. Furthermore, Shulman and Davison (1977) reported greater priming given legal vs. illegal nonword foils, whereas Stone and Van Orden (1989) found no difference in the same situation. The present study investigated these inconsistencies by manipulating nonword foil lexicality (i.e., the similarity of nonword foils to words), semantic priming, and word frequency in two lexical decision experiments. In a facilitation dominant, controlled priming experiment (i.e., long prime-target onset asynchronies and a high proportion of related primes), the priming benefit (related vs. neutral primes) and the significant interaction of priming benefit and word frequency were unaffected by nonword foil lexicality. Given pronounceable nonword foils, there were no priming costs (unrelated vs. neutral primes). However, given illegal nonword foils, words preceded by unrelated primes were recognized more rapidly than words preceded by neutral primes (a “reversed� cost). In an automatic priming experiment (i.e., brief prime-target onset asynchronies and a lower proportion of related primes), there was no significant interaction of priming benefit and frequency. Implications for resolving the two empirical inconsistencies are discussed.

KW - lexical decision

KW - semantic priming

KW - visual word recognition

KW - word frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248847944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248847944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002383099203500302

DO - 10.1177/002383099203500302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248847944

VL - 35

SP - 295

EP - 324

JO - Language and Speech

JF - Language and Speech

SN - 0023-8309

IS - 3

ER -