Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, Gary Edmond, Tim Grant, R. Brent Ostrum, Paul Roberts, Michael Saks, Denise Syndercombe Court, William C. Thompson, Sandy Zabell

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100149
JournalForensic Science International: Synergy
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Forensic science
  • Method validation
  • Quality management
  • Standard
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this