Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI

Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects

Samuel Dambreville, Arlene B. Chapman, Vicente E. Torres, Bernard F. King, Ashley K. Wallin, David Frakes, Ajit P. Yoganathan, Sameera R. Wijayawardana, Kirk Easley, Kyongtae T. Bae, Marijn E. Brummer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13% for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55%. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21%) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90%) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20%) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)940-950
Number of pages11
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Renal Circulation
Healthy Volunteers
Kidney
Pulsatile Flow
Gadolinium
Technology

Keywords

  • Flow validation
  • Kidney imaging
  • Phase velocity imaging
  • Quantitative flow
  • Renal blood flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI : Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects. / Dambreville, Samuel; Chapman, Arlene B.; Torres, Vicente E.; King, Bernard F.; Wallin, Ashley K.; Frakes, David; Yoganathan, Ajit P.; Wijayawardana, Sameera R.; Easley, Kirk; Bae, Kyongtae T.; Brummer, Marijn E.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 63, No. 4, 05.2010, p. 940-950.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dambreville, S, Chapman, AB, Torres, VE, King, BF, Wallin, AK, Frakes, D, Yoganathan, AP, Wijayawardana, SR, Easley, K, Bae, KT & Brummer, ME 2010, 'Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects', Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 940-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22278
Dambreville, Samuel ; Chapman, Arlene B. ; Torres, Vicente E. ; King, Bernard F. ; Wallin, Ashley K. ; Frakes, David ; Yoganathan, Ajit P. ; Wijayawardana, Sameera R. ; Easley, Kirk ; Bae, Kyongtae T. ; Brummer, Marijn E. / Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI : Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects. In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 63, No. 4. pp. 940-950.
@article{da91ee8dd4804005aed3a1191c04844d,
title = "Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI: Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects",
abstract = "This study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13{\%} for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55{\%}. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21{\%}) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90{\%}) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20{\%}) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow.",
keywords = "Flow validation, Kidney imaging, Phase velocity imaging, Quantitative flow, Renal blood flow",
author = "Samuel Dambreville and Chapman, {Arlene B.} and Torres, {Vicente E.} and King, {Bernard F.} and Wallin, {Ashley K.} and David Frakes and Yoganathan, {Ajit P.} and Wijayawardana, {Sameera R.} and Kirk Easley and Bae, {Kyongtae T.} and Brummer, {Marijn E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.22278",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "940--950",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renal arterial blood flow measurement by breath-held MRI

T2 - Accuracy in phantom scans and Reproducibility in healthy subjects

AU - Dambreville, Samuel

AU - Chapman, Arlene B.

AU - Torres, Vicente E.

AU - King, Bernard F.

AU - Wallin, Ashley K.

AU - Frakes, David

AU - Yoganathan, Ajit P.

AU - Wijayawardana, Sameera R.

AU - Easley, Kirk

AU - Bae, Kyongtae T.

AU - Brummer, Marijn E.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - This study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13% for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55%. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21%) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90%) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20%) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow.

AB - This study evaluates reliability of current technology for measurement of renal arterial blood flow by breath-held velocityencoded MRI. Overall accuracy was determined by comparing MRI measurements with known flow in controlled-flow-loop phantom studies. Measurements using prospective and retrospective gating methods were compared in phantom studies with pulsatile flow, not revealing significant differences. Phantom study results showed good accuracy, with deviations from true flow consistently below 13% for vessel diameters 3mm and above. Reproducibility in human subjects was evaluated by repeated studies in six healthy control subjects, comparing immediate repetition of the scan, repetition of the scan plane scouting, and week-to-week variation in repeated studies. The standard deviation in the 4-week protocol of repeated in vivo measurements of single-kidney renal flow in normal subjects was 59.7 mL/min, corresponding with an average coefficient of variation of 10.55%. Comparison of renal arterial blood flow reproducibility with and without gadolinium contrast showed no significant differences in mean or standard deviation. A breakdown among error components showed corresponding marginal standard deviations (coefficients of variation) 23.8 mL/min (4.21%) for immediate repetition of the breath-held flow scan, 39.13 mL/min (6.90%) for repeated plane scouting, and 40.76 mL/min (7.20%) for weekly fluctuations in renal blood flow.

KW - Flow validation

KW - Kidney imaging

KW - Phase velocity imaging

KW - Quantitative flow

KW - Renal blood flow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950606467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950606467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.22278

DO - 10.1002/mrm.22278

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 940

EP - 950

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 4

ER -