Reply to van Hoorn: Converging lines of evidence

Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Richard McElreath, Michael Gurven, Peter J. Richerson, Jean Ensminger, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, H. Clark Barrett, Alexander Bolyanatz, Colin F. Camerer, Juan Camilo Cardenas, Ernst Fehr, Herbert M. Gintis, Francisco Gil-White, Edwins Laban Gwako, Natalie Henrich, Kim Hill, Carolyn Lesorogol, John Q. PattonFrank W. Marlowe, David P. Tracer, John Ziker

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

3 Scopus citations
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E1678
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume109
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 26 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., McElreath, R., Gurven, M., Richerson, P. J., Ensminger, J., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Camerer, C. F., Cardenas, J. C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., Gil-White, F., Gwako, E. L., Henrich, N., Hill, K., Lesorogol, C., ... Ziker, J. (2012). Reply to van Hoorn: Converging lines of evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(26), E1678. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204165109