Research on resilience: Response to commentaries

Suniya S. Luthar; Dante Cicchetti; Bronwyn Becker

doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00168

Research on resilience: Response to commentaries

Suniya S. Luthar, Dante Cicchetti, Bronwyn Becker

Arizona State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

156 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	573-575
Number of pages	3
Journal	Child development
Volume	71
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00168
State	Published - Jan 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Education
Developmental and Educational Psychology

Access to Document

10.1111/1467-8624.00168

Cite this

@article{728df0ada6694c04a551c64ee626ccc1,

title = "Research on resilience: Response to commentaries",

abstract = "Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.",

author = "Luthar, {Suniya S.} and Dante Cicchetti and Bronwyn Becker",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1467-8624.00168",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "71",

pages = "573--575",

journal = "Child development",

issn = "0009-3920",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research on resilience

T2 - Response to commentaries

AU - Luthar, Suniya S.

AU - Cicchetti, Dante

AU - Becker, Bronwyn

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.

AB - Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034376184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034376184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8624.00168

DO - 10.1111/1467-8624.00168

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034376184

SN - 0009-3920

VL - 71

SP - 573

EP - 575

JO - Child development

JF - Child development

IS - 3

ER -

Research on resilience: Response to commentaries

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this