Researching the researcher-as-instrument

An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity

Anne E. Pezalla, Jonathan Pettigrew, Michelle Miller-Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the researcher is the instrument in semistructured or unstructured qualitative interviews, unique researcher characteristics have the potential to influence the collection of empirical materials. This concept, although widely acknowledged, has garnered little systematic investigation. This article discusses the interviewer characteristics of three different interviewers who are part of a qualitative research team. The researcher/interviewers - and authors of this article - reflect on their own and each other's interviews and explore the ways in which individual interview practices create unique conversational spaces. The results suggest that certain interviewer characteristics may be more effective than others in eliciting detailed narratives from respondents depending on the perceived sensitivity of the topic, but that variation in interviewer characteristics may benefit rather than detract from the goals of team-based qualitative inquiry. The authors call for the inclusion of enhanced self-reflexivity in interviewer training and development activities and argue against standardization of interviewer practices in qualitative research teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-185
Number of pages21
JournalQualitative Research
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reflexivity
interview
qualitative research
Self-reflexivity
Exercise
qualitative interview
inclusion
Qualitative Research
Research Teams
narrative

Keywords

  • interviewing
  • qualitative research
  • researcher as instrument
  • researcher reflexivity
  • team-based research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Researching the researcher-as-instrument : An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. / Pezalla, Anne E.; Pettigrew, Jonathan; Miller-Day, Michelle.

In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 165-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pezalla, Anne E. ; Pettigrew, Jonathan ; Miller-Day, Michelle. / Researching the researcher-as-instrument : An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. In: Qualitative Research. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 165-185.
@article{639485a4791b471daf0fce452279f48b,
title = "Researching the researcher-as-instrument: An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity",
abstract = "Because the researcher is the instrument in semistructured or unstructured qualitative interviews, unique researcher characteristics have the potential to influence the collection of empirical materials. This concept, although widely acknowledged, has garnered little systematic investigation. This article discusses the interviewer characteristics of three different interviewers who are part of a qualitative research team. The researcher/interviewers - and authors of this article - reflect on their own and each other's interviews and explore the ways in which individual interview practices create unique conversational spaces. The results suggest that certain interviewer characteristics may be more effective than others in eliciting detailed narratives from respondents depending on the perceived sensitivity of the topic, but that variation in interviewer characteristics may benefit rather than detract from the goals of team-based qualitative inquiry. The authors call for the inclusion of enhanced self-reflexivity in interviewer training and development activities and argue against standardization of interviewer practices in qualitative research teams.",
keywords = "interviewing, qualitative research, researcher as instrument, researcher reflexivity, team-based research",
author = "Pezalla, {Anne E.} and Jonathan Pettigrew and Michelle Miller-Day",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1468794111422107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "165--185",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researching the researcher-as-instrument

T2 - An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity

AU - Pezalla, Anne E.

AU - Pettigrew, Jonathan

AU - Miller-Day, Michelle

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Because the researcher is the instrument in semistructured or unstructured qualitative interviews, unique researcher characteristics have the potential to influence the collection of empirical materials. This concept, although widely acknowledged, has garnered little systematic investigation. This article discusses the interviewer characteristics of three different interviewers who are part of a qualitative research team. The researcher/interviewers - and authors of this article - reflect on their own and each other's interviews and explore the ways in which individual interview practices create unique conversational spaces. The results suggest that certain interviewer characteristics may be more effective than others in eliciting detailed narratives from respondents depending on the perceived sensitivity of the topic, but that variation in interviewer characteristics may benefit rather than detract from the goals of team-based qualitative inquiry. The authors call for the inclusion of enhanced self-reflexivity in interviewer training and development activities and argue against standardization of interviewer practices in qualitative research teams.

AB - Because the researcher is the instrument in semistructured or unstructured qualitative interviews, unique researcher characteristics have the potential to influence the collection of empirical materials. This concept, although widely acknowledged, has garnered little systematic investigation. This article discusses the interviewer characteristics of three different interviewers who are part of a qualitative research team. The researcher/interviewers - and authors of this article - reflect on their own and each other's interviews and explore the ways in which individual interview practices create unique conversational spaces. The results suggest that certain interviewer characteristics may be more effective than others in eliciting detailed narratives from respondents depending on the perceived sensitivity of the topic, but that variation in interviewer characteristics may benefit rather than detract from the goals of team-based qualitative inquiry. The authors call for the inclusion of enhanced self-reflexivity in interviewer training and development activities and argue against standardization of interviewer practices in qualitative research teams.

KW - interviewing

KW - qualitative research

KW - researcher as instrument

KW - researcher reflexivity

KW - team-based research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859296561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859296561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468794111422107

DO - 10.1177/1468794111422107

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 165

EP - 185

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 2

ER -