Abstract

This special issue results from a call for papers to address the connection between resilience and sustainability, and stems from the fact that the ecological concept of resilience has been exercising an increasing influence on the economics of development. Resilience is interpreted in two different ways by ecologists: one capturing the speed of return to equilibrium following perturbation (Pimm, 1984), the other capturing the size of a disturbance needed to dislodge a system from its stability domain (Holling, 1973). The latter may be interpreted as the conditional probability that a system in one stability domain will flip into another stability domain given its current state and the disturbance regime (Perrings, 1998). The relevance of this concept for the problem of sustainable economic development has been recognized for at least fifteen years (Common and Perrings, 1992). Indeed, Levin et al. (1998) claimed that resilience is the preferred way to think about sustainability in social as well as natural systems, and a research network - the Resilience Alliance - has subsequently developed around the idea.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-427
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironment and Development Economics
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

economic development
sustainable development
sustainability
social sustainability
disturbance
ecologists
perturbation
stems
economics
speed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Resilience and sustainable development. / Perrings, Charles.

In: Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 11, No. 4, 08.2006, p. 417-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68044a8b398748ad9af7ee0d3fb76952,
title = "Resilience and sustainable development",
abstract = "This special issue results from a call for papers to address the connection between resilience and sustainability, and stems from the fact that the ecological concept of resilience has been exercising an increasing influence on the economics of development. Resilience is interpreted in two different ways by ecologists: one capturing the speed of return to equilibrium following perturbation (Pimm, 1984), the other capturing the size of a disturbance needed to dislodge a system from its stability domain (Holling, 1973). The latter may be interpreted as the conditional probability that a system in one stability domain will flip into another stability domain given its current state and the disturbance regime (Perrings, 1998). The relevance of this concept for the problem of sustainable economic development has been recognized for at least fifteen years (Common and Perrings, 1992). Indeed, Levin et al. (1998) claimed that resilience is the preferred way to think about sustainability in social as well as natural systems, and a research network - the Resilience Alliance - has subsequently developed around the idea.",
author = "Charles Perrings",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S1355770X06003020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "417--427",
journal = "Environment and Development Economics",
issn = "1355-770X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience and sustainable development

AU - Perrings, Charles

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - This special issue results from a call for papers to address the connection between resilience and sustainability, and stems from the fact that the ecological concept of resilience has been exercising an increasing influence on the economics of development. Resilience is interpreted in two different ways by ecologists: one capturing the speed of return to equilibrium following perturbation (Pimm, 1984), the other capturing the size of a disturbance needed to dislodge a system from its stability domain (Holling, 1973). The latter may be interpreted as the conditional probability that a system in one stability domain will flip into another stability domain given its current state and the disturbance regime (Perrings, 1998). The relevance of this concept for the problem of sustainable economic development has been recognized for at least fifteen years (Common and Perrings, 1992). Indeed, Levin et al. (1998) claimed that resilience is the preferred way to think about sustainability in social as well as natural systems, and a research network - the Resilience Alliance - has subsequently developed around the idea.

AB - This special issue results from a call for papers to address the connection between resilience and sustainability, and stems from the fact that the ecological concept of resilience has been exercising an increasing influence on the economics of development. Resilience is interpreted in two different ways by ecologists: one capturing the speed of return to equilibrium following perturbation (Pimm, 1984), the other capturing the size of a disturbance needed to dislodge a system from its stability domain (Holling, 1973). The latter may be interpreted as the conditional probability that a system in one stability domain will flip into another stability domain given its current state and the disturbance regime (Perrings, 1998). The relevance of this concept for the problem of sustainable economic development has been recognized for at least fifteen years (Common and Perrings, 1992). Indeed, Levin et al. (1998) claimed that resilience is the preferred way to think about sustainability in social as well as natural systems, and a research network - the Resilience Alliance - has subsequently developed around the idea.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746036053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746036053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355770X06003020

DO - 10.1017/S1355770X06003020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746036053

VL - 11

SP - 417

EP - 427

JO - Environment and Development Economics

JF - Environment and Development Economics

SN - 1355-770X

IS - 4

ER -