Residential cooling using separated and coupled precooling and thermal energy storage strategies

James Nelson, Nathan Johnson, Prudhvi Tej Chinimilli, Wenlong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Increased residential cooling loads often correlate with peak electricity demand in warm and temperate climates. Solutions such as precooling and thermal energy storage (TES) being separately shown to shift energy use to off-peak times and reduce electricity expenses for commercial and residential applications. This study advances prior research to jointly implement and optimize precooling and TES strategies, and further develops a precooling strategy that dynamically adjusts precooling set points with respect to outdoor temperatures. Six strategies for residential cooling are evaluated and compared on metrics including system sizing, intraday dispatch, electricity use, energy expenditures, and investment rate of return. Case study data include a simulated one-year period for the cities of Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Kona in the United States. After accounting for capital cost, operating cost savings, and discount factors, a smart thermostat with the proposed dynamic precooling technique is found to have the best return on investment with payback rates between 0.2 and 6.2 years across all locations and rate structures. However, if technology costs lower or electricity rates change, it could be beneficial to use a combined approach with TES and precooling that gives the greatest reduction in daily on-peak demand and energy use at 75.6% and 78.5%, respectively. These individual and combined strategies provide value to ratepayers and electric utilities by reducing energy expenditures and shifting cooling loads to reduce system-wide peak demand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number113414
JournalApplied Energy
Volume252
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2019

Fingerprint

Thermal energy
Energy storage
electricity
Electricity
energy use
Cooling
cooling
expenditure
cost
Metric system
Thermostats
Electric utilities
Operating costs
Costs
savings
rate
energy storage
energy
demand
temperature

Keywords

  • Building energy
  • Electricity rates
  • Load shift
  • Precooling
  • Techno-economic analysis
  • Thermal energy storage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Energy(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Residential cooling using separated and coupled precooling and thermal energy storage strategies. / Nelson, James; Johnson, Nathan; Chinimilli, Prudhvi Tej; Zhang, Wenlong.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 252, 113414, 15.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02788ca055d7448f8b2b7ff1890b15db,
title = "Residential cooling using separated and coupled precooling and thermal energy storage strategies",
abstract = "Increased residential cooling loads often correlate with peak electricity demand in warm and temperate climates. Solutions such as precooling and thermal energy storage (TES) being separately shown to shift energy use to off-peak times and reduce electricity expenses for commercial and residential applications. This study advances prior research to jointly implement and optimize precooling and TES strategies, and further develops a precooling strategy that dynamically adjusts precooling set points with respect to outdoor temperatures. Six strategies for residential cooling are evaluated and compared on metrics including system sizing, intraday dispatch, electricity use, energy expenditures, and investment rate of return. Case study data include a simulated one-year period for the cities of Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Kona in the United States. After accounting for capital cost, operating cost savings, and discount factors, a smart thermostat with the proposed dynamic precooling technique is found to have the best return on investment with payback rates between 0.2 and 6.2 years across all locations and rate structures. However, if technology costs lower or electricity rates change, it could be beneficial to use a combined approach with TES and precooling that gives the greatest reduction in daily on-peak demand and energy use at 75.6{\%} and 78.5{\%}, respectively. These individual and combined strategies provide value to ratepayers and electric utilities by reducing energy expenditures and shifting cooling loads to reduce system-wide peak demand.",
keywords = "Building energy, Electricity rates, Load shift, Precooling, Techno-economic analysis, Thermal energy storage",
author = "James Nelson and Nathan Johnson and Chinimilli, {Prudhvi Tej} and Wenlong Zhang",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "252",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residential cooling using separated and coupled precooling and thermal energy storage strategies

AU - Nelson, James

AU - Johnson, Nathan

AU - Chinimilli, Prudhvi Tej

AU - Zhang, Wenlong

PY - 2019/10/15

Y1 - 2019/10/15

N2 - Increased residential cooling loads often correlate with peak electricity demand in warm and temperate climates. Solutions such as precooling and thermal energy storage (TES) being separately shown to shift energy use to off-peak times and reduce electricity expenses for commercial and residential applications. This study advances prior research to jointly implement and optimize precooling and TES strategies, and further develops a precooling strategy that dynamically adjusts precooling set points with respect to outdoor temperatures. Six strategies for residential cooling are evaluated and compared on metrics including system sizing, intraday dispatch, electricity use, energy expenditures, and investment rate of return. Case study data include a simulated one-year period for the cities of Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Kona in the United States. After accounting for capital cost, operating cost savings, and discount factors, a smart thermostat with the proposed dynamic precooling technique is found to have the best return on investment with payback rates between 0.2 and 6.2 years across all locations and rate structures. However, if technology costs lower or electricity rates change, it could be beneficial to use a combined approach with TES and precooling that gives the greatest reduction in daily on-peak demand and energy use at 75.6% and 78.5%, respectively. These individual and combined strategies provide value to ratepayers and electric utilities by reducing energy expenditures and shifting cooling loads to reduce system-wide peak demand.

AB - Increased residential cooling loads often correlate with peak electricity demand in warm and temperate climates. Solutions such as precooling and thermal energy storage (TES) being separately shown to shift energy use to off-peak times and reduce electricity expenses for commercial and residential applications. This study advances prior research to jointly implement and optimize precooling and TES strategies, and further develops a precooling strategy that dynamically adjusts precooling set points with respect to outdoor temperatures. Six strategies for residential cooling are evaluated and compared on metrics including system sizing, intraday dispatch, electricity use, energy expenditures, and investment rate of return. Case study data include a simulated one-year period for the cities of Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Kona in the United States. After accounting for capital cost, operating cost savings, and discount factors, a smart thermostat with the proposed dynamic precooling technique is found to have the best return on investment with payback rates between 0.2 and 6.2 years across all locations and rate structures. However, if technology costs lower or electricity rates change, it could be beneficial to use a combined approach with TES and precooling that gives the greatest reduction in daily on-peak demand and energy use at 75.6% and 78.5%, respectively. These individual and combined strategies provide value to ratepayers and electric utilities by reducing energy expenditures and shifting cooling loads to reduce system-wide peak demand.

KW - Building energy

KW - Electricity rates

KW - Load shift

KW - Precooling

KW - Techno-economic analysis

KW - Thermal energy storage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067231838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067231838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113414

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113414

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067231838

VL - 252

JO - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

M1 - 113414

ER -