TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproductive Coercion by an Intimate Partner
T2 - Occurrence, Associations, and Interference with Sexual Health Decision Making
AU - Thaller, Jonel
AU - Messing, Jill
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 National Association of Social Workers.
PY - 2014/2/24
Y1 - 2014/2/24
N2 - Reproductive coercion is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) in which a variety of tactics can be used to force pregnancy on an intimate partner. This study investigated the occurrence of male-perpetrated reproductive coercion, its relationship to other forms of IPV, and interference with women's sexual health decision making. Two data sets were collected, by conducting client-practitioner screenings (n = 2,108) and anonymous surveys (n = 84), from women seeking reproductive health services in a southwestern state and analyzed separately. Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion varied according to data-collection method, indicating that behaviorally based screening tools and anonymous screening may increase disclosure rates. In the screening sample, reproductive coercion was associated with forced sex, threats of physical harm, and verbal abuse. In the survey sample, reproductive coercion was associated with being nonwhite, fear of asking one's partner to use a condom, and fear of refusing sex. Social workers should be aware that reproductive coercion is a form of coercive control that may be associated with increased fear and IPV and may interfere with sexual health decision making; however, disclosure of reproductive coercion or IPV is not necessary for intervention. The article concludes with a discussion of screening and intervention strategies.
AB - Reproductive coercion is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) in which a variety of tactics can be used to force pregnancy on an intimate partner. This study investigated the occurrence of male-perpetrated reproductive coercion, its relationship to other forms of IPV, and interference with women's sexual health decision making. Two data sets were collected, by conducting client-practitioner screenings (n = 2,108) and anonymous surveys (n = 84), from women seeking reproductive health services in a southwestern state and analyzed separately. Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion varied according to data-collection method, indicating that behaviorally based screening tools and anonymous screening may increase disclosure rates. In the screening sample, reproductive coercion was associated with forced sex, threats of physical harm, and verbal abuse. In the survey sample, reproductive coercion was associated with being nonwhite, fear of asking one's partner to use a condom, and fear of refusing sex. Social workers should be aware that reproductive coercion is a form of coercive control that may be associated with increased fear and IPV and may interfere with sexual health decision making; however, disclosure of reproductive coercion or IPV is not necessary for intervention. The article concludes with a discussion of screening and intervention strategies.
KW - domestic violence
KW - family planning
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - reproductive health
KW - screenings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962226717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962226717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/hsw/hlv083
DO - 10.1093/hsw/hlv083
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84962226717
SN - 0360-7283
VL - 41
SP - e11-e19
JO - Health and Social Work
JF - Health and Social Work
IS - 1
ER -