Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect

Pablo Casas Arce, Martin Holzhacker, Matthias D. Mahlendorf, Michal Matejka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When targets depend on past performance, incentives are adversely affected by the ratchet effect. We provide theory and evidence that incorporating past peer performance into targets can alleviate this adverse incentive effect. In particular, we present an analytical model that characterizes optimal target revisions as a function of past own and past peer performance. We then test the predictions of our model using data on 2008–2010 performance targets from 354 units of a governmental agency responsible for reintegration of the long-term unemployed into the labor market. As a unique feature of our data, we have information on peer group quality, defined as the extent to which peer performance is informative about common shocks. Consistent with our model, we find that higher peer group quality (a) increases sensitivity of target revisions to past peer performance, (b) reduces sensitivity of target revisions to past own performance, and (c) reduces the ratchet effect as reflected in managerial incentives to withhold end-of-year effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1702-1731
Number of pages30
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Ratchet effect
Relative performance evaluation
Peers
Peer group
Analytical model
Incentive effect
Prediction
Managerial incentives
Common shocks
Labour market
Incentives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect. / Casas Arce, Pablo; Holzhacker, Martin; Mahlendorf, Matthias D.; Matejka, Michal.

In: Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 1702-1731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casas Arce, Pablo ; Holzhacker, Martin ; Mahlendorf, Matthias D. ; Matejka, Michal. / Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect. In: Contemporary Accounting Research. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 1702-1731.
@article{a2d9c0595fe24164a811cb5725b833cc,
title = "Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect",
abstract = "When targets depend on past performance, incentives are adversely affected by the ratchet effect. We provide theory and evidence that incorporating past peer performance into targets can alleviate this adverse incentive effect. In particular, we present an analytical model that characterizes optimal target revisions as a function of past own and past peer performance. We then test the predictions of our model using data on 2008–2010 performance targets from 354 units of a governmental agency responsible for reintegration of the long-term unemployed into the labor market. As a unique feature of our data, we have information on peer group quality, defined as the extent to which peer performance is informative about common shocks. Consistent with our model, we find that higher peer group quality (a) increases sensitivity of target revisions to past peer performance, (b) reduces sensitivity of target revisions to past own performance, and (c) reduces the ratchet effect as reflected in managerial incentives to withhold end-of-year effort.",
author = "{Casas Arce}, Pablo and Martin Holzhacker and Mahlendorf, {Matthias D.} and Michal Matejka",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1911-3846.12385",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1702--1731",
journal = "Contemporary Accounting Research",
issn = "0823-9150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative Performance Evaluation and the Ratchet Effect

AU - Casas Arce, Pablo

AU - Holzhacker, Martin

AU - Mahlendorf, Matthias D.

AU - Matejka, Michal

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - When targets depend on past performance, incentives are adversely affected by the ratchet effect. We provide theory and evidence that incorporating past peer performance into targets can alleviate this adverse incentive effect. In particular, we present an analytical model that characterizes optimal target revisions as a function of past own and past peer performance. We then test the predictions of our model using data on 2008–2010 performance targets from 354 units of a governmental agency responsible for reintegration of the long-term unemployed into the labor market. As a unique feature of our data, we have information on peer group quality, defined as the extent to which peer performance is informative about common shocks. Consistent with our model, we find that higher peer group quality (a) increases sensitivity of target revisions to past peer performance, (b) reduces sensitivity of target revisions to past own performance, and (c) reduces the ratchet effect as reflected in managerial incentives to withhold end-of-year effort.

AB - When targets depend on past performance, incentives are adversely affected by the ratchet effect. We provide theory and evidence that incorporating past peer performance into targets can alleviate this adverse incentive effect. In particular, we present an analytical model that characterizes optimal target revisions as a function of past own and past peer performance. We then test the predictions of our model using data on 2008–2010 performance targets from 354 units of a governmental agency responsible for reintegration of the long-term unemployed into the labor market. As a unique feature of our data, we have information on peer group quality, defined as the extent to which peer performance is informative about common shocks. Consistent with our model, we find that higher peer group quality (a) increases sensitivity of target revisions to past peer performance, (b) reduces sensitivity of target revisions to past own performance, and (c) reduces the ratchet effect as reflected in managerial incentives to withhold end-of-year effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055927116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055927116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12385

DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12385

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055927116

VL - 35

SP - 1702

EP - 1731

JO - Contemporary Accounting Research

JF - Contemporary Accounting Research

SN - 0823-9150

IS - 4

ER -