Report on Committee I

Paul Bender, Martha A. Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It was suggested that a way of clarifying con stitutional values might be to look closer at the framers of the Constitution—what were their views and background. They were elitists, from diverse backgrounds, representing a rela tively broad spectrum for the time. Particular revolutionary values were discussed, beginning with equality. Discussion particularly centered on whether equality referred to “equal ity of opportunity” or “equality of result.” It was expressed that equality of result was not in conflict with equality of opportunity but a necessary tool to achieve it. Generally, equality of opportunity was preferred to equality of result, except that there should be a certain amount of result equality in order to ensure real equality of opportunity, and it was agreed that quotas were sometimes necessary to correct past discrimination. Other values were discussed briefly, including domestic tranquility, exporting democracy, free speech, constitutional respect for individual autonomy and privacy, and fairness of treatment by government. Revolu tionary values were summarized as falling into 3 categories: freedom of expression, equality, and protection from govern ment arbitrariness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-80
Number of pages11
JournalThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume426
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1976
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

equality
Values
fairness
privacy
respect
discrimination
autonomy
democracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Report on Committee I. / Bender, Paul; Field, Martha A.

In: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 426, No. 1, 01.01.1976, p. 70-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{805515a8eeed4990a23ca203d862eb30,
title = "Report on Committee I",
abstract = "It was suggested that a way of clarifying con stitutional values might be to look closer at the framers of the Constitution—what were their views and background. They were elitists, from diverse backgrounds, representing a rela tively broad spectrum for the time. Particular revolutionary values were discussed, beginning with equality. Discussion particularly centered on whether equality referred to “equal ity of opportunity” or “equality of result.” It was expressed that equality of result was not in conflict with equality of opportunity but a necessary tool to achieve it. Generally, equality of opportunity was preferred to equality of result, except that there should be a certain amount of result equality in order to ensure real equality of opportunity, and it was agreed that quotas were sometimes necessary to correct past discrimination. Other values were discussed briefly, including domestic tranquility, exporting democracy, free speech, constitutional respect for individual autonomy and privacy, and fairness of treatment by government. Revolu tionary values were summarized as falling into 3 categories: freedom of expression, equality, and protection from govern ment arbitrariness.",
author = "Paul Bender and Field, {Martha A.}",
year = "1976",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/000271627642600108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "426",
pages = "70--80",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Report on Committee I

AU - Bender, Paul

AU - Field, Martha A.

PY - 1976/1/1

Y1 - 1976/1/1

N2 - It was suggested that a way of clarifying con stitutional values might be to look closer at the framers of the Constitution—what were their views and background. They were elitists, from diverse backgrounds, representing a rela tively broad spectrum for the time. Particular revolutionary values were discussed, beginning with equality. Discussion particularly centered on whether equality referred to “equal ity of opportunity” or “equality of result.” It was expressed that equality of result was not in conflict with equality of opportunity but a necessary tool to achieve it. Generally, equality of opportunity was preferred to equality of result, except that there should be a certain amount of result equality in order to ensure real equality of opportunity, and it was agreed that quotas were sometimes necessary to correct past discrimination. Other values were discussed briefly, including domestic tranquility, exporting democracy, free speech, constitutional respect for individual autonomy and privacy, and fairness of treatment by government. Revolu tionary values were summarized as falling into 3 categories: freedom of expression, equality, and protection from govern ment arbitrariness.

AB - It was suggested that a way of clarifying con stitutional values might be to look closer at the framers of the Constitution—what were their views and background. They were elitists, from diverse backgrounds, representing a rela tively broad spectrum for the time. Particular revolutionary values were discussed, beginning with equality. Discussion particularly centered on whether equality referred to “equal ity of opportunity” or “equality of result.” It was expressed that equality of result was not in conflict with equality of opportunity but a necessary tool to achieve it. Generally, equality of opportunity was preferred to equality of result, except that there should be a certain amount of result equality in order to ensure real equality of opportunity, and it was agreed that quotas were sometimes necessary to correct past discrimination. Other values were discussed briefly, including domestic tranquility, exporting democracy, free speech, constitutional respect for individual autonomy and privacy, and fairness of treatment by government. Revolu tionary values were summarized as falling into 3 categories: freedom of expression, equality, and protection from govern ment arbitrariness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965909726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965909726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000271627642600108

DO - 10.1177/000271627642600108

M3 - Article

VL - 426

SP - 70

EP - 80

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

SN - 0002-7162

IS - 1

ER -