Representation in engineering design

A framework for classification

Joshua D. Summers, Jami J. Shah

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many researchers have identified engineering design representation as a central issue for design research and design automation development. Despite this identification, there is still no common agreement on a framework for classifying and describing representation in engineering design. A framework for classifying representations in engineering design is presented here that is based upon the vocabulary, structure, expression, purpose, and abstraction. Examples are used to illustrate the application of this framework. Finally, this framework is compared to other partial representation classifications found in the literature. The framework discussed here enables design researchers, design practitioners, and design students to compare design representation approaches thereby supporting the selection of appropriate representations and models for various design tasks and automation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Pages439-448
Number of pages10
Volume3
StatePublished - 2004
Event2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Duration: Sep 28 2004Oct 2 2004

Other

Other2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
CountryUnited States
CitySalt Lake City, UT
Period9/28/0410/2/04

Fingerprint

Automation
Identification (control systems)
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Summers, J. D., & Shah, J. J. (2004). Representation in engineering design: A framework for classification. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 439-448). [57514]

Representation in engineering design : A framework for classification. / Summers, Joshua D.; Shah, Jami J.

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3 2004. p. 439-448 57514.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Summers, JD & Shah, JJ 2004, Representation in engineering design: A framework for classification. in Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. vol. 3, 57514, pp. 439-448, 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 9/28/04.
Summers JD, Shah JJ. Representation in engineering design: A framework for classification. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3. 2004. p. 439-448. 57514
Summers, Joshua D. ; Shah, Jami J. / Representation in engineering design : A framework for classification. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Vol. 3 2004. pp. 439-448
@inproceedings{d3aa9bd5051a4e629901517e7d8bdf32,
title = "Representation in engineering design: A framework for classification",
abstract = "Many researchers have identified engineering design representation as a central issue for design research and design automation development. Despite this identification, there is still no common agreement on a framework for classifying and describing representation in engineering design. A framework for classifying representations in engineering design is presented here that is based upon the vocabulary, structure, expression, purpose, and abstraction. Examples are used to illustrate the application of this framework. Finally, this framework is compared to other partial representation classifications found in the literature. The framework discussed here enables design researchers, design practitioners, and design students to compare design representation approaches thereby supporting the selection of appropriate representations and models for various design tasks and automation.",
author = "Summers, {Joshua D.} and Shah, {Jami J.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "439--448",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Representation in engineering design

T2 - A framework for classification

AU - Summers, Joshua D.

AU - Shah, Jami J.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Many researchers have identified engineering design representation as a central issue for design research and design automation development. Despite this identification, there is still no common agreement on a framework for classifying and describing representation in engineering design. A framework for classifying representations in engineering design is presented here that is based upon the vocabulary, structure, expression, purpose, and abstraction. Examples are used to illustrate the application of this framework. Finally, this framework is compared to other partial representation classifications found in the literature. The framework discussed here enables design researchers, design practitioners, and design students to compare design representation approaches thereby supporting the selection of appropriate representations and models for various design tasks and automation.

AB - Many researchers have identified engineering design representation as a central issue for design research and design automation development. Despite this identification, there is still no common agreement on a framework for classifying and describing representation in engineering design. A framework for classifying representations in engineering design is presented here that is based upon the vocabulary, structure, expression, purpose, and abstraction. Examples are used to illustrate the application of this framework. Finally, this framework is compared to other partial representation classifications found in the literature. The framework discussed here enables design researchers, design practitioners, and design students to compare design representation approaches thereby supporting the selection of appropriate representations and models for various design tasks and automation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14044257969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14044257969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 3

SP - 439

EP - 448

BT - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

ER -