Researcher "Projection" revisited: A response to Kahn

Jeffrey L. Godwin, Christopher Neck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a recent issue of this journal (The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science), Neck, Godwin, and Spencer (1996) analyzed a case study in an effort to highlight the problems of researcher projection from a conscious (attributive) projection perspective. Along with that article, Kahn (1996) provided a reviewer's comment in which he approached the issue from an unconscious (classic psychoanalytic) projection perspective. Due to the lack of a clear development and comparison of these two underlying projection frameworks, the relative contribution of each perspective remains unclear Consequently, the purpose of this article is to attempt to bring further clarity to the issue of researcher projection in interpreting data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-331
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Behavioral Science
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Behavioral Sciences
Neck
Unconscious (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Researcher "Projection" revisited : A response to Kahn. / Godwin, Jeffrey L.; Neck, Christopher.

In: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1996, p. 323-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e6866ad084c4c5f9f024161991a326b,
title = "Researcher {"}Projection{"} revisited: A response to Kahn",
abstract = "In a recent issue of this journal (The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science), Neck, Godwin, and Spencer (1996) analyzed a case study in an effort to highlight the problems of researcher projection from a conscious (attributive) projection perspective. Along with that article, Kahn (1996) provided a reviewer's comment in which he approached the issue from an unconscious (classic psychoanalytic) projection perspective. Due to the lack of a clear development and comparison of these two underlying projection frameworks, the relative contribution of each perspective remains unclear Consequently, the purpose of this article is to attempt to bring further clarity to the issue of researcher projection in interpreting data.",
author = "Godwin, {Jeffrey L.} and Christopher Neck",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1177/0021886396323006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "323--331",
journal = "The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science",
issn = "0021-8863",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researcher "Projection" revisited

T2 - A response to Kahn

AU - Godwin, Jeffrey L.

AU - Neck, Christopher

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - In a recent issue of this journal (The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science), Neck, Godwin, and Spencer (1996) analyzed a case study in an effort to highlight the problems of researcher projection from a conscious (attributive) projection perspective. Along with that article, Kahn (1996) provided a reviewer's comment in which he approached the issue from an unconscious (classic psychoanalytic) projection perspective. Due to the lack of a clear development and comparison of these two underlying projection frameworks, the relative contribution of each perspective remains unclear Consequently, the purpose of this article is to attempt to bring further clarity to the issue of researcher projection in interpreting data.

AB - In a recent issue of this journal (The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science), Neck, Godwin, and Spencer (1996) analyzed a case study in an effort to highlight the problems of researcher projection from a conscious (attributive) projection perspective. Along with that article, Kahn (1996) provided a reviewer's comment in which he approached the issue from an unconscious (classic psychoanalytic) projection perspective. Due to the lack of a clear development and comparison of these two underlying projection frameworks, the relative contribution of each perspective remains unclear Consequently, the purpose of this article is to attempt to bring further clarity to the issue of researcher projection in interpreting data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248130650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248130650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0021886396323006

DO - 10.1177/0021886396323006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248130650

VL - 32

SP - 323

EP - 331

JO - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

JF - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

SN - 0021-8863

IS - 3

ER -