Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts?

Fiona Miller, Henny Osbahr, Emily Boyd, Frank Thomalla, Sukaina Bharwani, Gina Ziervogel, Brian Walker, Jörn Birkmann, Sander Van Der Leeuw, Johan Rockström, Jochen Hinkel, Tom Downing, Carl Folke, Donald Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

351 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resilience and vulnerability represent two related yet different approaches to understanding the response of systems and actors to change; to shocks and surprises, as well as slow creeping changes. Their respective origins in ecological and social theory largely explain the continuing differences in approach to social-ecological dimensions of change. However, there are many areas of strong convergence. This paper explores the emerging linkages and complementarities between the concepts of resilience and vulnerability to identify areas of synergy. We do this with regard to theory, methodology, and application. The paper seeks to go beyond just recognizing the complementarities between the two approaches to demonstrate how researchers are actively engaging with each field to coproduce new knowledge, and to suggest promising areas of complementarity that are likely to further research and action in the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEcology and Society
Volume15
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

complementarity
vulnerability
social theory
ecological theory
methodology

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Hazards
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Resilience
  • Social-ecological systems
  • Vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., ... Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15(3).

Resilience and vulnerability : Complementary or conflicting concepts? / Miller, Fiona; Osbahr, Henny; Boyd, Emily; Thomalla, Frank; Bharwani, Sukaina; Ziervogel, Gina; Walker, Brian; Birkmann, Jörn; Van Der Leeuw, Sander; Rockström, Johan; Hinkel, Jochen; Downing, Tom; Folke, Carl; Nelson, Donald.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, F, Osbahr, H, Boyd, E, Thomalla, F, Bharwani, S, Ziervogel, G, Walker, B, Birkmann, J, Van Der Leeuw, S, Rockström, J, Hinkel, J, Downing, T, Folke, C & Nelson, D 2010, 'Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts?', Ecology and Society, vol. 15, no. 3.
Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bharwani S, Ziervogel G et al. Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society. 2010;15(3).
Miller, Fiona ; Osbahr, Henny ; Boyd, Emily ; Thomalla, Frank ; Bharwani, Sukaina ; Ziervogel, Gina ; Walker, Brian ; Birkmann, Jörn ; Van Der Leeuw, Sander ; Rockström, Johan ; Hinkel, Jochen ; Downing, Tom ; Folke, Carl ; Nelson, Donald. / Resilience and vulnerability : Complementary or conflicting concepts?. In: Ecology and Society. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. 3.
@article{3c4e3b45a28f4d198d1a78aa0106f187,
title = "Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts?",
abstract = "Resilience and vulnerability represent two related yet different approaches to understanding the response of systems and actors to change; to shocks and surprises, as well as slow creeping changes. Their respective origins in ecological and social theory largely explain the continuing differences in approach to social-ecological dimensions of change. However, there are many areas of strong convergence. This paper explores the emerging linkages and complementarities between the concepts of resilience and vulnerability to identify areas of synergy. We do this with regard to theory, methodology, and application. The paper seeks to go beyond just recognizing the complementarities between the two approaches to demonstrate how researchers are actively engaging with each field to coproduce new knowledge, and to suggest promising areas of complementarity that are likely to further research and action in the field.",
keywords = "Climate change, Hazards, Interdisciplinarity, Resilience, Social-ecological systems, Vulnerability",
author = "Fiona Miller and Henny Osbahr and Emily Boyd and Frank Thomalla and Sukaina Bharwani and Gina Ziervogel and Brian Walker and J{\"o}rn Birkmann and {Van Der Leeuw}, Sander and Johan Rockstr{\"o}m and Jochen Hinkel and Tom Downing and Carl Folke and Donald Nelson",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience and vulnerability

T2 - Complementary or conflicting concepts?

AU - Miller, Fiona

AU - Osbahr, Henny

AU - Boyd, Emily

AU - Thomalla, Frank

AU - Bharwani, Sukaina

AU - Ziervogel, Gina

AU - Walker, Brian

AU - Birkmann, Jörn

AU - Van Der Leeuw, Sander

AU - Rockström, Johan

AU - Hinkel, Jochen

AU - Downing, Tom

AU - Folke, Carl

AU - Nelson, Donald

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Resilience and vulnerability represent two related yet different approaches to understanding the response of systems and actors to change; to shocks and surprises, as well as slow creeping changes. Their respective origins in ecological and social theory largely explain the continuing differences in approach to social-ecological dimensions of change. However, there are many areas of strong convergence. This paper explores the emerging linkages and complementarities between the concepts of resilience and vulnerability to identify areas of synergy. We do this with regard to theory, methodology, and application. The paper seeks to go beyond just recognizing the complementarities between the two approaches to demonstrate how researchers are actively engaging with each field to coproduce new knowledge, and to suggest promising areas of complementarity that are likely to further research and action in the field.

AB - Resilience and vulnerability represent two related yet different approaches to understanding the response of systems and actors to change; to shocks and surprises, as well as slow creeping changes. Their respective origins in ecological and social theory largely explain the continuing differences in approach to social-ecological dimensions of change. However, there are many areas of strong convergence. This paper explores the emerging linkages and complementarities between the concepts of resilience and vulnerability to identify areas of synergy. We do this with regard to theory, methodology, and application. The paper seeks to go beyond just recognizing the complementarities between the two approaches to demonstrate how researchers are actively engaging with each field to coproduce new knowledge, and to suggest promising areas of complementarity that are likely to further research and action in the field.

KW - Climate change

KW - Hazards

KW - Interdisciplinarity

KW - Resilience

KW - Social-ecological systems

KW - Vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958508483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958508483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77958508483

VL - 15

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 3

ER -