Resilience: The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation

Alex J. Zautra, John W. Reich

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moving from a disease model of stress and coping to the more integrative model of positive influences represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of how people adapt to and grow in their environment. This new paradigm has raised stress and coping approaches into a framework that models the extent to which personal strengths and other psychosocial resources contribute to the prediction of resilience, independent of the catalog of risks and vulnerabilities identified within the person and his or her social network. We describe this resilience paradigm and review current evidence for its utility in this chapter. In doing so, we point out how the work of Susan Folkman presaged the current attention to models of resilience by calling attention to the importance of coping and positive adaptations to stressful life experience. Three features predominate in scientific discourse on resilience: recovery, sustainability, and growth. These features are inherent to virtually any type of organized entity, from a simple biological system to a person, an organization, a neighborhood, a community, a city, a state, or even a nation. We illustrate further how variables such as "trust," thought to be central to resilience, are best understood as multilevel constructs, with meanings, measures, and potential interventions at the biological, psychosocial, organizational, and community level. In conclusion, we see this paradigm shift to resilience to be a valuable direction for future research, a highly appealing framework for the design of clinical and community interventions, and a refreshing new perspective that offers exciting new directions for public health and public policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780199940707, 9780195375343
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2012

Fingerprint

Life Change Events
Public Policy
Health Policy
Social Support
Public Health
Organizations
Growth
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Adversity
  • Community psychology
  • Coping
  • Growth
  • Job enrichment
  • Multi-level
  • Positive adaptation
  • Positive emotion
  • Positive mental health
  • Positive psychology
  • Recovery
  • Resilience
  • Social capital
  • Stress
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Zautra, A. J., & Reich, J. W. (2012). Resilience: The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation. In The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009

Resilience : The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation. / Zautra, Alex J.; Reich, John W.

The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Zautra, AJ & Reich, JW 2012, Resilience: The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation. in The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009
Zautra AJ, Reich JW. Resilience: The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation. In The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009
Zautra, Alex J. ; Reich, John W. / Resilience : The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation. The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{9d1616b46338434a878540157a0ca9c4,
title = "Resilience: The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation",
abstract = "Moving from a disease model of stress and coping to the more integrative model of positive influences represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of how people adapt to and grow in their environment. This new paradigm has raised stress and coping approaches into a framework that models the extent to which personal strengths and other psychosocial resources contribute to the prediction of resilience, independent of the catalog of risks and vulnerabilities identified within the person and his or her social network. We describe this resilience paradigm and review current evidence for its utility in this chapter. In doing so, we point out how the work of Susan Folkman presaged the current attention to models of resilience by calling attention to the importance of coping and positive adaptations to stressful life experience. Three features predominate in scientific discourse on resilience: recovery, sustainability, and growth. These features are inherent to virtually any type of organized entity, from a simple biological system to a person, an organization, a neighborhood, a community, a city, a state, or even a nation. We illustrate further how variables such as {"}trust,{"} thought to be central to resilience, are best understood as multilevel constructs, with meanings, measures, and potential interventions at the biological, psychosocial, organizational, and community level. In conclusion, we see this paradigm shift to resilience to be a valuable direction for future research, a highly appealing framework for the design of clinical and community interventions, and a refreshing new perspective that offers exciting new directions for public health and public policy.",
keywords = "Adversity, Community psychology, Coping, Growth, Job enrichment, Multi-level, Positive adaptation, Positive emotion, Positive mental health, Positive psychology, Recovery, Resilience, Social capital, Stress, Sustainability",
author = "Zautra, {Alex J.} and Reich, {John W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199940707",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Resilience

T2 - The Meanings, Methods, and Measures of a Fundamental Characteristic of Human Adaptation

AU - Zautra, Alex J.

AU - Reich, John W.

PY - 2012/9/18

Y1 - 2012/9/18

N2 - Moving from a disease model of stress and coping to the more integrative model of positive influences represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of how people adapt to and grow in their environment. This new paradigm has raised stress and coping approaches into a framework that models the extent to which personal strengths and other psychosocial resources contribute to the prediction of resilience, independent of the catalog of risks and vulnerabilities identified within the person and his or her social network. We describe this resilience paradigm and review current evidence for its utility in this chapter. In doing so, we point out how the work of Susan Folkman presaged the current attention to models of resilience by calling attention to the importance of coping and positive adaptations to stressful life experience. Three features predominate in scientific discourse on resilience: recovery, sustainability, and growth. These features are inherent to virtually any type of organized entity, from a simple biological system to a person, an organization, a neighborhood, a community, a city, a state, or even a nation. We illustrate further how variables such as "trust," thought to be central to resilience, are best understood as multilevel constructs, with meanings, measures, and potential interventions at the biological, psychosocial, organizational, and community level. In conclusion, we see this paradigm shift to resilience to be a valuable direction for future research, a highly appealing framework for the design of clinical and community interventions, and a refreshing new perspective that offers exciting new directions for public health and public policy.

AB - Moving from a disease model of stress and coping to the more integrative model of positive influences represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of how people adapt to and grow in their environment. This new paradigm has raised stress and coping approaches into a framework that models the extent to which personal strengths and other psychosocial resources contribute to the prediction of resilience, independent of the catalog of risks and vulnerabilities identified within the person and his or her social network. We describe this resilience paradigm and review current evidence for its utility in this chapter. In doing so, we point out how the work of Susan Folkman presaged the current attention to models of resilience by calling attention to the importance of coping and positive adaptations to stressful life experience. Three features predominate in scientific discourse on resilience: recovery, sustainability, and growth. These features are inherent to virtually any type of organized entity, from a simple biological system to a person, an organization, a neighborhood, a community, a city, a state, or even a nation. We illustrate further how variables such as "trust," thought to be central to resilience, are best understood as multilevel constructs, with meanings, measures, and potential interventions at the biological, psychosocial, organizational, and community level. In conclusion, we see this paradigm shift to resilience to be a valuable direction for future research, a highly appealing framework for the design of clinical and community interventions, and a refreshing new perspective that offers exciting new directions for public health and public policy.

KW - Adversity

KW - Community psychology

KW - Coping

KW - Growth

KW - Job enrichment

KW - Multi-level

KW - Positive adaptation

KW - Positive emotion

KW - Positive mental health

KW - Positive psychology

KW - Recovery

KW - Resilience

KW - Social capital

KW - Stress

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923525083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923525083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0009

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923525083

SN - 9780199940707

SN - 9780195375343

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -