‘Religion’ as a Philosophical Problem: Historical and Conceptual Dilemmas in Contemporary Pluralistic Philosophy of Religion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the late nineteenth century, European philosophical theologians concerned about the perceived threat of secularity played a crucial role in the construction of the category of ‘religion,’ conceived as a transcultural universal, the genus of which the so-called ‘world religions’ are species. By reading the work of the late John Hick (1922–2012), the most influential contemporary philosophical advocate of religious pluralism, through an historically informed hermeneutic of suspicion, this paper argues that orientalist-derived understandings of religion continue to play a significant (though often unacknowledged) role within the philosophy of religion today. Though couched in the language of pluralism, Hick’s later work in the philosophy of religion functions apologetically to maintain a version of the religious–secular distinction that, while theologically and politically loaded, is, I show, philosophically arbitrary. Moving the philosophy of religion beyond Eurocentrism, I argue, will require freeing it from the logic of the modern understanding of religion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-496
Number of pages18
JournalSophia
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Religion
Contemporary philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Philosophical Problems
Religious Pluralism
Language
Theologians
Eurocentrism
Transcultural
World Religions
Pluralism
Threat
Orientalist
Logic
John Hick
Secularity
Hermeneutics of Suspicion

Keywords

  • Cultural history of the study of religion
  • John Hick
  • Orientalism
  • Philosophy of religion
  • Secular
  • Secularization
  • World religions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

‘Religion’ as a Philosophical Problem : Historical and Conceptual Dilemmas in Contemporary Pluralistic Philosophy of Religion. / Amesbury, Richard.

In: Sophia, Vol. 53, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 479-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a7ccc5489f448bf8e8bfab43e1781d5,
title = "‘Religion’ as a Philosophical Problem: Historical and Conceptual Dilemmas in Contemporary Pluralistic Philosophy of Religion",
abstract = "In the late nineteenth century, European philosophical theologians concerned about the perceived threat of secularity played a crucial role in the construction of the category of ‘religion,’ conceived as a transcultural universal, the genus of which the so-called ‘world religions’ are species. By reading the work of the late John Hick (1922–2012), the most influential contemporary philosophical advocate of religious pluralism, through an historically informed hermeneutic of suspicion, this paper argues that orientalist-derived understandings of religion continue to play a significant (though often unacknowledged) role within the philosophy of religion today. Though couched in the language of pluralism, Hick’s later work in the philosophy of religion functions apologetically to maintain a version of the religious–secular distinction that, while theologically and politically loaded, is, I show, philosophically arbitrary. Moving the philosophy of religion beyond Eurocentrism, I argue, will require freeing it from the logic of the modern understanding of religion.",
keywords = "Cultural history of the study of religion, John Hick, Orientalism, Philosophy of religion, Secular, Secularization, World religions",
author = "Richard Amesbury",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11841-013-0394-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "479--496",
journal = "Sophia",
issn = "0038-1527",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Religion’ as a Philosophical Problem

T2 - Historical and Conceptual Dilemmas in Contemporary Pluralistic Philosophy of Religion

AU - Amesbury, Richard

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In the late nineteenth century, European philosophical theologians concerned about the perceived threat of secularity played a crucial role in the construction of the category of ‘religion,’ conceived as a transcultural universal, the genus of which the so-called ‘world religions’ are species. By reading the work of the late John Hick (1922–2012), the most influential contemporary philosophical advocate of religious pluralism, through an historically informed hermeneutic of suspicion, this paper argues that orientalist-derived understandings of religion continue to play a significant (though often unacknowledged) role within the philosophy of religion today. Though couched in the language of pluralism, Hick’s later work in the philosophy of religion functions apologetically to maintain a version of the religious–secular distinction that, while theologically and politically loaded, is, I show, philosophically arbitrary. Moving the philosophy of religion beyond Eurocentrism, I argue, will require freeing it from the logic of the modern understanding of religion.

AB - In the late nineteenth century, European philosophical theologians concerned about the perceived threat of secularity played a crucial role in the construction of the category of ‘religion,’ conceived as a transcultural universal, the genus of which the so-called ‘world religions’ are species. By reading the work of the late John Hick (1922–2012), the most influential contemporary philosophical advocate of religious pluralism, through an historically informed hermeneutic of suspicion, this paper argues that orientalist-derived understandings of religion continue to play a significant (though often unacknowledged) role within the philosophy of religion today. Though couched in the language of pluralism, Hick’s later work in the philosophy of religion functions apologetically to maintain a version of the religious–secular distinction that, while theologically and politically loaded, is, I show, philosophically arbitrary. Moving the philosophy of religion beyond Eurocentrism, I argue, will require freeing it from the logic of the modern understanding of religion.

KW - Cultural history of the study of religion

KW - John Hick

KW - Orientalism

KW - Philosophy of religion

KW - Secular

KW - Secularization

KW - World religions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893644425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893644425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11841-013-0394-9

DO - 10.1007/s11841-013-0394-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893644425

VL - 53

SP - 479

EP - 496

JO - Sophia

JF - Sophia

SN - 0038-1527

IS - 4

ER -