Replication in Prevention Science

Jeffrey C. Valentine, Anthony Biglan, Robert F. Boruch, Felipe Castro, Linda M. Collins, Brian R. Flay, Sheppard Kellam, Eve K. Mościcki, Steven P. Schinke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Replication research is essential for the advancement of any scientific field. In this paper, we argue that prevention science will be better positioned to help improve public health if (a) more replications are conducted; (b) those replications are systematic, thoughtful, and conducted with full knowledge of the trials that have preceded them; and (c) state-of-the art techniques are used to summarize the body of evidence on the effects of the interventions. Under real-world demands it is often not feasible to wait for multiple replications to accumulate before making decisions about intervention adoption. To help individuals and agencies make better decisions about intervention utility, we outline strategies that can be used to help understand the likely direction, size, and range of intervention effects as suggested by the current knowledge base. We also suggest structural changes that could increase the amount and quality of replication research, such as the provision of incentives and a more vigorous pursuit of prospective research registers. Finally, we discuss methods for integrating replications into the roll-out of a program and suggest that strong partnerships with local decision makers are a key component of success in replication research. Our hope is that this paper can highlight the importance of replication and stimulate more discussion of the important elements of the replication process. We are confident that, armed with more and better replications and state-of-the-art review methods, prevention science will be in a better position to positively impact public health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-117
Number of pages15
JournalPrevention Science
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Research
Hope
Public Health
Knowledge Bases
Motivation
Decision Making
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Effectiveness
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Replication
  • Reproducibility
  • Systematic Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Valentine, J. C., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F., Collins, L. M., Flay, B. R., ... Schinke, S. P. (2011). Replication in Prevention Science. Prevention Science, 12(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6

Replication in Prevention Science. / Valentine, Jeffrey C.; Biglan, Anthony; Boruch, Robert F.; Castro, Felipe; Collins, Linda M.; Flay, Brian R.; Kellam, Sheppard; Mościcki, Eve K.; Schinke, Steven P.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 12, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 103-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valentine, JC, Biglan, A, Boruch, RF, Castro, F, Collins, LM, Flay, BR, Kellam, S, Mościcki, EK & Schinke, SP 2011, 'Replication in Prevention Science', Prevention Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6
Valentine JC, Biglan A, Boruch RF, Castro F, Collins LM, Flay BR et al. Replication in Prevention Science. Prevention Science. 2011 Jun;12(2):103-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6
Valentine, Jeffrey C. ; Biglan, Anthony ; Boruch, Robert F. ; Castro, Felipe ; Collins, Linda M. ; Flay, Brian R. ; Kellam, Sheppard ; Mościcki, Eve K. ; Schinke, Steven P. / Replication in Prevention Science. In: Prevention Science. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 103-117.
@article{d4ef964b29194660819825dacb057281,
title = "Replication in Prevention Science",
abstract = "Replication research is essential for the advancement of any scientific field. In this paper, we argue that prevention science will be better positioned to help improve public health if (a) more replications are conducted; (b) those replications are systematic, thoughtful, and conducted with full knowledge of the trials that have preceded them; and (c) state-of-the art techniques are used to summarize the body of evidence on the effects of the interventions. Under real-world demands it is often not feasible to wait for multiple replications to accumulate before making decisions about intervention adoption. To help individuals and agencies make better decisions about intervention utility, we outline strategies that can be used to help understand the likely direction, size, and range of intervention effects as suggested by the current knowledge base. We also suggest structural changes that could increase the amount and quality of replication research, such as the provision of incentives and a more vigorous pursuit of prospective research registers. Finally, we discuss methods for integrating replications into the roll-out of a program and suggest that strong partnerships with local decision makers are a key component of success in replication research. Our hope is that this paper can highlight the importance of replication and stimulate more discussion of the important elements of the replication process. We are confident that, armed with more and better replications and state-of-the-art review methods, prevention science will be in a better position to positively impact public health.",
keywords = "Effectiveness, Meta-Analysis, Replication, Reproducibility, Systematic Review",
author = "Valentine, {Jeffrey C.} and Anthony Biglan and Boruch, {Robert F.} and Felipe Castro and Collins, {Linda M.} and Flay, {Brian R.} and Sheppard Kellam and Mościcki, {Eve K.} and Schinke, {Steven P.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "103--117",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replication in Prevention Science

AU - Valentine, Jeffrey C.

AU - Biglan, Anthony

AU - Boruch, Robert F.

AU - Castro, Felipe

AU - Collins, Linda M.

AU - Flay, Brian R.

AU - Kellam, Sheppard

AU - Mościcki, Eve K.

AU - Schinke, Steven P.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Replication research is essential for the advancement of any scientific field. In this paper, we argue that prevention science will be better positioned to help improve public health if (a) more replications are conducted; (b) those replications are systematic, thoughtful, and conducted with full knowledge of the trials that have preceded them; and (c) state-of-the art techniques are used to summarize the body of evidence on the effects of the interventions. Under real-world demands it is often not feasible to wait for multiple replications to accumulate before making decisions about intervention adoption. To help individuals and agencies make better decisions about intervention utility, we outline strategies that can be used to help understand the likely direction, size, and range of intervention effects as suggested by the current knowledge base. We also suggest structural changes that could increase the amount and quality of replication research, such as the provision of incentives and a more vigorous pursuit of prospective research registers. Finally, we discuss methods for integrating replications into the roll-out of a program and suggest that strong partnerships with local decision makers are a key component of success in replication research. Our hope is that this paper can highlight the importance of replication and stimulate more discussion of the important elements of the replication process. We are confident that, armed with more and better replications and state-of-the-art review methods, prevention science will be in a better position to positively impact public health.

AB - Replication research is essential for the advancement of any scientific field. In this paper, we argue that prevention science will be better positioned to help improve public health if (a) more replications are conducted; (b) those replications are systematic, thoughtful, and conducted with full knowledge of the trials that have preceded them; and (c) state-of-the art techniques are used to summarize the body of evidence on the effects of the interventions. Under real-world demands it is often not feasible to wait for multiple replications to accumulate before making decisions about intervention adoption. To help individuals and agencies make better decisions about intervention utility, we outline strategies that can be used to help understand the likely direction, size, and range of intervention effects as suggested by the current knowledge base. We also suggest structural changes that could increase the amount and quality of replication research, such as the provision of incentives and a more vigorous pursuit of prospective research registers. Finally, we discuss methods for integrating replications into the roll-out of a program and suggest that strong partnerships with local decision makers are a key component of success in replication research. Our hope is that this paper can highlight the importance of replication and stimulate more discussion of the important elements of the replication process. We are confident that, armed with more and better replications and state-of-the-art review methods, prevention science will be in a better position to positively impact public health.

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Meta-Analysis

KW - Replication

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Systematic Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958021476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958021476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6

DO - 10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 21541692

AN - SCOPUS:79958021476

VL - 12

SP - 103

EP - 117

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 2

ER -