Removal of Bromide from Surface Water

Comparison between Silver-Impregnated Graphene Oxide and Silver-Impregnated Powdered Activated Carbon

Justin Kidd, Ana Barrios, Onur Apul, Francois Perreault, Paul Westerhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study demonstrates that silver (Ag+) impregnated graphene oxide (GO) reduces anion and natural organic matter (NOM) competition for bromide (Br-) adsorption sites compared with Ag+ impregnated powdered activated carbon (PAC). We impregnated two GO (Tour and Modifier Hummers [MH] method) and one PAC with silver ions. Batch studies were conducted to assess Br- removal in model waters with Br-, chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3 -), and/or NOM and natural surface waters. In buffered ultrapure water, Tour-Ag, MH-Ag, and PAC-Ag all removed >85% of Br-, while sorbents without Ag+ removed <3% of Br-. In all water matrices, Tour-Ag removed >75% of Br-, MH-Ag removed >50%, and PAC-Ag removed >30%, highlighting that GO-Ag is more effective at removing Br- from water than PAC-Ag (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis show that Br- is evenly dispersed on the surface of GO-Ag, indicating possible attachment to oxygen groups and silver on the GO surface. A leaching test of GO-Ag in buffered water showed that ∼20% of Ag+ loaded onto GO leaches into solution, of which only 1-3% remains when Br- is spiked into solution, indicating possible complexation and precipitation as AgBr. GO-Ag and PAC-Ag were introduced separately in combination with alum during coagulation and flocculation operations. Both MH-Ag and Tour-Ag showed high removal of Br-, demonstrating that GO-Ag could supplement current technologies used in water treatment facilities when Br- removal is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)988-995
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Engineering Science
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Graphite
Bromides
Surface waters
bromide
Silver
Activated carbon
Graphene
activated carbon
silver
Oxides
oxide
surface water
Water
Biological materials
disilver oxide
removal
comparison
organic matter
water
Flocculation

Keywords

  • bromide
  • graphene oxide
  • silver
  • surface water
  • treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

@article{9550cbcc92be4394854352460d828c51,
title = "Removal of Bromide from Surface Water: Comparison between Silver-Impregnated Graphene Oxide and Silver-Impregnated Powdered Activated Carbon",
abstract = "This study demonstrates that silver (Ag+) impregnated graphene oxide (GO) reduces anion and natural organic matter (NOM) competition for bromide (Br-) adsorption sites compared with Ag+ impregnated powdered activated carbon (PAC). We impregnated two GO (Tour and Modifier Hummers [MH] method) and one PAC with silver ions. Batch studies were conducted to assess Br- removal in model waters with Br-, chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3 -), and/or NOM and natural surface waters. In buffered ultrapure water, Tour-Ag, MH-Ag, and PAC-Ag all removed >85{\%} of Br-, while sorbents without Ag+ removed <3{\%} of Br-. In all water matrices, Tour-Ag removed >75{\%} of Br-, MH-Ag removed >50{\%}, and PAC-Ag removed >30{\%}, highlighting that GO-Ag is more effective at removing Br- from water than PAC-Ag (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis show that Br- is evenly dispersed on the surface of GO-Ag, indicating possible attachment to oxygen groups and silver on the GO surface. A leaching test of GO-Ag in buffered water showed that ∼20{\%} of Ag+ loaded onto GO leaches into solution, of which only 1-3{\%} remains when Br- is spiked into solution, indicating possible complexation and precipitation as AgBr. GO-Ag and PAC-Ag were introduced separately in combination with alum during coagulation and flocculation operations. Both MH-Ag and Tour-Ag showed high removal of Br-, demonstrating that GO-Ag could supplement current technologies used in water treatment facilities when Br- removal is needed.",
keywords = "bromide, graphene oxide, silver, surface water, treatment",
author = "Justin Kidd and Ana Barrios and Onur Apul and Francois Perreault and Paul Westerhoff",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ees.2017.0485",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "988--995",
journal = "Environmental Engineering Science",
issn = "1092-8758",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Removal of Bromide from Surface Water

T2 - Comparison between Silver-Impregnated Graphene Oxide and Silver-Impregnated Powdered Activated Carbon

AU - Kidd, Justin

AU - Barrios, Ana

AU - Apul, Onur

AU - Perreault, Francois

AU - Westerhoff, Paul

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - This study demonstrates that silver (Ag+) impregnated graphene oxide (GO) reduces anion and natural organic matter (NOM) competition for bromide (Br-) adsorption sites compared with Ag+ impregnated powdered activated carbon (PAC). We impregnated two GO (Tour and Modifier Hummers [MH] method) and one PAC with silver ions. Batch studies were conducted to assess Br- removal in model waters with Br-, chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3 -), and/or NOM and natural surface waters. In buffered ultrapure water, Tour-Ag, MH-Ag, and PAC-Ag all removed >85% of Br-, while sorbents without Ag+ removed <3% of Br-. In all water matrices, Tour-Ag removed >75% of Br-, MH-Ag removed >50%, and PAC-Ag removed >30%, highlighting that GO-Ag is more effective at removing Br- from water than PAC-Ag (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis show that Br- is evenly dispersed on the surface of GO-Ag, indicating possible attachment to oxygen groups and silver on the GO surface. A leaching test of GO-Ag in buffered water showed that ∼20% of Ag+ loaded onto GO leaches into solution, of which only 1-3% remains when Br- is spiked into solution, indicating possible complexation and precipitation as AgBr. GO-Ag and PAC-Ag were introduced separately in combination with alum during coagulation and flocculation operations. Both MH-Ag and Tour-Ag showed high removal of Br-, demonstrating that GO-Ag could supplement current technologies used in water treatment facilities when Br- removal is needed.

AB - This study demonstrates that silver (Ag+) impregnated graphene oxide (GO) reduces anion and natural organic matter (NOM) competition for bromide (Br-) adsorption sites compared with Ag+ impregnated powdered activated carbon (PAC). We impregnated two GO (Tour and Modifier Hummers [MH] method) and one PAC with silver ions. Batch studies were conducted to assess Br- removal in model waters with Br-, chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3 -), and/or NOM and natural surface waters. In buffered ultrapure water, Tour-Ag, MH-Ag, and PAC-Ag all removed >85% of Br-, while sorbents without Ag+ removed <3% of Br-. In all water matrices, Tour-Ag removed >75% of Br-, MH-Ag removed >50%, and PAC-Ag removed >30%, highlighting that GO-Ag is more effective at removing Br- from water than PAC-Ag (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis show that Br- is evenly dispersed on the surface of GO-Ag, indicating possible attachment to oxygen groups and silver on the GO surface. A leaching test of GO-Ag in buffered water showed that ∼20% of Ag+ loaded onto GO leaches into solution, of which only 1-3% remains when Br- is spiked into solution, indicating possible complexation and precipitation as AgBr. GO-Ag and PAC-Ag were introduced separately in combination with alum during coagulation and flocculation operations. Both MH-Ag and Tour-Ag showed high removal of Br-, demonstrating that GO-Ag could supplement current technologies used in water treatment facilities when Br- removal is needed.

KW - bromide

KW - graphene oxide

KW - silver

KW - surface water

KW - treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047890581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047890581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ees.2017.0485

DO - 10.1089/ees.2017.0485

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 988

EP - 995

JO - Environmental Engineering Science

JF - Environmental Engineering Science

SN - 1092-8758

IS - 9

ER -