Resilience scientists as change-makers-Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy?

Manjana Milkoreit, Michele Lee Moore, Michael Schoon, Chanda L. Meek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the understanding of the relationship between science and policy making has altered significantly from one that separated the 'truth seeking' domain of science to one characterized by an increasingly close integration of science into the domain of politics, complete with contested values and opinions. Resilience scientists have only recently entered this discussion, but a coherent approach to purposeful institutional change and policy remains elusive, despite core theoretical concepts focusing on the scale and 'fit' of governance institutions for complex social-ecological systems. While the appropriateness of value-driven science is highly contested across all scientific fields, this paper argues that articulating a coherent position is of particular relevance for resilience scientists and others, who use a theoretical framework that is infused with a specific value-set, such as ecosystem and species protection, conservation, inclusiveness and participatory governance processes. Outlining both the challenges of navigating the science-policy interface and a set of approaches resilience scientists could take in response to these challenges, we seek to initiate reflection and debate within the resilience science community concerning their own role in growing the middle ground between science and politics, and conducting science within that hybrid space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-95
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

advocacy
resilience
science
politics
governance
Values
ecological system
science policy
institutional change
social system
policy making
conservation
ecosystem
community

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Normative
  • Resilience
  • Science-policy interface
  • Scientific experts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Resilience scientists as change-makers-Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy? / Milkoreit, Manjana; Moore, Michele Lee; Schoon, Michael; Meek, Chanda L.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 53, 01.11.2015, p. 87-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{634b0eb20e374b0d9dfad66bf1c67059,
title = "Resilience scientists as change-makers-Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy?",
abstract = "Since the beginning of the 20th century, the understanding of the relationship between science and policy making has altered significantly from one that separated the 'truth seeking' domain of science to one characterized by an increasingly close integration of science into the domain of politics, complete with contested values and opinions. Resilience scientists have only recently entered this discussion, but a coherent approach to purposeful institutional change and policy remains elusive, despite core theoretical concepts focusing on the scale and 'fit' of governance institutions for complex social-ecological systems. While the appropriateness of value-driven science is highly contested across all scientific fields, this paper argues that articulating a coherent position is of particular relevance for resilience scientists and others, who use a theoretical framework that is infused with a specific value-set, such as ecosystem and species protection, conservation, inclusiveness and participatory governance processes. Outlining both the challenges of navigating the science-policy interface and a set of approaches resilience scientists could take in response to these challenges, we seek to initiate reflection and debate within the resilience science community concerning their own role in growing the middle ground between science and politics, and conducting science within that hybrid space.",
keywords = "Advocacy, Normative, Resilience, Science-policy interface, Scientific experts",
author = "Manjana Milkoreit and Moore, {Michele Lee} and Michael Schoon and Meek, {Chanda L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "87--95",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience scientists as change-makers-Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy?

AU - Milkoreit, Manjana

AU - Moore, Michele Lee

AU - Schoon, Michael

AU - Meek, Chanda L.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Since the beginning of the 20th century, the understanding of the relationship between science and policy making has altered significantly from one that separated the 'truth seeking' domain of science to one characterized by an increasingly close integration of science into the domain of politics, complete with contested values and opinions. Resilience scientists have only recently entered this discussion, but a coherent approach to purposeful institutional change and policy remains elusive, despite core theoretical concepts focusing on the scale and 'fit' of governance institutions for complex social-ecological systems. While the appropriateness of value-driven science is highly contested across all scientific fields, this paper argues that articulating a coherent position is of particular relevance for resilience scientists and others, who use a theoretical framework that is infused with a specific value-set, such as ecosystem and species protection, conservation, inclusiveness and participatory governance processes. Outlining both the challenges of navigating the science-policy interface and a set of approaches resilience scientists could take in response to these challenges, we seek to initiate reflection and debate within the resilience science community concerning their own role in growing the middle ground between science and politics, and conducting science within that hybrid space.

AB - Since the beginning of the 20th century, the understanding of the relationship between science and policy making has altered significantly from one that separated the 'truth seeking' domain of science to one characterized by an increasingly close integration of science into the domain of politics, complete with contested values and opinions. Resilience scientists have only recently entered this discussion, but a coherent approach to purposeful institutional change and policy remains elusive, despite core theoretical concepts focusing on the scale and 'fit' of governance institutions for complex social-ecological systems. While the appropriateness of value-driven science is highly contested across all scientific fields, this paper argues that articulating a coherent position is of particular relevance for resilience scientists and others, who use a theoretical framework that is infused with a specific value-set, such as ecosystem and species protection, conservation, inclusiveness and participatory governance processes. Outlining both the challenges of navigating the science-policy interface and a set of approaches resilience scientists could take in response to these challenges, we seek to initiate reflection and debate within the resilience science community concerning their own role in growing the middle ground between science and politics, and conducting science within that hybrid space.

KW - Advocacy

KW - Normative

KW - Resilience

KW - Science-policy interface

KW - Scientific experts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027957280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027957280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 87

EP - 95

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -