Renaissance of case research as a scientific method

Mikko Ketokivi, Thomas Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

260 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the seminal article by Eisenhardt (1989), scholarly interest in case research has mushroomed in operations management and organization sciences. Volumes of methodological texts are matched with a massive amount of empirical research that seeks to apply and further develop case research as a scientific method. What is missing from this literature is a treatment of the methodological diversity of case research. In this paper, we seek to unveil this heterogeneity by describing three distinct methodological accounts of case study: theory generation, theory testing, and theory elaboration. Each approach has its own idiosyncrasies, in particular when it comes to the interplay between theory and empirics. A typical case research incorporates both existing theories and empirical data to varying degrees. In light of this heterogeneity, we re-interpret key aspects of extant contributions and discuss guidelines for future case research. We propose that ultimately, case research rigor is determined by attention to idiosyncrasy and transparency of reasoning. We conclude by arguing that we have witnessed in the past 25 years in organization research what amounts to the Renaissance of case research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-240
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Scientific method
Case research
Transparency
Testing
Empirics
Research organization
Empirical research
Theory testing
Empirical data
Operations management
Elaboration

Keywords

  • Case research
  • Methodology
  • Reasoning
  • Theory building
  • Theory elaboration
  • Theory testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. / Ketokivi, Mikko; Choi, Thomas.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2014, p. 232-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa64e08e041d44f0b20b5a155c07fae2,
title = "Renaissance of case research as a scientific method",
abstract = "Since the seminal article by Eisenhardt (1989), scholarly interest in case research has mushroomed in operations management and organization sciences. Volumes of methodological texts are matched with a massive amount of empirical research that seeks to apply and further develop case research as a scientific method. What is missing from this literature is a treatment of the methodological diversity of case research. In this paper, we seek to unveil this heterogeneity by describing three distinct methodological accounts of case study: theory generation, theory testing, and theory elaboration. Each approach has its own idiosyncrasies, in particular when it comes to the interplay between theory and empirics. A typical case research incorporates both existing theories and empirical data to varying degrees. In light of this heterogeneity, we re-interpret key aspects of extant contributions and discuss guidelines for future case research. We propose that ultimately, case research rigor is determined by attention to idiosyncrasy and transparency of reasoning. We conclude by arguing that we have witnessed in the past 25 years in organization research what amounts to the Renaissance of case research.",
keywords = "Case research, Methodology, Reasoning, Theory building, Theory elaboration, Theory testing",
author = "Mikko Ketokivi and Thomas Choi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "232--240",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renaissance of case research as a scientific method

AU - Ketokivi, Mikko

AU - Choi, Thomas

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Since the seminal article by Eisenhardt (1989), scholarly interest in case research has mushroomed in operations management and organization sciences. Volumes of methodological texts are matched with a massive amount of empirical research that seeks to apply and further develop case research as a scientific method. What is missing from this literature is a treatment of the methodological diversity of case research. In this paper, we seek to unveil this heterogeneity by describing three distinct methodological accounts of case study: theory generation, theory testing, and theory elaboration. Each approach has its own idiosyncrasies, in particular when it comes to the interplay between theory and empirics. A typical case research incorporates both existing theories and empirical data to varying degrees. In light of this heterogeneity, we re-interpret key aspects of extant contributions and discuss guidelines for future case research. We propose that ultimately, case research rigor is determined by attention to idiosyncrasy and transparency of reasoning. We conclude by arguing that we have witnessed in the past 25 years in organization research what amounts to the Renaissance of case research.

AB - Since the seminal article by Eisenhardt (1989), scholarly interest in case research has mushroomed in operations management and organization sciences. Volumes of methodological texts are matched with a massive amount of empirical research that seeks to apply and further develop case research as a scientific method. What is missing from this literature is a treatment of the methodological diversity of case research. In this paper, we seek to unveil this heterogeneity by describing three distinct methodological accounts of case study: theory generation, theory testing, and theory elaboration. Each approach has its own idiosyncrasies, in particular when it comes to the interplay between theory and empirics. A typical case research incorporates both existing theories and empirical data to varying degrees. In light of this heterogeneity, we re-interpret key aspects of extant contributions and discuss guidelines for future case research. We propose that ultimately, case research rigor is determined by attention to idiosyncrasy and transparency of reasoning. We conclude by arguing that we have witnessed in the past 25 years in organization research what amounts to the Renaissance of case research.

KW - Case research

KW - Methodology

KW - Reasoning

KW - Theory building

KW - Theory elaboration

KW - Theory testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899876162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899876162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 232

EP - 240

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 5

ER -