Resilient parenting of preschool children at developmental risk

R. Ellingsen, B. L. Baker, J. Blacher, Keith Crnic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Given the great benefits of effective parenting to child development under normal circumstances, and the even greater benefits in the face of risk, it is important to understand why some parents manage to be effective in their interactions with their child despite facing formidable challenges. This study examined factors that promoted effective parenting in the presence of child developmental delay, high child behaviour problems, and low family income. Method: Data were obtained from 232 families at child age 3 and 5 years. Using an adapted ABCX model, we examined three risk domains (child developmental delay, child behaviour problems, and low family income) and three protective factors (mother's education, health, and optimism). The outcome of interest was positive parenting as coded from mother-child interactions. Results: Levels of positive parenting differed across levels of risk. Education and optimism appeared to be protective factors for positive parenting at ages 3 and 5, and health appeared to be an additional protective factor at age 5. There was an interaction between risk and education at age 3; mothers with higher education engaged in more positive parenting at higher levels of risk than did mothers with less education. There was also an interaction between risk and optimism at age 3; mothers with higher optimism engaged in more positive parenting at lower levels of risk than did mothers with less optimism. The risk index did not predict change in positive parenting from age 3-5, but the protective factor of maternal health predicted positive changes. Conclusions: This study examined factors leading to positive parenting in the face of risk, a topic that has received less attention in the literature on disability. Limitations, future directions, and implications for intervention are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)664-678
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Parenting
Preschool Children
Mothers
Education
Child Behavior
Preschool children
Mother-Child Relations
Child Development
Health Education
Parents
Optimism
Protective Factors
Health

Keywords

  • Developmental delay
  • Parenting
  • Parents
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Resilient parenting of preschool children at developmental risk. / Ellingsen, R.; Baker, B. L.; Blacher, J.; Crnic, Keith.

In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2014, p. 664-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ellingsen, R. ; Baker, B. L. ; Blacher, J. ; Crnic, Keith. / Resilient parenting of preschool children at developmental risk. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2014 ; Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 664-678.
@article{e419a55d512e4c6a892b871731690d28,
title = "Resilient parenting of preschool children at developmental risk",
abstract = "Background: Given the great benefits of effective parenting to child development under normal circumstances, and the even greater benefits in the face of risk, it is important to understand why some parents manage to be effective in their interactions with their child despite facing formidable challenges. This study examined factors that promoted effective parenting in the presence of child developmental delay, high child behaviour problems, and low family income. Method: Data were obtained from 232 families at child age 3 and 5 years. Using an adapted ABCX model, we examined three risk domains (child developmental delay, child behaviour problems, and low family income) and three protective factors (mother's education, health, and optimism). The outcome of interest was positive parenting as coded from mother-child interactions. Results: Levels of positive parenting differed across levels of risk. Education and optimism appeared to be protective factors for positive parenting at ages 3 and 5, and health appeared to be an additional protective factor at age 5. There was an interaction between risk and education at age 3; mothers with higher education engaged in more positive parenting at higher levels of risk than did mothers with less education. There was also an interaction between risk and optimism at age 3; mothers with higher optimism engaged in more positive parenting at lower levels of risk than did mothers with less optimism. The risk index did not predict change in positive parenting from age 3-5, but the protective factor of maternal health predicted positive changes. Conclusions: This study examined factors leading to positive parenting in the face of risk, a topic that has received less attention in the literature on disability. Limitations, future directions, and implications for intervention are discussed.",
keywords = "Developmental delay, Parenting, Parents, Resilience",
author = "R. Ellingsen and Baker, {B. L.} and J. Blacher and Keith Crnic",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/jir.12063",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "664--678",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilient parenting of preschool children at developmental risk

AU - Ellingsen, R.

AU - Baker, B. L.

AU - Blacher, J.

AU - Crnic, Keith

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Given the great benefits of effective parenting to child development under normal circumstances, and the even greater benefits in the face of risk, it is important to understand why some parents manage to be effective in their interactions with their child despite facing formidable challenges. This study examined factors that promoted effective parenting in the presence of child developmental delay, high child behaviour problems, and low family income. Method: Data were obtained from 232 families at child age 3 and 5 years. Using an adapted ABCX model, we examined three risk domains (child developmental delay, child behaviour problems, and low family income) and three protective factors (mother's education, health, and optimism). The outcome of interest was positive parenting as coded from mother-child interactions. Results: Levels of positive parenting differed across levels of risk. Education and optimism appeared to be protective factors for positive parenting at ages 3 and 5, and health appeared to be an additional protective factor at age 5. There was an interaction between risk and education at age 3; mothers with higher education engaged in more positive parenting at higher levels of risk than did mothers with less education. There was also an interaction between risk and optimism at age 3; mothers with higher optimism engaged in more positive parenting at lower levels of risk than did mothers with less optimism. The risk index did not predict change in positive parenting from age 3-5, but the protective factor of maternal health predicted positive changes. Conclusions: This study examined factors leading to positive parenting in the face of risk, a topic that has received less attention in the literature on disability. Limitations, future directions, and implications for intervention are discussed.

AB - Background: Given the great benefits of effective parenting to child development under normal circumstances, and the even greater benefits in the face of risk, it is important to understand why some parents manage to be effective in their interactions with their child despite facing formidable challenges. This study examined factors that promoted effective parenting in the presence of child developmental delay, high child behaviour problems, and low family income. Method: Data were obtained from 232 families at child age 3 and 5 years. Using an adapted ABCX model, we examined three risk domains (child developmental delay, child behaviour problems, and low family income) and three protective factors (mother's education, health, and optimism). The outcome of interest was positive parenting as coded from mother-child interactions. Results: Levels of positive parenting differed across levels of risk. Education and optimism appeared to be protective factors for positive parenting at ages 3 and 5, and health appeared to be an additional protective factor at age 5. There was an interaction between risk and education at age 3; mothers with higher education engaged in more positive parenting at higher levels of risk than did mothers with less education. There was also an interaction between risk and optimism at age 3; mothers with higher optimism engaged in more positive parenting at lower levels of risk than did mothers with less optimism. The risk index did not predict change in positive parenting from age 3-5, but the protective factor of maternal health predicted positive changes. Conclusions: This study examined factors leading to positive parenting in the face of risk, a topic that has received less attention in the literature on disability. Limitations, future directions, and implications for intervention are discussed.

KW - Developmental delay

KW - Parenting

KW - Parents

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902115298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902115298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jir.12063

DO - 10.1111/jir.12063

M3 - Article

C2 - 23834102

AN - SCOPUS:84902115298

VL - 58

SP - 664

EP - 678

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 7

ER -